ZINTEGROWANY PROCES DECYZYJNY UWZGLĘDNIAJĄCY RYZYKO W PRZEMYŚLE JĄDROWYM
Mieczysław Józef Borysiewicz
manhaz@cyf.gov.plNational Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland (Polska)
Karol Kowal
National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland (Polska)
Piotr Prusiński
National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland (Polska)
Marcin Dąbrowski
National Atomic Energy Agency (NAEA), Department of Nuclear Safety, Division of Inspection of Nuclear Installations, Poland (Polska)
Abstrakt
Organ regulacyjny, powołany w celu zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa jądrowego, jest odpowiedzialny za podejmowanie decyzji i wprowadzanie rozporządzeń dla przemysłu jądrowego. Tradycyjny sposób jego funkcjonowania opiera się na deterministycznym podejściu do analiz bezpieczeństwa. Rozwój analiz probabilistycznych (PSA) sprawia jednak, iż są one traktowane jako podejście komplementarne. Nowa koncepcja IAEA, opisana w tym artykule, polega na zintegrowanym podejściu, uwzględniającym analizy deterministyczne, probabilistyczne i inne aspekty procesu decyzyjnego.
Słowa kluczowe:
bezpieczeństwo jądrowe, proces decyzyjny, ryzyko, probabilistyczne analizy bezpieczeństwa (PSA), deterministyczne analizy bezpieczeństwa (DSA)Bibliografia
Ahn B.S., Park K.S.: Comparing methods for multi-attribute decision making with ordinal weights. Computers and Operations Research 35/2008, pp. 1660-1670.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.09.026
Google Scholar
Borysiewicz M., Furtek A., Potempski S.: Poradnik metod ocen ryzyka związanego z niebezpiecznymi instalacjami procesowymi. Instytut Energii Atomowej, Otwock-Świerk 2000.
Google Scholar
Borysiewicz M., Kowal K., Potempski S.: Decision making for safety of technological installations based on risk. Proceedings of the XIX ScientificTechnical Seminar of Materials Investigation for Power Industry, Zakopane 2012, pp. 209-219.
Google Scholar
Cooke R.M.: Experts in Uncertainty. Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991.
Google Scholar
Govaerts P.: Roles, functions and value of TSOs. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 49-54.
Google Scholar
Hahn L.: Independent technical and scientific advice for regulatory decision making. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 55-65.
Google Scholar
Jia J., Fisher G.W., Dyer J.S.: Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 11/1998, pp. 85-105.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199806)11:2<85::AID-BDM282>3.0.CO;2-K
Google Scholar
Knudsen J.K., Smith C.L.: Estimation of system failure probability uncertainty including model success criteria. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PSA and Management, San Juan 2002, pp. 201-206.
Google Scholar
Ko K.S., Han K.I.: Relevance of TSOs in providing technical and scientific services to operators/industry. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 67-85.
Google Scholar
Lee J.C., McCormick N.J.: Risk and Safety Analysis of Nuclear Systems. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken 2011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118043462
Google Scholar
Lyubarskiy A., Kuzmina I., El-Shanawany M.: Advances in Risk Informed Decision Making – IAEA’s Approach. Proceedings of the Nordic PSA Conference, Gottröra 2011, pp. 1-14.
Google Scholar
Małecki L.: Introduction to the nuclear energy in Poland. Proceedings of the XIX Scientific-Technical Seminar of Materials Investigation for Power Industry, Zakopane 2012, pp. 1-40.
Google Scholar
Rao K.D., Kushwaha H.S., Verma A.K., Srividya A.: Quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 92/2009, pp. 947-956.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.07.002
Google Scholar
Strupczewski A.: Safety classification of nuclear power plants structures, systems and components and their qualification. Proceedings of the XIX Scientific-Technical Seminar of Materials Investigation for Power Industry, Zakopane 2012, pp. 57-84.
Google Scholar
Valtonen K., Vanttola T.: Role of the TSO in public information/debate openness, transparency. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 97-102.
