PV SYSTEM MPPT CONTROL: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF P&O, INCCOND, SMC AND FLC ALGORITHMS
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 14 No. 4 (2024)
-
IDENTIFICATION OF AN ARBITRARY SHAPE RIGID OBSTACLE ILLUMINATED BY FLAT ACOUSTIC WAVE USING NEAR FIELD DATA
Tomasz Rymarczyk, Jan Sikora5-9
-
RADIO FREQUENCY BASED INPAINTING FOR INDOOR LOCALIZATION USING MEMORYLESS TECHNIQUES AND WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY
Tammineni Shanmukha Prasanthi, Swarajya Madhuri Rayavarapu, Gottapu Sasibhushana Rao, Raj Kumar Goswami, Gottapu Santosh Kumar10-15
-
INTELLIGENT MATCHING TECHNIQUE FOR FLEXIBLE ANTENNAS
Olena Semenova, Andriy Semenov, Stefan Meulesteen, Natalia Kryvinska, Hanna Pastushenko16-22
-
DIFFERENTIAL MUELLER-MATRIX MAPPING OF THE POLYCRYSTALLINE COMPONENT OF BIOLOGICAL TISSUES OF HUMAN ORGANS
Andrei Padure, Oksana Bakun, Ivan Mikirin, Oleksandr Dubolazov, Iryna Soltys, Oleksandr Olar, Yuriy Ushenko, Oleksandr Ushenko, Irina Palii, Saule Kumargazhanova23-27
-
POLARIZATION SELECTOR ON WAVEGUIDES PARTIALLY FILLED BY DIELECTRIC
Vitaly Pochernyaev, Nataliia Syvkova, Mariia Mahomedova28-31
-
FUNCTIONALLY INTEGRATED DEVICE FOR TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT
Les Hotra, Oksana Boyko, Igor Helzhynskyy, Hryhorii Barylo, Marharyta Rozhdestvenska, Halyna Lastivka32-37
-
STUDY OF THE OZONE CONTROL PROCESS USING ELECTRONIC SENSORS
Sunggat Marxuly, Askar Abdykadyrov, Katipa Chezhimbayeva, Nurzhigit Smailov38-45
-
OPTIMIZING WIND POWER PLANTS: COMPARATIVE ENHANCEMENT IN LOW WIND SPEED ENVIRONMENTS
Mustafa Hussein Ibrahim, Muhammed A. Ibrahim, Salam Ibrahim Khather46-51
-
PV SYSTEM MPPT CONTROL: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF P&O, INCCOND, SMC AND FLC ALGORITHMS
Khoukha Bouguerra, Samia Latreche, Hamza Khemlche, Mabrouk Khemliche52-62
-
DSTATCOM-BASED 15 LEVEL ASYMMETRICAL MULTILEVEL INVERTER FOR IMPROVING POWER QUALITY
Panneerselvam Sundaramoorthi, Govindasamy Saravana Venkatesh63-70
-
COMPUTER SIMULATION OF A SUPERCONDUCTING TRANSFORMER SHORT-CIRCUIT
Leszek Jaroszyński71-74
-
AI-BASED FIELD-ORIENTED CONTROL FOR INDUCTION MOTORS
Elmehdi Benmalek, Marouane Rayyam, Ayoub Gege, Omar Ennasiri, Adil Ezzaidi75-81
-
INVESTIGATION OF CHANGES IN THE LEVEL OF NETWORK SECURITY BASED ON A COGNITIVE APPROACH
Olha Saliieva, Yurii Yaremchuk82-85
-
THE UTILIZATION OF MACHINE LEARNING FOR NETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS
Ahmad Sanmorino, Herri Setiawan, John Roni Coyanda86-89
-
USING SUPPORT VECTORS TO BUILD A RULE-BASED SYSTEM FOR DETECTING MALICIOUS PROCESSES IN AN ORGANISATION'S NETWORK TRAFFIC
Halyna Haidur, Sergii Gakhov, Dmytro Hamza90-96
-
EXTRACTING EMOTION-CAUSE PAIRS: A BILSTM-DRIVEN METHODOLOGY
Raga Madhuri Chandra, Giri Venkata Sai Tej Neelaiahgari, Satya Sumanth Vanapalli97-103
-
IMPROVING α-PARAMETERIZED DIFFERENTIAL TRANSFORM METHOD WITH DANDELION OPTIMIZER FOR SOLVING ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Mustafa Raed Najeeb, Omar Saber Qasim104-108
-
THE METHOD OF ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL CODING TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF VIDEO IMAGES
Volodymyr Barannik, Dmytro Havrylov, Serhii Pantas, Yurii Tsimura, Tatayna Belikova, Rimma Viedienieva, Vasyl Kryshtal109-114
-
OPTIMIZING TIME SERIES FORECASTING: LEVERAGING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR ENHANCED PREDICTIVE ACCURACY
Waldemar Wójcik, Assem Shayakhmetova, Ardak Akhmetova, Assel Abdildayeva, Galymzhan Nurtugan115-120
-
SYNCHRONIZATION OF EVENT-DRIVEN MANAGEMENT DURING DATA COLLECTION
Valeriy Kuzminykh, Oleksandr Koval, Yevhen Havrylko, Beibei Xu, Iryna Yepifanova, Shiwei Zhu, Nataliia Bieliaieva, Bakhyt Yeraliyeva121-129
