A DISTRIBUTED METHOD FOR TRANSIENT SIMULATIONS THAT DYNAMICALLY CONSIDERS SUPPLEMENTARY RESULTS FROM AUTONOMOUS SOFTWARE AGENTS

Matthias Jüttner

matthias.juttner@ite.uni-stuttgart.de
University of Stuttgart, Institute for Theory of Electrical Engineering (Germany)

Sebastian Grabmaier


University of Stuttgart, Institute for Theory of Electrical Engineering (Germany)

Jonas Rohloff


University of Stuttgart, Institute for Theory of Electrical Engineering (Germany)

Desirée Vögeli


University of Stuttgart, Institute of Industrial Automation and Software Engineering (Germany)

Wolfgang M. Rucker


University of Stuttgart, Institute for Theory of Electrical Engineering (Germany)

Peter Göhner


University of Stuttgart, Institute of Industrial Automation and Software Engineering (Germany)

Michael Weyrich


University of Stuttgart, Institute of Industrial Automation and Software Engineering (Germany)

Abstract

Based on autonomous software agents capable of calculating individual numerical field problems, a distributed method for solving transient field problems is presented. The software agents are running on distributed resources connected via a network and represent a dynamic calculation environment. Communication and data exchange between multiple agents enables their collaboration and allows decisions based on distributed overall knowledge. As unique characteristics, no central unit influences the solution process at any time. The presented simulation example and its evaluated calculation process proves the method to benefit from redundant resources.


Keywords:

automatic step size control, distributed computing, software agents, transient simulation

Bíró O.: Edge element formulations of eddy current problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 169(3-4)/1999, 391–405.
  Google Scholar

Celaya E.A., Aguirrezabala J.A., Chatzipantelidis P.: Implementation of an Adaptive BDF2 Formula and Comparison with the MATLAB Ode15s. Procedia Computer Science 29/2014, 1014–1026.
  Google Scholar

Emson C., Trowbridge C.: Transient 3D Eddy Currents Using Modified Magnetic Vector Potentials and Magnetic Scalar Potentials. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 24(1)/1988, 86–98.
  Google Scholar

Gander M.J.: 50 Years of Time Parallel Time Integration. Multiple Shooting and Time Domain Decomposition Methods, Cham, Springer, 2015, 69–113.
  Google Scholar

Hairer E., Nørsett S.P., Wanner G.: Solving ordinary differential equations I. Nonstiff Problems, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin 2009.
  Google Scholar

Hindmarsh A.C., Brown P.N., Grant K.E., Lee S.L., Serban R., Shumaker D., Woodward C.S.: SUNDIALS: Suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 31(3)/2005, 363–396.
  Google Scholar

Jennings N.R.: On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence 117/1999, 277–296.
  Google Scholar

Jüttner M., Grabmaier S., Vögeli D., Rucker W.M., Göhner P.: Coupled Multiphysics Problems as Market Place for Competing Autonomous Software Agents. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 53(6)/2017.
  Google Scholar

Moore P.K., Petzold L.R.: A stepsize control strategy for stiff systems of ordinary differential equations. Applied numerical mathematics 15(4)/1994, 449–463.
  Google Scholar

Zienkiewicz O.C., Emson C., Bettess P.: A novel boundary infinite element. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 19(3)/1983, 393–404.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2018-05-30

Cited by

Jüttner, M., Grabmaier, S., Rohloff, J., Vögeli, D., Rucker, W. M., Göhner, P., & Weyrich, M. (2018). A DISTRIBUTED METHOD FOR TRANSIENT SIMULATIONS THAT DYNAMICALLY CONSIDERS SUPPLEMENTARY RESULTS FROM AUTONOMOUS SOFTWARE AGENTS. Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary W Gospodarce I Ochronie Środowiska, 8(2), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.0701

Authors

Matthias Jüttner 
matthias.juttner@ite.uni-stuttgart.de
University of Stuttgart, Institute for Theory of Electrical Engineering Germany

Authors

Sebastian Grabmaier 

University of Stuttgart, Institute for Theory of Electrical Engineering Germany

Authors

Jonas Rohloff 

University of Stuttgart, Institute for Theory of Electrical Engineering Germany

Authors

Desirée Vögeli 

University of Stuttgart, Institute of Industrial Automation and Software Engineering Germany

Authors

Wolfgang M. Rucker 

University of Stuttgart, Institute for Theory of Electrical Engineering Germany

Authors

Peter Göhner 

University of Stuttgart, Institute of Industrial Automation and Software Engineering Germany

Authors

Michael Weyrich 

University of Stuttgart, Institute of Industrial Automation and Software Engineering Germany

Statistics

Abstract views: 209
PDF downloads: 124