Technological Artifices: Good Practices for Inclusive Communication in Museums
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 13 (2022)
-
An Intricate Encounter? Cultural Significance and Accessibility in the Conservation of the Nineteenth- and Twentieth Century Monuments of Thessaloniki
Dimitrios Zygomalas7-24
-
Technological Artifices: Good Practices for Inclusive Communication in Museums
Gianluca D'Agostino, Cristina Boido25-36
-
Communicating a Conservation-Restoration Project: The Case of Chapel of Original Sin at the Sacro Monte di Varallo
Greta Acuto37-50
-
Accessibility of Cultural Heritage
Calogero Bellanca, Susana Mora Alonso-Muñoyerro, Cecilia Antonini Lanari51-68
-
Accessibility and Enhancement of Cultural Heritage: Examples of Best Practices in Europe
Rosa Anna Genovese69-84
-
Conservation Theory and the Accessibility of Monuments /on the Example of the High Castle in Malbork/
Grzegorz Bukal, Agnieszka Kowalska85-100
-
Authenticity and Interpretation for the Personal Appropriation of Heritage in Museums
Michela Benente, Valeria Minucciani101-110
-
The Role of Local Communities in the Discourse of Controversial Heritage of Norway and Estonia
Ave Paulus, Arnstein Bard Brekke111-128
-
Accessibility to the New Geoparq of Siurana
Josep Maria Adell-Argilés, Susana Mora Alonso-Muñoyerro, Dolores De La Piedra Gordo, Miguel García Jiménez, Edgar Lombana Echeverry129-142
-
From "Lodz Art" to "Friendly City". Good Practices or New Quality in the Dissemination of Cultural Assets?
Aneta Pawłowska, Daria Rutkowska-Siuda, Paulina Długosz143-158
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The article presents the wide variety of technologies and their applications in museums, referring to museums of different typologies, including archaeological ones. With their potentialities and constraints, the selected technologies – from Virtual Reality to interactive systems – show a range of uses and approaches that somehow aim to be inclusive. Technological artifices can create new ‘narrative environments’ involving all the publics and ‘non-publics in a more innovative and immersive way, and new communication strategies can include and respond to the various visitors’ needs without the necessity of ‘label’ them. The combination of different communication devices can help transform the experience in museums, and create connections between people and cultural heritage, enhancing them at an emotional level. Since technologies are constantly and quickly evolving, the contribution presented will require continuous updates and further developments.
Keywords:
References
Alonzo, E, Di Blas, N., & Paolini, P. (2005). ICT per i beni culturali. esempi di applicazione, in «Mondo Digitale», n.3.
Alu, A., Longo, A. (2018). Cos’é il digital divide, nuova discriminazione sociale (e culturale), in «Agenda Digitale».
Antinucci, F. (2014). Comunicare nel museo, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Benente, M., Minucciani,V., (2020), Inclusive Museums: From Physical Accessibility to Cultural Appropriation. In Di Bucchianico, G. et al. (Eds): AHFE 2020, AISC 1202 (pp. 189-195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51194-4_25
Bonacini, E. (2011). Nuove tecnologie per la fruizione e valorizzazione del patrimonio culturale, Roma: Aracne Editrice.
Commissione Tecnologie Digitali di ICOM Italia, a cura di (2020). Digitale e Tecnologie. Glossario.
Council of Europe, (2005). Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. https://rm.coe.int/1680083746
Dal Pozzo, C., Negri, F., & Novaga, A. (2018). La realta virtuale. Dispositivi, estetiche, immagini. Milano: Mimesis.
Direzione Generale Musei, (2019). Piano Triennale per la Digitalizzaziione e l’Innovazione dei Musei.
ICOMOS, (2008). Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. http://icip.icomos.org/downloads/ICOMOS_Interpretation_Charter_ENG_04_10_08.pdf
Izzo F. (2017). Musei e tecnologie: valorizzare il passato per costruire ilfuturo, Padova: CEDAM.
La Veglia, E. (2019). Digitalizzare reperti e beni culturali. Parola a Mnemosyne 3D. https://www.artribune.com/progettazione/new-media/2019/02/intervista-mnemosyne-3d/
Luigini, A., & Panciroli, C., a cura di (2018). Ambienti digitali per l’educazione all’arte e al patrimonio. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Mandarano, N., a cura di, (2017). Comunicare il museo oggi: dalle scelte museologiche al digitale, Roma: Skira.
Martini, B. (2016). Il Museo Sensibile. Le tecnologie ICT al servizio della trasmissione della conoscenza. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Palombini, A. (2012). Narrazione e virtualita: possibili prospettive per la comunicazione museale, in «DigItalia», anno VII, n.1.
Pacetti, E., (2018) Ambienti digitali nella prima infanzia per giocare con l’arte, in Luigini, A., Panciroli,C., Ambienti digitali per l’educazione all’arte e a1 patrimonio. (190-203): Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Testino, A. (2015). La Russia a colori. A Venezia, tra alfabeti simbolici e luminosi. https://www.artribune.com/report/2015/04/la-russia-a-colori-a-venezia-tra-alfabeti-simbolici-e-luminosi/
United Nations, (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, (2015). Recommendation concerning the Protection and Promotion of Museums and Collections.
Vaudetti, M., Minucciani, V., & Canepa S. a cura di (2013). Mostrare l’archeologia. Per an manuale-atlante degli interventi di valorizzazione. Torino-Londra-New York: Allemandi & C.
Article Details
Abstract views: 246
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
