HOW STABLE ARE INSTRUMENTAL BIASES P2-C2?


Abstract

This paper presented results of investigations about estimation DCB P2-C2 for satellites and receiver in GPS system. The data from LAMA station in Poland were used to determination of stability instrumental biases P2-C2, using least square method. Author proposed new strategy to solution of DCB P2-C2 (biases were calculated with temporal resolution 2 hours). The test results were compared with CODE’s product. Difference between proposed method and CODE’s values for Satellite DCB is less than ± 1 ns and for Receiver DCB less than ± 0.2 ns. Standard deviation of presented method is about 0.4 ns.


Keywords

code; dcb; gps

Dach R., Shaer S.: Biases in GNSS analysis. IGS Workshop, Newcastle, England, 2010.

Elsobeiey M.: An Improved Model For Precise Point Positioning With Modernized Global Positioning System. Theses and dissertations. Paper 1324, Ryerson University, 2012.

Garcia C., Santos M., van Bree R., van der Marel H., Verhagen S.: Experimental of a PPP-based P2-C2 bias estimation. IGS Workshop, Newcastle, England, 2010.

Ghoddousi-Fard R.: DCB estimation in NRCan: Status and future plans. Workshop on GNSS Biases, Bern, Switzerland, 2012.

Langley R., Leandro R., Santos M.: Estimation of P2-C2 Biases by means of Precise Point Positioning. Proceedings of ION AM 2007, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 225–231.

Shaer S.: Overview of GNSS biases. IGS Workshop on GNSS Biases, Switzerland, Bern, 2012.

Takasu T.: RTKLIB ver. 2.4.2 Manual, 2013.

http://igs.bkg.bund.de/file/rinexsearch/

ftp://ftp.unibe.ch/aiub/CODE/2014/

Download

Published : 2015-09-02


Krasuski, K. (2015). HOW STABLE ARE INSTRUMENTAL BIASES P2-C2?. Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary W Gospodarce I Ochronie Środowiska, 5(3), 51-52. https://doi.org/10.5604/20830157.1166553

Kamil Krasuski  kk_deblin@wp.pl
Team of Satellites Techniques, Dęblin; District Office in Ryki, Faculty of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre  Poland