-
INTERFACE LAYOUT VERSUS EFFICIENCY OF INFORMATION ASSIMILATION IN THE LEARNING PROCESS
Julia Zachwatowicz, Oliwia Zioło, Mariusz Dzieńkowski130-135
-
AUTOMATED WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH AI-BASED DE-MAND PREDICTION
Arman Mohammad Nakib136-140
-
UML DIAGRAMS OF THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF MAINTENANCE STATIONS
Lyudmila Samchuk, Yuliia Povstiana141-145
-
DEFECT SEVERITY CODE PREDICTION BASED ON ENSEMBLE LEARNING
Ghada Mohammad Tahir Aldabbagh, Safwan Omar Hasoon146-153
-
AFFORDABLE AUGMENTED REALITY FOR SPINE SURGERY: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION INTO IMPROVING VISUALIZATION AND SURGICAL ACCURACY
Iqra Aslam, Muhammad Jasim Saeed, Zarmina Jahangir, Kanza Zafar, Muhammad Awais Sattar154-163
Archives
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2025-09-30 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2025-06-27 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2025-03-31 26
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2024-12-21 25
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2024-09-30 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2024-06-30 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2024-03-31 23
-
Vol. 13 No. 4
2023-12-20 24
-
Vol. 13 No. 3
2023-09-30 25
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-06-30 14
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2023-03-31 12
-
Vol. 12 No. 4
2022-12-30 16
-
Vol. 12 No. 3
2022-09-30 15
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2022-06-30 16
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2022-03-31 9
-
Vol. 10 No. 4
2020-12-20 16
-
Vol. 10 No. 3
2020-09-30 22
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2020-06-30 16
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2020-03-30 19
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
mabroukkhemliche@univ-setif.dz
Abstract
The importance of solar energy is manifested in the growing demand for renewable energy sources around the world, which is fueled by environmental concern and the scarcity of conventional energy. Maximum power point trackers (MPPTS) are necessary in solar energy systems due to atmospheric changes that threaten the efficiency of solar energy systems. This article compares MPPT technologies. Including traditional and modern techniques, and despite the results achieved by classical techniques in maximizing and extracting as much energy as possible, they face a big problem in reaching the bone energy point. These provide modern technologies such as FLC and SMC. They provide exceptional accuracy and excellent response in all environmental conditions but come with additional complexity and higher cost. These technologies are ideal in applications that require high performance under continuously changing conditions or in difficult environments (such as large solar power systems or systems dealing with large fluctuations in illumination). This research aims to conduct a comprehensive study and compare of classical technologies (P&O and IncCond) and modern technologies sliding mode control (SMC, Fuzzy Logic Control – FLC), taking into account factors such as efficiency, complexity and response time. Tests were conducted under different climatic conditions to understand and enhance the efficiency of MPPT technologies. Our study highlights the enhanced performance for methods based on modern technologies. This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis, and by improving the efficiency and reliability of solar energy systems, our research supports the advancement of sustainable energy solutions.
