World Heritage at 50: policy and practice – key achievements and major challenges
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 17 (2023)
-
35 years of World Heritage in the UK – challenges and opportunities
Chris Blandford1-16
-
34 years and counting: the so far experience of World Heritage assets in Thessaloniki, Greece
Dimitrios Zygomalas17-33
-
UNESCO World Heritage Convention – mission and commitment in times of challenges: lessons learnt from World Heritage Cities in Northwest-Europe and North-America
Matthias Ripp, Elena Arndt, Monika Göttler35-53
-
The 50 years of the World Heritage Convention in Spain: implementation, effects, and challenges
Mónica Luengo, Celia Martínez, Xavier Casanovas, Maider Maraña, Jordi Tresserras, Cristina Lafuente55-65
-
Introduction of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention at institutional level and on legal terms. The Hungarian example
Melinda Harlov-Csortán67-82
-
World Heritage at 50: policy and practice – key achievements and major challenges
Mechtild Rössler83-95
-
Changing the game: the case of cultural landscapes
David Jacques97-104
-
World Heritage as a balancing act: experiences from a medium-sized World Heritage City in Bavaria
Patricia Alberth105-114
-
Committee decisions impact on the World Heritage List: breaking the balance
Iva Zunjic115-128
-
Application of experience gleaned from the WHL system in national heritage protection systems – opportunities and benefits
Bogusław Szmygin129-136
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The 1972 World Heritage Convention is the most universal legal instrument in heritage conservation with 194 States Parties, more than 1000 natural and cultural heritage sites protected for their Outstanding Universal Value and a well-established system of monitoring and reporting. It is therefore a great pleasure for me to celebrate the achievements of this unique Convention with stakeholders.
At the same time a number of challenges in terms of policy and practice have to be discussed and addressed and I will share with you my reflections of 30 years working within the World Heritage system. This is also unique and brings to you a specific lens through the viewpoint from the UNESCO Secretariat but also as researcher on the UNESCO and World Heritage history of the past decades.
Keywords:
References
Bertacchini E., Liuzza C., Meskell L., Saccone D., The politicization of UNESCO World Heritage decision making The politicization of UNESCO World Heritage decision making. Public Choice, 2016, pp. 95–129, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0332-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0332-9
Cameron Ch., Rössler M., Many Voices, One Vision: The Early Years of the World Heritage Convention, Farnham: Ashgate/Routledge, 2013.
Day J. C., Heron S. F., Markham A., Assessing the Climate Vulnerability of the World’s Natural and Cultural Heritage, Parks Stewardship Forum 36, no. 1, 2020, pp. 144-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/P536146384
Rössler M., Hosagrahar J., Le programme des villes du patrimoine mondial de l’UNESCO. In : Mémoires urbaines. Coopérer pour protéger. Cahiers de l’Institut Paris Région, numéro 180, Paris 2022, pp. 94-99. https://www.institutparisregion.fr/fileadmin/NewEtudes/000pack3/Etude_2813/C180_web.pdf
Larsen P. B., Logan W. (eds.), World Heritage and Sustainable Development: New Directions in World Heritage Management, Abingdon/New York 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108049
Rössler M., World Heritage and reconstruction: An overview and Lessons Learn from the Bamiyan Valley, [in:] The Future of the Bamiyan Buddha Statues. Heritage reconstruction in Theory and Practice, M. Nagaoka (ed), UNESCO Springer, Cham 2020, pp. 99-111, https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030513153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51316-0_6
Markham A., Osipova E., Lafrenz Samuels K., Caldas A., World Heritage and Tourism in a Changing Climate, Nairobi and Paris 2016.
Meskell L., A Future in Ruins: UNESCO, World Heritage, and the Dream of Peace, New York 2018.
Odiaua I.,Ndoro W., World Heritage and development: is UNESCO a barrier or facilitator and do African opinions matter?, [in:] Cultural Heritage Management in Africa, The Heritage of the Colonized, G. Okello Abungu, W. Ndoro (eds), 2022, pp. 173 -188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003199144-12
Von Schorlemer S., UNESCO-Weltkulturerbe und postkoloniale Diskurse. Eine völkerrechtliche Betrachtung, Baden Baden 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748906032
Ringbeck B.,Rössler M., Between international obligations and local politics: the case of the Dresden Elbe Valley under the 1972 World Heritage Convention, [in:] Denkmalschutz and Stadtentwicklung. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 3/4, 2011, pp. 205-211.
Warsaw Recommendation on Recovery and Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage, [in:] The Challenges of World Heritage Recovery, M. Marcinkowska K. Zalasinska (eds), pp. 327-35. Warsaw 2019.
UNESCO, The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, 2021 https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/
Article Details
Abstract views: 155
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
