AFFORDABLE AUGMENTED REALITY FOR SPINE SURGERY: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION INTO IMPROVING VISUALIZATION AND SURGICAL ACCURACY
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 14 No. 4 (2024)
-
IDENTIFICATION OF AN ARBITRARY SHAPE RIGID OBSTACLE ILLUMINATED BY FLAT ACOUSTIC WAVE USING NEAR FIELD DATA
Tomasz Rymarczyk, Jan Sikora5-9
-
RADIO FREQUENCY BASED INPAINTING FOR INDOOR LOCALIZATION USING MEMORYLESS TECHNIQUES AND WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY
Tammineni Shanmukha Prasanthi, Swarajya Madhuri Rayavarapu, Gottapu Sasibhushana Rao, Raj Kumar Goswami, Gottapu Santosh Kumar10-15
-
INTELLIGENT MATCHING TECHNIQUE FOR FLEXIBLE ANTENNAS
Olena Semenova, Andriy Semenov, Stefan Meulesteen, Natalia Kryvinska, Hanna Pastushenko16-22
-
DIFFERENTIAL MUELLER-MATRIX MAPPING OF THE POLYCRYSTALLINE COMPONENT OF BIOLOGICAL TISSUES OF HUMAN ORGANS
Andrei Padure, Oksana Bakun, Ivan Mikirin, Oleksandr Dubolazov, Iryna Soltys, Oleksandr Olar, Yuriy Ushenko, Oleksandr Ushenko, Irina Palii, Saule Kumargazhanova23-27
-
POLARIZATION SELECTOR ON WAVEGUIDES PARTIALLY FILLED BY DIELECTRIC
Vitaly Pochernyaev, Nataliia Syvkova, Mariia Mahomedova28-31
-
FUNCTIONALLY INTEGRATED DEVICE FOR TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT
Les Hotra, Oksana Boyko, Igor Helzhynskyy, Hryhorii Barylo, Marharyta Rozhdestvenska, Halyna Lastivka32-37
-
STUDY OF THE OZONE CONTROL PROCESS USING ELECTRONIC SENSORS
Sunggat Marxuly, Askar Abdykadyrov, Katipa Chezhimbayeva, Nurzhigit Smailov38-45
-
OPTIMIZING WIND POWER PLANTS: COMPARATIVE ENHANCEMENT IN LOW WIND SPEED ENVIRONMENTS
Mustafa Hussein Ibrahim, Muhammed A. Ibrahim, Salam Ibrahim Khather46-51
-
PV SYSTEM MPPT CONTROL: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF P&O, INCCOND, SMC AND FLC ALGORITHMS
Khoukha Bouguerra, Samia Latreche, Hamza Khemlche, Mabrouk Khemliche52-62
-
DSTATCOM-BASED 15 LEVEL ASYMMETRICAL MULTILEVEL INVERTER FOR IMPROVING POWER QUALITY
Panneerselvam Sundaramoorthi, Govindasamy Saravana Venkatesh63-70
-
COMPUTER SIMULATION OF A SUPERCONDUCTING TRANSFORMER SHORT-CIRCUIT
Leszek Jaroszyński71-74
-
AI-BASED FIELD-ORIENTED CONTROL FOR INDUCTION MOTORS
Elmehdi Benmalek, Marouane Rayyam, Ayoub Gege, Omar Ennasiri, Adil Ezzaidi75-81
-
INVESTIGATION OF CHANGES IN THE LEVEL OF NETWORK SECURITY BASED ON A COGNITIVE APPROACH
Olha Saliieva, Yurii Yaremchuk82-85
-
THE UTILIZATION OF MACHINE LEARNING FOR NETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS
Ahmad Sanmorino, Herri Setiawan, John Roni Coyanda86-89
-
USING SUPPORT VECTORS TO BUILD A RULE-BASED SYSTEM FOR DETECTING MALICIOUS PROCESSES IN AN ORGANISATION'S NETWORK TRAFFIC
Halyna Haidur, Sergii Gakhov, Dmytro Hamza90-96
-
EXTRACTING EMOTION-CAUSE PAIRS: A BILSTM-DRIVEN METHODOLOGY
Raga Madhuri Chandra, Giri Venkata Sai Tej Neelaiahgari, Satya Sumanth Vanapalli97-103
-
IMPROVING α-PARAMETERIZED DIFFERENTIAL TRANSFORM METHOD WITH DANDELION OPTIMIZER FOR SOLVING ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Mustafa Raed Najeeb, Omar Saber Qasim104-108
-
THE METHOD OF ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL CODING TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF VIDEO IMAGES
Volodymyr Barannik, Dmytro Havrylov, Serhii Pantas, Yurii Tsimura, Tatayna Belikova, Rimma Viedienieva, Vasyl Kryshtal109-114
-
OPTIMIZING TIME SERIES FORECASTING: LEVERAGING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR ENHANCED PREDICTIVE ACCURACY
Waldemar Wójcik, Assem Shayakhmetova, Ardak Akhmetova, Assel Abdildayeva, Galymzhan Nurtugan115-120
-
SYNCHRONIZATION OF EVENT-DRIVEN MANAGEMENT DURING DATA COLLECTION
Valeriy Kuzminykh, Oleksandr Koval, Yevhen Havrylko, Beibei Xu, Iryna Yepifanova, Shiwei Zhu, Nataliia Bieliaieva, Bakhyt Yeraliyeva121-129
-
INTERFACE LAYOUT VERSUS EFFICIENCY OF INFORMATION ASSIMILATION IN THE LEARNING PROCESS
Julia Zachwatowicz, Oliwia Zioło, Mariusz Dzieńkowski130-135
-
AUTOMATED WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH AI-BASED DE-MAND PREDICTION
Arman Mohammad Nakib136-140
-
UML DIAGRAMS OF THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF MAINTENANCE STATIONS
Lyudmila Samchuk, Yuliia Povstiana141-145
-
DEFECT SEVERITY CODE PREDICTION BASED ON ENSEMBLE LEARNING
Ghada Mohammad Tahir Aldabbagh, Safwan Omar Hasoon146-153
-
AFFORDABLE AUGMENTED REALITY FOR SPINE SURGERY: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION INTO IMPROVING VISUALIZATION AND SURGICAL ACCURACY