Google Scholar
Volkanovski A., Čepin M.: Implication of PSA uncertainties on risk-informed decision making. Nuclear Engineering and Design 241/2011, pp. 1108-1113.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.02.041
Google Scholar
Xuan S.: A Novel Kind of Decision of Weight of Multi-attribute DecisionMaking Model Based on Bayesian Networks. International Seminar on Business and Information Management 2/2008, pp. 30-33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBIM.2008.94
Google Scholar
Health and Safety Executive: The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations. HSE Books, Sudbury 1992.
Google Scholar
Health and Safety Executive: Reducing Risks, Protecting People: HSE’s decision-making process. HSE Books, Norwich 2001.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Equipment qualification in operational nuclear power plants: upgrading, preserving and reviewing. IAEA, Vienna 1998.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Basic safety principles for nuclear power plants. IAEA, Vienna 1999.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Quality assurance within regulatory bodies. IAEA, Vienna 1999.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Operational safety performance indicators for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2000.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Training the staff of the regulatory body for nuclear facilities: A competency framework. IAEA, Vienna 2001.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Safety Margins of Operating Reactors. IAEA, Vienna 2003.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Precursor analyses – The use of deterministic and PSA based methods in the event investigation process at nuclear power plants. IAEA, Vienna 2004.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Assessment of Defence in Depth for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2005.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Defence in Depth in Nuclear Safety. IAEA, Vienna 2005.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Risk informed regulation of nuclear facilities: Overview of the current status. IAEA, Vienna 2005.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: IAEA Safety Glossary – Terminology Used In Nuclear Safety And Radiation Protection. IAEA, Vienna 2007.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Deterministic Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2009.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Safety assessment for facilities and activities. IAEA, Vienna 2009.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Development and Application of Level-1 PSA. IAEA, Vienna 2010.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Development and Application of Level-2 PSA. IAEA, Vienna 2010.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: The Interface Between Safety and Security at Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2010.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: A Framework for an Integrated Risk Informed Decision Making Process. IAEA, Vienna 2011.
Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency: Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design. IAEA, Vienna 2012.
Google Scholar
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Reactor Safety Study - An assessment of accident risks in U. S. commercial nuclear power plants. U.S. NRC, Washington D. C. 1975.
Google Scholar
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Safety goals for nuclear power plants operations. USNRC, Washington 1996.
Google Scholar
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Guidance on the Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decision Making. US NRC, Washington 2009.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Mieczysław Józef Borysiewiczmanhaz@cyf.gov.pl
National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland Polska
Autorzy
Karol KowalNational Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland Polska
Autorzy
Piotr PrusińskiNational Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland Polska
Autorzy
Marcin DąbrowskiNational Atomic Energy Agency (NAEA), Department of Nuclear Safety, Division of Inspection of Nuclear Installations, Poland Polska
Statystyki
Abstract views: 193PDF downloads: 145
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.
Inne teksty tego samego autora
- Karol Kowal, Mieczysław Borysiewicz, ANALIZA NIEZAWODNOŚCI SYSTEMU ZABEZPIECZENIA REAKTORA TYPU PWR , Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska: Tom 5 Nr 1 (2015)
- Mieczysław Józef Borysiewicz, Karol Kowal, Piotr Andrzej Prusiński, Marcin Dąbrowski, ZASTOSOWANIE IRIDM W PROCESIE DECYZYJNYM DOTYCZĄCYM KONWERSJI PALIWA W REAKTORZE MARIA , Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska: Tom 3 Nr 3 (2013)
- Tomasz Pikula, Karol Kowal, Piotr Guzdek, ZALEŻNOŚĆ CZĘSTOTLIWOŚCIOWA NAPIĘCIOWEGO WSPÓŁCZYNNIKA MAGNETOELEKTRYCZNEGO W CERAMIKACH (BiFeO3)x-(BaTiO3)1-x , Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska: Tom 5 Nr 4 (2015)
- Karol Kowal, Mieczysław Borysiewicz, ANALIZA NIEZAWODNOŚCI AWARYJNEGO ODBIORU CIEPŁA POWYŁĄCZENIOWEGO W REAKTORZE TYPU PWR , Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska: Tom 5 Nr 3 (2015)