INTERFACE LAYOUT VERSUS EFFICIENCY OF INFORMATION ASSIMILATION IN THE LEARNING PROCESS
Julia Zachwatowicz
Lublin University of Technology, Department of Computer Science (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7385-7802
Oliwia Zioło
Lublin University of Technology, Department of Computer Science (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4445-7156
Mariusz Dzieńkowski
m.dzienkowski@pollub.plLublin University of Technology, Department of Computer Science (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1932-297X
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to study the impact of different ways of presenting educational content found on websites on the ability to assimilate information among elementary school students. To conduct the study, three websites with interface layouts different in terms of levels of complexity were prepared: a simple, a moderate and a complex one. Each site contained the same educational materials. Seventy-two students from elementary school grades IV-VI participated in the study. All the students were divided into 3 groups, each of which worked with one version of the website. At the first stage, students were tasked with familiarizing themselves with the content of the web pages within a given website. This was followed by a knowledge quiz, checking how much information the subjects had memorized. At the last stage, participants of the experiment completed a questionnaire collecting their opinions on their preferences regarding the form of presentation of educational content made available online. The obtained results and the conducted analysis show the interface with the moderate level of complexity, i.e. with a relatively simple layout and without an excessive number of elements, allows for the assimilation of the most information. The interface was also rated the highest by the participants of the study.
Keywords:
child-computer interaction, memorability, memorization efficiency, interface layout, website evaluationReferences
[1] Betts J., McKay J., Maruff P., Anderson V.: The Development of Sustained Attention in Children: The Effect of Age and Task Load. Child Neuropsychology 12(3), 2006, 205–221 [https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040500488522].
Google Scholar
[2] Druin, A.: The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 21(1), 2002, 1–25 [https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290210147484].
Google Scholar
[3] Gasah M., Mat Zain N. H., Baharum A.: An approach in creating positive emotion for children’s e-learning based on user interface design. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 13(3), 2019, 1267–1273 [https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v13.i3.pp1267-1273].
Google Scholar
[4] Hasani L. M., Sensude D. I., Kautsarina, Suryono R. R.: User-Centered Design of e-Learning User Interfaces: A Survey of the Practices. 3rd International Conference on Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE). Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 2020, 1–7 [https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2IE50715.2020.9274623].
Google Scholar
[5] Hasani L. M., Santoso H. B., Isal R. Y. K.: Designing Alternative Interface Design of e-Learning Modules based on Felder-Silverman Learning Styles and User Centered Design Approach. International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and information Systems (ICACSIS). Indonesia, Bali, 2019, 459–464 [https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS47736.2019.8979717].
Google Scholar
[6] Holloway D. J., Green L. R., Brady D. J.: 0-8: Young children's Internet use. Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Conference. Australia, Fremantle, 2013, 1–11 [https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2013/261/] (available: 10.11.2024).
Google Scholar
[7] Hourcade J. P.: Child-Computer Interaction (Second Edition), 2022 [https://homepage.cs.uiowa.edu/~hourcade/book/index.php] (available: 10.11.2024).
Google Scholar
[8] Kresteva N.: Existing Dangers for the Child on the Internet. International conference knowledge-based organization 24(2), 2018, 206–211 [https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2018-0091].
Google Scholar
[9] Nordin H., Singh D., Mansor Z.: Interface Design for E-Learning: Investigating Design Characteristics of Colour and Graphic Elements for Generation Z. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems 15(9), 2021, 3169–3185 [https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2021.09.005].
Google Scholar
[10] Nordin H., Singh D., Mansor Z., Yadegaridehkordi E.: Impact of Power Distance Cultural Dimension in E-Learning Interface Design Among Malaysian Generation Z Students. IEEE Access 10, 2022, 64199–64208.
Google Scholar
[11] Muhammad A. H., Siddique A., Youssef A. E., Saleem K., Shahzad B., Akram A., Al-Thnian A. S.: A Hierarchical Model to Evaluate the Quality of Web-Based E-Learning Systems. Sustainability 12(10), 2020, 1–23 [https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104071].
Google Scholar
[12] Oktavia T., Ciuputra H., Tianwin J. Steven, Juneio Sembiring V. A., Ananta Z. R.: The Effectiveness of Free Online Learning. 10th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS). Indonesia, Bandung, 2023, 1–8 [https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ICISS59129.2023.10291606].
Google Scholar
[13] Osmulska A., Kaliszuk J., Plachewska-Wójcik M., Dzieńkowski M.: Comparative analysis of web application interfaces with buttons in graphical and text form for universal design. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute 25, 288–296 [https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2997].
Google Scholar
[14] Patra I. et al.: Scrutinizing the Effects of e-Learning on Enhancing EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Reading Motivation. Education Research International 2, 2022, 1–11 [https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4481453].
Google Scholar
[15] Schepers S., Dreessen K., Zaman B.: Rethinking children’s roles in Participatory Design: The child as a process designer. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 16, 2018, 47–54 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.12.001].
Google Scholar
[16] Sherwin K., Nielsen J.: Children’s UX: Usability Issues in Designing for Young People. Nielsen Norman Group, 2019 [https://www.nngroup.com/articles/childrens-websites-usability-issues/] (available: 10.11.2024).
Google Scholar
[17] Shibani A. S., Mohd M., Ghani A., Zakaria M., Al.-Ghuribi S.: Identification of Critical Parameters Affecting an E-Learning Recommendation Model Using Delphi Method Based on Expert Validation. Information 14(4), 2023, 207 [https://doi.org/10.3390/info14040207].
Google Scholar
Authors
Julia ZachwatowiczLublin University of Technology, Department of Computer Science Poland
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7385-7802
Authors
Oliwia ZiołoLublin University of Technology, Department of Computer Science Poland
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4445-7156
Authors
Mariusz Dzieńkowskim.dzienkowski@pollub.pl
Lublin University of Technology, Department of Computer Science Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1932-297X
Statistics
Abstract views: 0PDF downloads: 0
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Dominik Choma, Kinga Chwaleba, Mariusz Dzieńkowski, THE EFFICIENCY AND RELIABILITY OF BACKEND TECHNOLOGIES: EXPRESS, DJANGO, AND SPRING BOOT , Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska: Vol. 13 No. 4 (2023)
- Marcin Cieśla, Mariusz Dzieńkowski, AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ACCESSIBILITY TOOLS ON WEBSITES , Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska: Vol. 13 No. 4 (2023)