Iqra Aslam, Muhammad Jasim Saeed, Zarmina Jahangir, Kanza Zafar, Muhammad Awais Sattar154-163
Archives
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2025-09-30 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2025-06-27 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2025-03-31 26
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2024-12-21 25
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2024-09-30 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2024-06-30 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2024-03-31 23
-
Vol. 13 No. 4
2023-12-20 24
-
Vol. 13 No. 3
2023-09-30 25
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-06-30 14
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2023-03-31 12
-
Vol. 12 No. 4
2022-12-30 16
-
Vol. 12 No. 3
2022-09-30 15
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2022-06-30 16
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2022-03-31 9
-
Vol. 10 No. 4
2020-12-20 16
-
Vol. 10 No. 3
2020-09-30 22
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2020-06-30 16
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2020-03-30 19
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
zarmina.jahangir@riphah.edu.pk
Abstract
The minimally invasive spine surgery, sometimes referred to as MISS, has changed spinal therapy by minimizing the length of time required for recovery, as well as the amount of worry and suffering that patients experience. Before we can consider the surgery to have been successful, there is a critical problem that has to be addressed. The use of augmented reality technology has been gaining traction over the course of the last few years as a method of improving the accuracy of MISS management. This research has a significant focus on the applications of augmented reality in minimally invasive spine surgery as its core investigation. The use of augmented reality (AR) technology, which supports medical professionals in performing difficult spine procedures, allows for the provision of real-time placement suggestions as well as information that is specific to the patient. This has a number of major benefits, some of which include improved vision, more accurate tool placement, and less problems. In order to include augmented reality into MISS, it was necessary to have a user interface that was easy to use, a data integration system that was comprehensive, and recording mechanisms that were reliable. It is necessary to make the necessary modifications to the registration process, delays, and physical issues before bringing it into clinical practice. This procedure must be completed before it can be implemented. In the context of this research project, an application for smartphones that is integrated with augmented reality is currently being created with the purpose of boosting minimally invasive spine surgery. "The innovation of this research is the creation of a mobile AR interface that bridges the gap between accessibility and high-quality surgical visualization tools, offering an alternative to traditional AR systems." This AR smartphone application is the first of its type to combine cost, accessibility, and sophisticated visualization features, resulting in a whole new approach to surgical help that is unlike any other surgical procedure.Using Unity3D, the Vuforia AR camera, and C#, the software is able to create an augmented reality (AR) experience for mobile devices. This objective is realized via the utilization of these three components. Technology that are regarded to be industry standards include HoloLens and head-mounted displays (HMDs), which are examples of augmented reality technology. On the other hand, the vast majority of people are unable to make use of them because of the tremendous cost that they carry. When it comes to visualizing three-dimensional MRI spine pictures, this technology offers an approach that is more efficient and economical. Taking into consideration the results of this study, it would seem that surveys and formal evaluations that make use of MISS and augmented reality might possibly be beneficial. By using augmented reality (AR), medical practitioners may be able to more effectively see important structures, plan surgical operations, and identify the required equipment, which may eventually result in improved patient outcomes. Increasing the capabilities of augmented reality technology, finding new uses for it, and incorporating artificial intelligence-driven decision improvement are the goals of the researchers.
