Relationships between Wellbeing and Sustainable Development in a Group of Selected Developed Countries

Magdaléna Drastichová


Technical University of Ostrava, Czechia (Czechia)

Peter Filzmoser


TU Wien, Austria (Austria)

Rastko Gajanin


TU Wien, Austria (Austria)

Abstract

This work evaluates the crucial aspects of sustainable development (SD) related to wellbeing and quality of life, which were measured by twenty-two relevant indicators (indices) in a sample of 31 countries over the period 2010 – 2019. All the pillars of SD are reflected, while the indicators applied either reflect one of these dimensions, i.e. the economic, social or environmental pillar of SD, or two/all of them. Several of these indicators also measure specific aspects encompassed by the particular pillars, which are of great importance for SD and have to be included. These include especially health and inequality, which belong to the social pillar of SD, and are reflected in several indicators used. Furthermore, the indicator of subjective happiness is included as well. Principal component analysis (PCA) and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) are the main methods used to analyse relationships between twenty-two indicators (composite indices) reflecting crucial aspects of SD, wellbeing, and quality of life in the sample. Three stages of both analyses were carried out. For both of them similar results were identified. Principal component 1 (for PCA)/component 1 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample into the less and the more developed countries, since the positive contribution was predominantly determined by the socioeconomic, wellbeing and the more complex environmental or SD indicators, which are predominantly the highest (high) in the more developed countries. On the contrary, the negative contribution was determined by the pollution damage indicators, which are the highest in the less developed countries. Principal component 2 (for PCA)/component 2 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample according to a crucial aspect of the social pillar of SD, i.e. quality of health, particularly reflected in Healthy life years at birth (HLY), which has also poor results in the many developed countries. At the third stage this component is determined by the environmental indicators reflecting resource depletion/consumption and also pollution damages in monetary values, being crucial for SD, since a number of them had the highest values in the developed countries. 


Keywords:

adjusted savings, Inequality-Adjusted HDI (IHDI), Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), sustainable development, wellbeing

ASARA V., OTERO I., DEMARIA F., CORBERA E., 2015, Socially Sustainable Degrowth as a Social-Ecological Transformation, Sustainability Science 10(3): 375-384.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0321-9   Google Scholar

ATKINSON A.B., 1970, On the Measurement of Inequality, Journal of Economic Theory 2(3): 244-263.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6   Google Scholar

BEEKS J.C., 2016, Which of the current diverse ideas on alternative Economics are the best for adequately and Compre-hensively addressing the great Transition to climate, energy and biodiversity Sustainability? California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco, CA.
  Google Scholar

BELING A.E., VANHULST J., DEMARIC F., RABI V., CARBALLO A. E., PELENC J., 2018, Discursive Synergies for a ‘Great Transformation’ Towards Sustainability: Pragmatic Contributions to a Necessary Dialogue Between Human Development, Degrowth, and Buen Vivir, Ecological Economics 144: 304-313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025   Google Scholar

BENKING H., MEHLMANN M., 2017, #30 Visions of Sustainability – 2017, https://www.academia.edu/41755849/_30_Visions_of_Sustainability_2017?email_work_card=title (26.09.2021).
  Google Scholar

DRASTICHOVA M., 2018, The Theory and Measurement of Sustainable Development, SAEI, 52, VSB-TU Ostrava, Ostrava.
  Google Scholar

DRASTICHOVA M., FILZMOSER P., 2019, Assessment of Sustainable Development Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 14(2): 7-24.
  Google Scholar

DRASTICHOVA M., FILZMOSER P., 2021, Factors of Quality of Life in a Group of Selected European Union and OECD Countries, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 16(2): 75-93.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.2.09   Google Scholar

ECG, 2021, The Economy for the Common Good, https://www.ecogood.org/what-is-ecg/theory-behind-ecg/ (14.01.2022).
  Google Scholar

ECKERSLEY R., 2006, Progress, sustainability and human well-being: is a new worldview emerging? International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 1(4):304-317.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2006.013733   Google Scholar

EUROSTAT, 2021, Eurostat Database, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (28.09.2021).
  Google Scholar

FITOUSSJ.P., SEN A. K., STIGLITZ J. E., 2011, Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Add Up, The New Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

FRITZ M., KOCH M., 2016, Economic development and prosperity patterns around the world: Structural challenges for a global steady-state economy, Global Environmental Change 38: 41-48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.007   Google Scholar

GEISENDORF S., PIETRULLA F., 2017, The circular economy and circular economic concepts-a literature analysis and redefinition, Thunderbird International Business Review 60, https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21924.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21924   Google Scholar

GNEGNE Y., 2009, Adjusted Net Saving and Welfare Change, Ecological Economics 68(4): 1127-1139.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.002   Google Scholar

GUOMEI Z., JUN Z., HUAYOU L., JING W., ANDERSON R., LINDHJEM H., VENNEMO H., VICINI G., 2006, International experiences with environmental and economic accounting PRCEE, ECON and FEEM.
  Google Scholar

