Reconstruction of destroyed architectural monuments in Ukraine: Between historical authenticity and modern needs of the urban environment
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 22 (2024)
-
Reconstruction of destroyed architectural monuments in Ukraine:
Between historical authenticity and modern needs of the urban environmentOlesya Chagovets, Olena Zhukova1-32 -
Heritage Authenticity as a Source of Personal and Collective Identity
Jelka Pirkovič33-47
-
The ‘open’ Venice Charter
Learning from the Multiple Interpretations and Translations of the Charter’s Article 9Claudine Houbart, Stéphane Dawans49-60 -
Reflecting on the Venice Charter: Constructing an Accessible Environment for the Preservation of Taiwan’s Cultural Heritage
Chih-Yuan Chang61-75
-
Authenticity: A very Greek word in a complex European setting
Dimitrios Zygomalas77-92
-
The heritage of light and shade in Cairo
The missing principle for conservation in Islamic historic citiesHossam Mahdy93-108 -
Built Heritage Meets Inclusive Design
Identifying Challenges And Strategies Through A Multiple Case Study EnquiryLene Van de Bemdt, Ann Heylighen, Negin Eisazadeh109-127
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
In the context of the 60th anniversary of the Venice Charter, this report focuses on the challenges and opportunities for the reconstruction of destroyed monuments in Ukraine that go beyond traditional methods of restoration and conservation.
The circumstances of extensive cultural heritage destruction due to hostilities in Ukraine have presented us with a crucial decision: how to preserve the historical identity and cultural memory of the nation? An example of this can be a city like Kharkiv, where the conservation of ruins or the creation of memorial sites proves to be impossible.
This report analyses the challenges associated with the replication of monuments in the urban context of Ukraine, with a particular focus on ensuring the preservation of the urban environment and historical identity.
Recognizing the loss of historic buildings as a threat, this report emphasizes the necessity of finding flexible solutions. Special attention is dedicated to preserving the authenticity of the destroyed objects while ensuring their adaptation to new functional needs and the demands of modern usage. Considering the uniqueness of each site, various approaches are explored, ranging from precise reconstruction to more interpretive methods that maintain the historical essence of the place while introducing new functional elements.
The report outlines discussions on the moral and practical aspects of reconstructing destroyed objects, addressing the role of the Venice Charter in Ukraine today. It suggests updating doctrinal documents to tackle current urban challenges. The paper highlights the significance of ruined monuments for cities' historical and cultural identities, exemplifying cultural heritage preservation during wartime.
Keywords:
References
Artishevskyi, A. (2007). Some aspects of the preservation and use of ancient monuments. Modern problems of research, restoration and preservation of cultural heritage, (4), 392-396 [In Ukrainian].
Bortnikova, A. (2013). The phenomenon of "Genius loci" in the natural and cultural landscape of a small homeland. Scientific Notes of the National University of Ostroh Academy, Series: 189 Philosophy, (13), 9-13 [In Ukrainian].
Bozhenko, A. & Chahovets, O. (2023). Identifying the value of Stalinist architecture in the context of decommunisation processes. Cultural heritage of Slobozhanshchyna. № 52. С. 98-107.
Bulavin, M. (2019). Only Photos Remain: Seven Lost Temples of Kharkiv. Mykharkov.info [online], June 18, 2019. [Accessed January 05, 2024]. Available at: https://mykharkov.info/interesno/ratings /ostalis-tolko-fotografii-sem-utrachennyh-hramov-harkova-29426.html [In Russian].
Butsenko, O. (2020). Issues of culture and cultural heritage in the projection of sustainable development goals. Art Research of Ukraine, (20), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.31500/ 2309-8155.20.2020.220912 [In Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31500/2309-8155.20.2020.220912
Cherkasova, E. (2007). Forms of adaptation of architectural monuments to modern use. Scientific Bulletin of Construction; Collection of scientific papers, (41), 22-30. [In Russian].
Davidich, Т. (2013). Styles in the Architecture of Kharkiv. Kharkiv: Litera Nova, 164 p. [In Ukrainian].
