The ‘open’ Venice Charter
Learning from the Multiple Interpretations and Translations of the Charter’s Article 9
Claudine Houbart
c.houbart@uliege.beUniversity of Liège (Belgium), Faculty of Architecture (Belgium)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-5815
Stéphane Dawans
University of Liège (Belgium), Faculty of Architecture (Belgium)
Abstract
This paper contributes to a research initiative aimed at addressing a significant gap in the historiography of the Venice Charter: its translations. Originally composed in French, the charter underwent subsequent translations into English, Spanish, and Russian shortly after its inception, with the French and English versions serving as the basis for subsequent translations. However, a cursory examination of these versions reveals notable disparities, indicating a departure from Umberto Eco’s notion of translations ‘saying almost the same thing’. These linguistic variations gave rise to diverse interpretations over time and across geographical regions, suggesting that the Venice Charter operated more as an ‘open work’ than a rigidly universal standard. While refraining from direct engagement with the charter’s contemporary relevance, this article delves into the potential significance of examining translations and interpretations, focusing on one of its most contentious sections: Article 9 and, particularly, the concepts of ‘distinctiveness’ and ‘contemporary stamp’. These reflections are contextualized through Umberto Eco‘s insights on the nature of the ‘open work’ and the intricacies of the translation process.
Keywords:
Venice Charter, universalism, translation, open workReferences
Brandi, C. (2005). Theory of Restoration, edited by Giuseppe Basile, translated by Cynthia Rockwell. Rome: Istituto Centrale per il Restauro, Nardini editore.
Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1966). Structure du langage poétique. Paris : Flammarion.
Google Scholar
Eco, U. (2003). Dire presque la même chose. Paris : Grasset, 2003.
Google Scholar
Groupe µ (1977). Rhétorique de la poésie: Lecture linéaire, lecture tabulaire. Brussels : Éditions complexe.
Google Scholar
His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales (2009). Foreword. In: The Venice Charter Revisited: Modernism, Conservation and Tradition in the 21st Century (xiii-xiv). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Google Scholar
Houbart, C. (2014). Deconsecrating a doctrinal monument: Raymond M. Lemaire (1921-1997) and the Revisions of the Venice Charter. Change Over Time, 4(2), 218-243.
Google Scholar
Houbart C. (2018) The Great Beguinage of Leuven: An Early Challenge for the Venice Charter. Opus, Nuova serie (2), 105-128.
Google Scholar
Houbart, C. (2024), The Evolution of Urban Heritage Conservation and the Role of Raymond Lemaire. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
ICOMOS (1965). International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Charter, 1964).
Google Scholar
ICOMOS (1978). Summary Report of the Vth General Assembly of ICOMOS, Moscou-Souzdal, 22–24 May 1978. Available at: https://www.icomos.org/public/publications/1978-Moscou.pdf.
Google Scholar
ICOMOS (1989). Charta von Venedig neu übersetzt. Denkmalschutz Informationen, XIII(3), 2‑6.
Google Scholar
Iser W. (1978). The Act of Reading: a Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics. In: Style in Language (350-377): Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Google Scholar
Jencks, C. (1988). The Prince, The Architects and New Wave Monarchy. New York: Rizzoli.
Google Scholar
Kovács, E. (2005). The Venice Charter 1964—2004—2044? : The fortieth anniversary, Budapest-Pécs, Hungary, May 22-27, 2004. Hungarian National Committee of ICOMOS.
Google Scholar
Lagneau, J.-F., dir. (2019). Retour à l’esprit de la Charte de Venise. Paris : ICOMOS France.
Google Scholar
Lemaire, R. M. (1976). La mémoire et la continuité. Louvain, Archive of the R.M. Lemaire International Centre for Conservation.
Google Scholar
Lemaire, R. M. (1995). Faut-il revoir la Charte de Venise. Restauro, La Carta di Venezia trenta anni dopo: incontro internazionale di studio, 24 (131-132), 5-9.
Google Scholar
Lyons, D. (1999). Open Texture and the Possibility of Legal Interpretation. Law and Philosophy, 18(3), 297-309.
Google Scholar
Parent, M. (1976). Problèmes de la restauration avec l’environnement sociologique et culturel. Les monuments historiques de la France, hors-série, ‘Les restaurations françaises et la Charte de Venise’, 10-19.
Google Scholar
Peterson, C. E. (1965). The monumental patrimony. American Institute of Architects Journal 43(1), 57-59.
Google Scholar
Riffaterre, M. (1978). Semiotics of poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Google Scholar
Rodwell, D. (2022). Inhabited Historic Cities, Urban Heritage, and dissonances at the heart of the World Heritage system. European journal of postclassical archaeologies, 12, 291 352.
Google Scholar
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Szmygin, B., & Skoczylas, O. (2021). Factors shaping the Venice Charter and its usefulness – on the example of heritage protection in Poland. Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych, 17(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.2861
Google Scholar
Tomaszewski, A. (2005). Intellectual context of monuments and sites in their setting. In: 15th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium: ‘Monuments and sites in their setting - conserving cultural heritage in changing townscapes and landscapes’, 17 – 21 oct 2005, Xi'an, China. Available at: https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/300/
Google Scholar
Wells, J.C. (2007). The plurality of truth in culture, context, and heritage: a (mostly) post-structuralist analysis of urban conservation charters. City & Time, 3(2).
Google Scholar
Wells, J.C. (2019). The Treatment of Historic Automobiles and Buildings. In: The Routledge Companion to Automobile Heritage, Culture, and Preservation (35-46). Routledge Handbooks Online.
Google Scholar
Authors
Claudine Houbartc.houbart@uliege.be
University of Liège (Belgium), Faculty of Architecture Belgium
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-5815
Authors
Stéphane DawansUniversity of Liège (Belgium), Faculty of Architecture Belgium
Statistics
Abstract views: 33PDF downloads: 14