Built Heritage Meets Inclusive Design
Identifying Challenges And Strategies Through A Multiple Case Study Enquiry
Lene Van de Bemdt
hallo@lenevandebemdt.beDG | architecten (Belgium)
Ann Heylighen
KU Leuven, Department of Architecture, Research Design (Belgium)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6811-3464
Negin Eisazadeh
Université de Liège, Faculté d’Architecture, Art, Archaeology and Heritage Research Unit (UR-AAP); DIVA (Belgium)
Abstract
Inclusive design aims to accommodate as many people as possible by considering the diversity of human abilities and conditions during design. This raises challenges in relation to built heritage: proposals to make a building more inclusive may encounter objections from conservation authorities. Our research aims to (1) explore these tensions between the conservation of built heritage and the ambition to make the built environment more inclusive and (2) identify strategies that allow addressing them.
Based on existing research, we first examined how the domains of inclusive design and built heritage conservation are related, where they conflict and strengthen each other, as well as how researchers with different backgrounds suggest to address them.
Second, we studied six building projects where built heritage and inclusive design meet, all located in Flanders. Due to the coronavirus pandemic, we relied mainly on desk research. We identified challenges, tensions and issues that came forward in the development of these projects as well as strategies adopted to address them.
Two case studies illustrate how built heritage can be an asset to provide high-quality care. The four remaining cases illustrate how KU Leuven university deals with the challenge of rendering its rich historic building patrimony more inclusive.
Confronting the six cases makes clear that built heritage can be made more inclusive, and might even contribute to inclusive design, and that this involves a time consuming process with transdisciplinary input.
Keywords:
built heritage, conservation, inclusive designReferences
Adviesraad toegankelijkheid. (2019, September 12). Stad Leuven. https://www.leuven.be/adviesraad-toegankelijkheid.
Google Scholar
Boie G., Vandamme F. (2015, March 1). De toekomst is aan het zorgerfgoed? Psyche 27(1), (pp. 20–21).
Google Scholar
Boie G., Vandamme F. (2016, August 1). Relationele architectuur. A+261 [Re]politicize, (pp. 51–55).
Google Scholar
Foster L. (1997). Access to the historic environment: Meeting the needs of disabled people. Donhead.Fysieke Toegankelijkheid. (2019, November 8). KU Leuven, Diversiteitsbeleid. https://www.kuleuven.be/diversiteit/fysieke-toegankelijkheid.
Google Scholar
Geschiedenis. (2018, June 22). KU Leuven bibliotheken. https://bib.kuleuven.be/2bergen/cba/over/geschiedenis.
Google Scholar
Heylighen A. (2012). Inclusive Built Heritage as a Matter of Concern: A Field Experiment, [in:] P. Langdon, P. J. Clarkson, P. Robinson, J. Lazar, A. Heylighen (Eds.), Designing Inclusive Systems (pp. 207–216). Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar
Heylighen A., Van der Linden V., Van Steenwinkel I. (2017). Ten questions concerning inclusive design of the built environment. Building and Environment 114, (pp. 507–517). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.008.
Google Scholar
KU Leuven, Directie Technische Diensten. (2017). Beheersplan: Complex omvattende het zwartzusterklooster. KU Leuven.
Google Scholar
Neyt E. (2008). Erfgoed voor Iedereen.KU Leuven.
Google Scholar
Nilsen Ask L. (2015). Access to Cultural Heritage Sites for All. EXARC Journal, 4.
Google Scholar
Ostroff E. (1997). Mining Our Natural Resources: The User as Expert. INNOVATION 16(1).
Google Scholar
Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering tot vaststelling van een gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige verordening betreffende toegankelijkheid, (2009). https://www.toegankelijkgebouw.be/Regelgeving/Integraletekst/tabid/72/Default.aspx.
Google Scholar
Van den Bossche H. (2012). Onroerend erfgoed en toegankelijkheid. Streven naar een betere toegankelijkheid in het kader van de algemene ontsluiting van publiek toegankelijk onroerend erfgoed (Vol. 3). Vlaams Instituut voor het Onroerend Erfgoed. https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/publicaties/VIOH/3/VIOH003-001.pdf.
Google Scholar
Van der Linden V., Van Steenwinkel I., Dong H., Heylighen A. (2016). Designing “little worlds” in Walnut Park: How architects adopted an ethnographic case study on living with dementia, [in:] P. Lloyd, D. Bohemia (Eds.), Proceedings of DRS2016: Design + Research + Society—Future-Focused Thinking 8, (pp. 3199–3212). https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.418.
Google Scholar
Van Steenwinkel I., Van Audenhove C., Heylighen A. (2014). Mary’s Little Worlds: Changing Person–Space Relationships When Living With Dementia. Qualitative Health Research 24(8), (pp. 1023–1032). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314542808.
Google Scholar
Authors
Ann HeylighenKU Leuven, Department of Architecture, Research Design Belgium
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6811-3464
Authors
Negin EisazadehUniversité de Liège, Faculté d’Architecture, Art, Archaeology and Heritage Research Unit (UR-AAP); DIVA Belgium
Statistics
Abstract views: 35PDF downloads: 18