Davydova, Y., & Hovyna, L. (2024, 14 January). More than 200 monuments destroyed in Kharkiv region due to the war: What violations do architects see when treating buildings? Suspilne news. [online]. [Accessed March 08, 2024]. Available at: https://suspilne.media/653632-na-harkivsini -cerez-vijnu-zrujnovani-ponad-200-pamatok-aki-porusenna-bacat-arhitektori-pid-cas-povodzenna-z-budivlami/ [In Ukrainian].
Dezhkina, M. (2021, 16 January). Kharkiv is suing the owner of an architectural monument who changed its appearance. Suspilne news. [online]. [Accessed March 08, 2024]. Available at: https://suspilne.media/96075-u-harkovi-sudatsa-z-vlasnikom-pamatki-arhitekturi-akij-zminiv-ii-viglad [In Ukrainian].
Destruction of monument protection. (n.d.). [online]. [Accessed March 08, 2024]. Available at: http://kyiv-heritage.com/page/znischennya-okhoroni-pamyatok [In Ukrainian].
Destroyed history. How the Russians are destroying Kharkiv's monuments. (2022, 22 July). KharkivToday. [online]. [Accessed March 08, 2024]. Available at: https://2day.kh.ua/ua/kharkow/ znyshchena-istoriya-yak-rosiyany-ruynuyut-pamyatky-kharkova [In Ukrainian].
Diss, J. (2022, 2 November). [Response to the concept of rethinking the building of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration from Dmitry Kuznetsov] [Attached image] [Post]. [Accessed March 08, 2024]. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/elevinshteyn/posts/pfbid02WU55foHgkN8Kr6zd 4vJWaNhbsGWcQBa56VqAn1dWrx6W31r9T6nohsLMdLudMjRdl [In Ukrainian].
Goncharova, K. (2014). The Place of the Venice Charter Principles in the Context of National Cultural Revival in Ukraine after 1991. Change Over Time, 4(2):286-307. doi: 10.1353/COT.2014.0027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cot.2014.0027
E-pamiatka. (n.d.). Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of Ukraine. [online]. [Accessed March 08, 2024]. Available at: https://e-pamiatka.gov.ua/ [In Ukrainian].
Fitzpatrick, S. (1995). The cultural front: Power and culture in revolutionary russia. Slavic Review, 54(2), 475–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/2501665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2501665
Kara-Vasylieva, T. (2022). Cultural heritage of Ukraine: Research, its state in the period of the newest challenges of modernity. Visn. Nac. Acad. Nauk Ukr., (7), 42–46. [In Ukrainian].
Kharkiv Regional Prosecutor's Office, (n.d.). [online], [Accessed January 8, 2024]. Available at: https://khar.gp.gov.ua/ [In Ukrainian].
Kharkiv, which attracts. (n.d.). [online]. [Accessed March 17, 2024]. Available at: https://moniacs.kh.ua/ [In Ukrainian].
KhODA building: demolish or leave? (2023, 16 March). (n.d.), art-oborona.weblium.site. [Accessed March 13, 2024]. Available at: https://art-oborona.weblium.site/khoada-discussion
Kot, S. (Ed.) (2015). Cultural heritage in the context of the "Syllabus of historical and cultural monuments of Ukraine". Institute of History of Ukraine, p. 486 [in Ukrainian].
Kupriychuk, V. (2018). The role of national cultural heritage in the formation of Ukrainian identity. Formation of Ukrainian identity in the context of modern challenges: Theoretical and political aspects: Monograph, edited by V. Troshchynskyi, Kyiv, 78-106. [In Ukrainian].
Leshchenko, N. (2022). The principle of "integrity" in the complex process of restoration and reconstruction transformations of historical city centres. Modern Problems of Architecture and Urban Planning, (62), 50-60. [In Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2022.62.50-60
Ligostaeva, S. (2020, 28 October). Architectural catastrophe in the centre of Kharkiv. UKRINFORM. [online]. [Accessed March 17, 2024]. Available at: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-regions/ 3124268-arhitekturna-katastrofa-v-centri-harkova.html. [In Ukrainian].