Keywords:
References
[1] Avrumova F., Lebl D. R.: Augmented reality for minimally invasive spinal surgery. Frontiers in Surgery 9, 2023, 1086988 [https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1086988]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1086988
[2] Benmahdjoub M., van Walsum T., van Twisk P., Wolvius E. B.: Augmented reality in craniomaxillofacial surgery: Added value and proposed recommendations through a systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 50, 2021, 969–978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.11.015
[3] Brebant V., Heine N., Lamby P., Heidekrueger P. I., Forte A. J., Prantl L., Aung T.: Augmented reality of indocyanine green fluorescence in simplified lymphovenous anastomosis in lymphatic surgery. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 3, 2019, 125–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-199220
[4] Brockmeyer P., Wiechens B., Schliephake H.: The role of augmented reality in the advancement of minimally invasive surgery procedures: A scoping review. Bioengineering 10(4), 2023, 501 [https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10040501]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10040501
[5] Butler A. J., Colman M. W., Lynch J., Phillips F. M.: Augmented reality in minimally invasive spine surgery: Early efficiency and complications of percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine J. 23, 2023, 27–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.09.008
[6] Chauvet P. et al.: Augmented reality with diffusion tensor imaging and tractography during laparoscopic myomectomies. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 27, 2020, 973–976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.007
[7] Chen F., Cui X., Han B., Liu J., Zhang X., Liao H.: Augmented reality navigation for minimally invasive knee surgery using enhanced arthroscopy. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 201, 2021, 105952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105952
[8] Eckert M., Volmerg J. S., Friedrich C. M.: Augmented reality in medicine: Systematic and bibliographic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 7(4), 2019, e10967 [https://doi.org/10.2196/10967]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/10967
[9] Felix B. et al.: Augmented reality spine surgery navigation: Increasing pedicle screw insertion accuracy for both open and minimally invasive spine surgeries. Spine. 47, 2022, 865–872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004338
[10] Forte M. P., Gourishetti R., Javot B., Engler T., Gomez E. D., Kuchenbecker K. J.: Design of interactive augmented reality functions for robotic surgery and evaluation in dry-lab lymphadenectomy. Int. J. Med. Robot. 18, 2022, e2351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2351
[11] Godzik J., Farber S. H., Urakov T., Steinberger J., Knipscher L. J., Ehredt R. B., Tumialán L. M., Uribe J. S.: "Disruptive technology" in spine surgery and education: Virtual and augmented reality. Oper. Neurosurg. 21, 2021, S85–S93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab114
[12] Gholizadeh M. et al.: Minimally invasive and invasive liver surgery based on augmented reality training: a review of the literature. J Robot Surg. 17(3), 2023, 753–763 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01499-2]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01499-2
[13] Gribaudo M., Piazzolla P., Porpiglia F., Vezzetti E., Violante M. G.: 3D augmentation of the surgical video stream: Toward a modular approach. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 191, 2020, 105505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105505
[14] Hersh A. et al.: Augmented reality in spine surgery: A narrative review. HSS J. 17(3), 2021, 351–358 [https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316211028595]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316211028595
[15] Huang X. et al.: Augmented reality surgical navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery: A preclinical study. Bioengineering 10, 2023, 1094 [https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091094]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091094
[16] Hussain R., Lalande A., Guigou C., Bozorg-Grayeli A.: Contribution of augmented reality to minimally invasive computer-assisted cranial base surgery. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 24, 2020, 2093–2106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2019.2954003
[17] Jia T., Taylor Z. A., Chen X.: Long term and robust 6DoF motion tracking for highly dynamic stereo endoscopy videos. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 94, 2021, 101995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101995
[18] Lecointre L. et al.: Robotically assisted augmented reality system for identification of targeted lymph nodes in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A first step toward the identification of sentinel node. Surg. Endosc. 36, 2022, 9224–9233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09409-1
[19] Lee C., Wong G. K.: Virtual reality and augmented reality in the management of intracranial tumors: A review. J. Clin. Neurosci. 62, 2019, 14–20 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.12.036]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.12.036