HELLIWELL J.F., LAYARD R., SACHS J. D., DE NEVE J.-E., AKNIN L., WANG S., 2021, World Happiness Re-port 2021, Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York, https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2021/happiness-trust-and-deaths-under-covid-19/ (14.11.2021).
  Google Scholar

HUSSAIN M., 1994, Human geography, Rawat Publications, Jaipur.
  Google Scholar

IUCN, UNEP & WWF, 1991, Caring for the Earth: a Strategy for Sustainable Living. Gland, Switzerland.
  Google Scholar

JOHNSON R.A., WICHERND.W., 2007, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 6th ed., Pearson Education, United States.
  Google Scholar

KALLIS G., 2011, In Defence of Degrowth, Ecological Economics 70: 873-880.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007   Google Scholar

KOMIYAMA H., TAKEUCHI K., 2016, Sustainability science: building a new discipline, Sustain. Sci. 1: 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4   Google Scholar

KOTHARI A., DEMARIA F., ACOSTA A., 2014, Buen vivir, degrowth and ecological swaraj: alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy, Development 57: 362-375, https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24   Google Scholar

LA NOTTE A., D’AMATO D., MAKINEN H., PARACCHINI M.-L., LIQUETTE C., EGOH B., GENELETTI, D., CROSSMAN N. D., 2017, Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework, Ecological Indicators 74: 392-402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.030.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.030   Google Scholar

LOREK S., SPANGENBERG J.H., 2014, Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy – beyond green growth and green economies, Journal of Cleaner Production 63: 33-44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045   Google Scholar

MAES J., LIQUETE C., TELLER A., ERHARD M., PARACCHINI M. L., BARREDO J. I., GRIZZETTI B., CAR-DOSO A., SOMMA F., PETERSEN J., 2016, An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, Ecosystem services 17: 14-23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023   Google Scholar

MOSTEANU D., MIHAILALICA G., HALMAGHI E.-E., MOSTEANU R., 2014. The Sustainable Development – Human Development, Management and Economics 73: 106-113.
  Google Scholar

MULLER F., BURKHARD B., 2012, The indicator side of ecosystem services, Ecosystem Services 1(1): 26-30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001   Google Scholar

O’NEILL D.W., FANNING A.L., LAMB W.F., STEINBERG J.K., 2018, A good life for all within planetary bounda-ries, Nat. Sustain. 1: 88-95, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4   Google Scholar

RUZZENENTI F., VIVANCO D. F., GALVIN R., SORRELL S., WAGNER A., WALNUM H.J., 2019, The Rebound Effect and the Jevons' Paradox: Beyond the Conventional Wisdom, Frontiers in Energy Research 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00090.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00090   Google Scholar

SCHUMACHER E.F., 2011, Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. Random House, New York.
  Google Scholar

SINHA B., 2019, Multidimensional Approach to Quality of Life Issues. A Spatial Analysis, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6958-2   Google Scholar

SPANGENBERG J.H., 2014, Institutional change for strong sustainable consumption: sustainable consumption and the degrowth economy, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 10(1): 62-77, https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2014.11908125.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2014.11908125   Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), 2011, Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Pro-gress – OECD Indicators, Paris, France.
  Google Scholar

TEEB, 2009, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy makers – summary: responding to the value of nature 2009, TEEB, Geneva, Switzerland.
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS Development Programme (UNDP), 2022, Human Development Reports, New York, USA, http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev (30.01.2022).
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS Development Programme (UNDP), 2015, Human Development Report 2015. Work for Human Development, New York, USA, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_ human_development_report.pdf (13.12.2021).
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS Environment Programme (UNEP), 2011, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, New York, USA.
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, OECD, World Bank, 2003, Handbook of National Accounting. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003, Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 61, Rev. 1 (ST/ESA/STAT/SER.F/61/Rev.1).
  Google Scholar

VAN DEN BERGH J.C.J.M., KALLIS G., 2012, Growth, A-Growth or Degrowth to Stay within Planetary Boundaries?, J. Econ. 46: 909-920.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460404   Google Scholar

WALLACE K.J., 2007, Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions, Biological Conservation 139: 235-246, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015   Google Scholar

WCED, 1987, Our common future, Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York.
  Google Scholar

WIEDMANN T.O., SCHNADL H., LENZEN M., MORAN D., SUH S., WEST J., KANEMOTO K., 2015, The material footprint of nations, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(20): 6271-6, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110   Google Scholar

WORLD BANK, 2021, Data Bank, Adjusted Net Savings, https://databank.banquemondiale.org/source/adjusted-net-savings/preview/on.
  Google Scholar

WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE, 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC, http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2023-07-07

Cited by

Drastichová, M., Filzmoser, P., & Gajanin, R. (2023). Relationships between Wellbeing and Sustainable Development in a Group of Selected Developed Countries . Problemy Ekorozwoju, 18(2), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3941

Authors

Magdaléna Drastichová 

Technical University of Ostrava, Czechia Czechia

Authors

Peter Filzmoser 

TU Wien, Austria Austria

Authors

Rastko Gajanin 

TU Wien, Austria Austria

Statistics

Abstract views: 272
PDF downloads: 266