The relevance of the Venice Charter today
Stefano Gizzi
gizzi.stefano.arch@gmail.comIcomos Italia (Italy)
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3713-4318
Abstract
The intention of the research is to verify how current the Venice Charter is and how valid it still is today. The main field of criticism was that the Charter was an expression of a Eurocentric mentality or a Western-only vision. But, bearing in mind all the signatories of that document, we instead see how it was the fruit of varied experiences and expressions from various parts of the world.
Keywords:
Venice Charter, Eurocentrism, universal validityReferences
Bengolea del Carpio J.L. (2015). Víctor Pimentel Gurmendi y el patrimonio monumental. Textos escogidos. Lima: Editorial Universitaria.
Google Scholar
Correa Orbegoso J. (1978). De la arqueología a la obra contemporánea. Oiga, 32, Septiembre 1978 (pp. 16-18).
Google Scholar
Correa Orbegoso J., Hayakawa Casas C. (2011). La formación en Restauración de Monumentos Arquitectónicos en la Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería. Ciudad & Arquitectura 4 (2).
Google Scholar
Daifuku H. (1967). Report of mission to the US and to the México. Mission Report. Unesco.
Google Scholar
Daifuku H. (1983). Conservation of wooden cultural property Tokio and Saitama [in:] International Symposium on the conservation and restoration of cultural property, 1-6 November 1982. Tokio.
Google Scholar
Di Stefano R. (1981). For a New Edition of the Venice Charter. ICOMOS. Napoli: Arte Tipografica di A.R.
Google Scholar
Flores Marini C. (1971). The “Plaza de las tres Culturas” [in:] Il Monumento per l’Uomo, Atti del II Congresso Internazionale del Restauro, Venezia 25-31 maggio 1964 (pp. 914-916). Padova: Marsilio.
Google Scholar
Flores Marini C. (2005). Souvenir de la Charte de Venise, [in:] E. Kovács (Ed.). The Venice Charter: 1964-2004-2044? The fortieth anniversary (Hungary, May 22-27, 2004) (pp. 27-39). Hungarian National Committee of ICOMOS.
Google Scholar
Kovács E. (2005). The Venice Charter. La Charte de Venice 1964-2004-2044? The fortieth Anniversary. Hungarian National Committee of ICOMOS.
Google Scholar
Mairesse F., Peters R. F. (2019). What is the Essence of Conservation: Materials for a Discussion. Papers from the Icom-Cc and Icofom Session at the 25th General Conference held in Kyoto, 4 September 2019. Paris: ICOFOM.
Google Scholar
Peters J.A. (1996). The Burra Charter at Work in Australia. CRM Bulletin (19,3) (pp. 49-51).
Google Scholar
Pietrangeli C. (1989). Membri dell’Istituto scamparsi: Deoclecio Redig de Campos. Studi Romani. Rivista trimestrale dell’Istituto di Studi Romani (37, 3) (pp. 344-346).
Google Scholar
Pimentel Gurmendi V. (1966). La restauración de monumentos en el Peru, in Patrimonio Cultural, Cultural Property, 1, Preservación de Monumentos, Preservation of Monuments. Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar
Pimentel Gurmendi V. (1973). Regeneración urbana y patrimonio monumental. Boletín del Centro de Investigaciones Históricas y Estéticas (pp. 91-97). Caracas.
Google Scholar
Rivera Marín de Coronel R. (1971). The protection of the artistic and cultural patrimony in México [in:] Il Monumento per l’Uomo, Atti del II Congresso Internazionale del Restauro, Venezia 25-31 maggio 1964 (pp. 667-668). Padova: Marsilio.
Google Scholar
Icomos Italia
Google Scholar
Instituto de Investigaciones Esteticas de México
Google Scholar
Iccrom Library
Google Scholar
Authors
Stefano Gizzigizzi.stefano.arch@gmail.com
Icomos Italia Italy
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3713-4318
Statistics
Abstract views: 14PDF downloads: 45