López Morales, F. J. (2016). La Carta de Venecia en el siglo xxi. Gremium, 3(5), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.56039/rgn05a04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56039/rgn05a04
Main Directorate of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine in Kharkiv Region. (n.d.) [online]. [Accessed March 17, 2024]. Available at: https://kh.dsns.gov.ua/ [In Ukrainian].
Map of destroyed architectural monuments in Kharkiv. (n.d). [online]. [Accessed March 17, 2024]. Available at: https://hero.kharkiv.ua/ [In Ukrainian].
Map of destruction and recovery. (n.d.). [online]. [Accessed March 17, 2024]. Available at: https://reukraine.shtab.net/ [In Ukrainian].
Meshcheryakov, V. (2016). Mechanisms of state regulation in the field of protection of historical and cultural heritage and architectural monuments in the regions. [PhD thesis in public administration.] [In Ukrainian].
MCIP: 872 monuments of cultural heritage were damaged due to Russian aggression in Ukraine. (2024, 9 January). Unified web portal of the executive authorities of Ukraine. [online]. [Accessed March 08, 2024]. Available at: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/mkip-cherez-rosiisku-ahresiiu-v-ukraini-postrazhdaly-872-pamiatky-kulturnoi-spadshchyny [In Ukrainian].
Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of Ukraine. (n.d.). [online]. [Accessed March 17, 2024]. Available at: https://mcip.gov.ua/ [In Ukrainian].
Movchan, O. (2007). Campaign to confiscate church values in the Ukrainian SSR in 1922, Encyclopedia of the History of Ukraine: in 10 volumes / Vol. 4, Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, P. 50. [In Ukrainian].
Nakypilo LIVE. (2024, 2 February). Discussion of the problems of restoring architectural monuments damaged by Russian aggression [Video]. YouTube. [Accessed 08 March, 2024]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prxJ5gtRhC0 [In Ukrainian].
NeMo: Ukrainian Heritage Monitoring Lab. (n.d). Monitoring heritage for restoration. [online]. [Accessed March 10, 2024] Available at: https://www.heritage.in.ua/
Oleynik, A. (2020). Kharkiv may lose the Mussouri Circus. [online]. [Accessed March 10, 2024] Available at: https://kharkiv.znaj.ua/327754-u-harkovi-legendarniy-cirk-mussuri-peretvoryuyetsya -na-rujinu-yogo-obozhnyuvali-shalyapin-visockiy-i-charivna-dunkan [In Ukrainian].
Orlenko, M. (2016a). Legislative policy in the field of protection and restoration of architectural monuments. Regional policy: Historical origins, legislative regulation, practical implementation: Collection of scientific papers, 2(II), 7-11. [In Ukrainian].
Osychenko, H. (2022). Modern trends in the restoration of architectural monuments. Urban Planning and Territorial Planning, (79), 283-295. [In Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2022.79.283-295
Panasiuk, S. (2022, 4 November). The new building of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration: what did the author of the concept want to say and how did social media react? "Luke" - online media about Kharkiv. [online]. [Accessed March 10, 2024] Available at: https://lyuk.media/city/kharkivoda-new-concept/ [In Ukrainian].
Plamenytska, O. (1997). Ukrainian restoration: Problems and prospects of development. Monuments of Ukraine: History and Culture, (1), 15-18. [In Ukrainian].
Plamenytska, O. (2004). The Venice Charter: A view from the distance of 40 years. Monuments of Ukraine: History and Culture, (4), 60-63. [In Ukrainian].
Plamenytska, O. (2013). The case of the "subject of protection" of an architectural monument as a methodological problem. Ukrainian Academy of Arts, (21), 133-146. [In Ukrainian].