Keywords:
References
[1] Ahmad F. F. et al.: Application of sliding mode control for maximum power point tracking of solar photovoltaic systems: A comprehensive review. Annu Rev Control 49, 2020, 173–196 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j. arcontrol.2020.04.011]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.011
[2] Bait F., Latreche S., Khemliche M.: Simulation of different faults in photovoltaic installation. 19th IEEE International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices – SSD 2022, May 2022, 1130–1138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD54932.2022.9955851
[3] Belkaid A. et al.: Improving PV system performance using high efficiency fuzzy logic control. 8th International Conference on Smart Grid (icSmartGrid), 2020, 152–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/icSmartGrid49881.2020.9144817
[4] Chen J. H., Yau H. T., Hung W.: Design and Study on Sliding Mode Extremum Seeking Control of the Chaos Embedded Particle Swarm Optimization for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Wind Power Systems. Energies 7(3), 2014, 1706–1720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en7031706
[5] Derri M. et al.: Maximum Power Point Tracking using Fuzzy Logic Controller for Stand Alone photovoltaic System. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology 3(11), 2014, 1721–1725.
[6] Djalab A., Teta A., Rezaoui M. M.: Analysis of MPPT Methods: P&O, INC and Fuzzy Logic (CLF) for a PV System. 6th International Conference on Control Engineering & Information Technology (CEIT). Turkey, Istanbul, 2018, 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIT.2018.8751820
[7] D'Souza N. S., Lopes A. L., Liu X.: Comparative study of variable size perturbation and observation maximum power point trackers for PV systems. Electric Power Systems Research 80(3), 2010, 296–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2009.09.012
[8] Fei J., Chen Y., Liu L., Fang Y.: Fuzzy multiple hidden layer recurrent neural control of nonlinear system using terminal sliding-mode controller. IEEE transactions on cybernetics 2021, 1–16.
[9] Haji D., Genc N.: Fuzzy and P&O based MPPT controllers under different conditions. 7th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA). 2018, 649–655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRERA.2018.8566943
[10] Jain K., Gupta M., Bohre A. K.: Implementation and comparative analysis of P&O and INC MPPT method for PV system. 8th IEEE India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE). India, Jaipur, 2018, 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IICPE.2018.8709519
[11] Kish G. J., Lee J. J., Lehn P.W.: Modelling and control of photovoltaic panels utilising the incremental conductance method for maximum power point tracking. IET Renewable Power Generation 6, 2012, 259–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2011.0052
[12] Latreche S., Badoud A. E., Khemliche M.: Implementation of MPPT algorithm and supervision of shading on photovoltaic module. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research 8(6), 2018, 3541–3544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2354
[13] Levron Y., Shmilovitz D.: Maximum power point tracking employing sliding mode control. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers 60(3), 2013, 724–732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2012.2215760
[14] Moradi M. H. et al.: A robust hybrid method for maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic systems. Sol. Energy 94, 2013, 266–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.05.016
[15] Ram J. K. et al.: Performance enhancement of solar PV systems applying P&O assisted Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA). Sol. Energy 199, 2020, 214–229 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.019
[16] Salah B. C., Ouali M.: Comparison of fuzzy logic and neural network in maximum power point tracker for PV systems. Electric Power Systems Resarch 81, 2011, 43–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2010.07.005
[17] Tey K. S., Mekhilef S.: Modified incremental conductance MPPT algorithm to mitigate inaccurate responses under fast-changing solar irradiation level. Sol. Energy 101, 2014, 333–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.01.003
[18] Zhu Y., Fei J.: Adaptive Global Fast Terminal Sliding Mode Control of Grid connected Photovoltaic System Using Fuzzy Neural Network Approach. IEEE Access 5, 2017, 9476–9484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2707668
Article Details
Abstract views: 280
Mabrouk Khemliche, Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1 University-UFAS, Electrical Engineering Department, Automatic Laboratory of Sétif-LAS
Researcher at Ferhat Abbas University of Setif