[20] Lee D., Yi J. W., Hong J., Chai Y. J., Kim H. C., Kong H. J.: Augmented reality to localize individual organ in surgical procedure. Healthc Inform Res. 24(4), 2018, 394-401 [https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2018.24.4.394]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2018.24.4.394
[21] Liang S.: Research proposal on reviewing augmented reality applications for supporting ageing population. Procedia Manufacturing 3, 2015, 219-226 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.132]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.132
[22] Li R. et al.: Accurate and robust feature description and dense point-wise matching based on feature fusion for endoscopic images. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 94, 2021, 102007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.102007
[23] Pelargos P. E. et al.: Utilizing virtual and augmented reality for educational and clinical enhancements in neurosurgery. J. Clin. Neurosci. 35, 2017, 1–4 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.002]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.002
[24] Pratt P., Arora A.: Transoral robotic surgery: Image guidance and augmented reality. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 80, 2018, 204–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000489467
[25] Rush A. J. 3rd., Shepard N., Nolte M., Siemionow K., Phillips F.: Augmented reality in spine surgery: Current state of the art. Int. J. Spine Surg. 16, 2022, S22–S27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8273
[26] Spirina Y., Samoilova I., Kazimova D., Selezneva R., Polupan K.: Using the Unity 3D environment and the Vuforia plugin to develop an AR application. Trudy Universiteta 1(90), 2023, 378–384 [https://doi.org/10.52209/1609-1825_2023_1_378]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52209/1609-1825_2023_1_378
[27] Stewart C. L. et al.: Study on augmented reality for robotic surgery bedside assistants. J. Robot. Surg. 16, 2022, 1019–1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01335-z
[28] Thabit A. et al.: Augmented reality navigation for minimally invasive craniosynostosis surgery: A phantom study. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 17, 2022, 1453–1460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02634-y
[29] Wang R., Zhang M., Meng X., Geng Z., Wang F.Y.: 3-D tracking for augmented reality using combined region and dense cues in endoscopic surgery. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 22, 2018, 1540–1551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2017.2770214
[30] Wendler T., van Leeuwen F. W. B., Navab N., van Oosterom M. N.: How molecular imaging will enable robotic precision surgery: The role of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and navigation. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 48, 2021, 4201–4224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05445-6
[31] Wild C. et al.: Telestration with augmented reality for visual presentation of intraoperative target structures in minimally invasive surgery: A randomized controlled study. Surg. Endosc. 36, 2022, 7453–7461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09158-1
[32] Xu L. et al.: Information loss challenges in surgical navigation systems: From information fusion to AI-based approaches. Inf. Fusion. 92, 2023, 13–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.11.015
[33] Yuk F. J., Maragkos G. A., Sato K., Steinberger J.: Current innovation in virtual and augmented reality in spine surgery. Ann. Transl. Med. 9, 2021, 94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1132
Article Details
Abstract views: 345
Iqra Aslam, Riphah International University
Holds an M.Sc. in computer science from Riphah International University, Lahore Campus, and a B.Sc. in computer science from Lahore College for Women University, Lahore. With a solid academic background, her key interests include application development, computer vision, and machine learning. Passionate about using her skills in these areas to create new technology solutions and support research in computer science.
Muhammad Jasim Saeed, Riphah International University
Received the M.Sc. degree in computer science from Liverpool John Moores University, U.K., and the Ph.D. degree in computer communications and networks from Manchester Metropolitan University, U.K. Currently, he holds the position of an assistant professor and the Head of the Department of Computing, Riphah International University, Lahore Campus, Pakistan.
Zarmina Jahangir, Riphah International University
Has an extensive background in computer science with an M.Sc. degree from FAST-NU and a Ph.D. scholar specializing in Software Engineering from COMSATS. With a strong academic foundation and a passion for research, her key interests lie in Software Engineering and Machine Learning.
Kanza Zafar, Riphah International University
A Ph.D. Scholar in Computing at Riphah International University. She has done B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Computer Engineering from Sir Syed University of Engineering Technology, Karachi. Currently, she is serving as Senior Lecturer at Riphah International University, Lahore Campus. Her research areas are Computer Networks and Information & Cyber Secuirty.