Potapenko, V., Tyshchenko, Y., Kaplan, Y., Bakalchuk, V., Lytvynenko, O., & Mykhailova, O. (2023). Cultural heritage and national security. National Institute for Strategic Studies. https://doi.org/10.53679/niss-analytrep.2023.08 [In Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53679/NISS-analytrep.2023.08
Project "Visual Identification of Heritage: Virtual presentation of public spaces in historic cities of Ukraine"(2023). [online]. [Accessed March 10, 2024] https://heritage-research.com.ua/golovna-storinka-proekt
Prybega, L. (2022). The Concept of Authenticity in Architectural Monument Studies and Restoration. Ukrainian Academy of Arts, (31), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.33838/naoma.31.2022.7-14 [In Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33838/naoma.31.2022.7-14
Riazantseva, A. and Hrebinnyk, D. (2022). A Century-Old Building in Kharkiv Damaged by shelling: An Architect Explains How to Preserve It. Suspilne News. [online]. November 10, 2022. [Accessed January 17, 2024]. Available at: https://suspilne.media/313724-poskodzena-obstrilami-storicna-budivla-u-harkovi-arhitektor-rozpoviv-ak-ii-vberegti/ [In Ukrainian].
Rishniak, O. (2022). Cultural heritage in a military conflict: International experience of the second half of the twentieth - the beginning of the twenty-first centuries and the ukrainian present time. Ukraïnsʹkij ìstoričnij žurnal, (4), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2022.04.159 [In Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2022.04.159
Rybchynskyi, O. (2015). Analysis of programmes for the preservation of cultural heritage of Ukraine. (The CHOICE project: cultural heritage and modernity”). [In Ukrainian].
Salimonovich, L. (2022, 16 June). Recognition by the facade: How Kharkiv's architectural monuments destroyed by rashists will be reconstructed. Ukraine Moloda. [online]. [Accessed March 10, 2024]. Available at: https://umoloda.kyiv.ua/number/3808/2006/167129/ [In Ukrainian].
Salimonovych, L. (2022, 9 June). To restore or not: a confrontation is brewing in Kharkiv over the fate of the historic building of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration. Ukraina Moloda. [online]. [Accessed March 10, 2024]. Available at: https://umoloda.kyiv.ua/number/3807/196/166965/ [In Ukrainian].
Semyakin, G. (2017). On the definition of the concept of the subject of protection in modern normative sources on the preservation of architectural heritage. Naukovy vysnik buduyvnitstva, 89(3), 58-62. [In Russian].
Smolenska, S. (2015). Preserving the monuments of constructivism in Ukraine (based on unpublished archival materials). Modern problems of architecture and urban planning, Vol. 41: 190–98. [In Ukrainian].
Solodovnyk, M. and Dezhkina, M. (2023). In Kharkiv, a Request to Conserve a 19th Century Monument Damaged by a Russian Missile. Suspilne News. [online]. April 21, 2023. [Accessed January 17, 2024]. Available at: https://suspilne.media/653632-na-harkivsini-cerez-vijnu-zrujnovani-ponad-200-pamatok-aki-porusenna-bacat-arhitektori-pid-cas-povodzenna-z-budivlami/ [In Ukrainian].
State Register of Immovable Monuments of Ukraine. (n.d.). Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of Ukraine. [online]. [Accessed March 10, 2024]. Available at: https://mcip.gov.ua/kulturna-spadshchyna/derzhavnyy-reiestr-nerukhomykh-pam-iatok-ukrainy/ [In Ukrainian].
Vecherskyi, V. (2002). Lost objects of the architectural heritage of Ukraine. Research Institute of the Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning; Main Department of Urban Planning and What is happening around the "official" reconstruction of Kharkiv. (2023, 16 August). Kharkiv Anti-Corruption Centre. [online]. [Accessed March 10, 2024]. Available at: https://anticor-kharkiv.org/our-work/pro-te-shcho-foster-u-pryntsypi-ne-mozhe-rozrobyty-henplan-my-znaly-vid-pochatku-shcho-vidbuvaietsia-navkolo-ofitsiynoi-vidbudovy-kharkova-ta-khto-shche-pratsiuie-nad-kontseptsiieiu-vidnovlennia-mis/ [In Ukrainian].
Yacyna, О., & H. Mykhailov. (2021). The First Kharkiv Fortress. Kharkiv: The House of Advertising, 95.
Article Details
Abstract views: 376

