Relationships between Wellbeing and Sustainable Development in a Group of Selected Developed Countries
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023)
-
The Future of Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development Journal
Artur Pawłowski7-12
-
From the Territory of Recovery to Sustainable Development: a Methodological Concept of Effective Socio-economic Development of Ukraine after the War Development
Nataly Martynovych, Iryna Yemchenko, Tetiana Kulinich13-25
-
The Impact of the War in Ukraine on the Food Security of Low-Income Countries
Olena Shevchuk, Olha Ilyash, Serhii Kozlovskyi, Nadiia Roshchyna, Svitlana Hrynkevych, Vira Butenko, Glib Mazhara26-41
-
Is the Current Reality Conducive to the Implementation of Sustainable Development?
Wiesław Sztumski42-48
-
Relationships between Wellbeing and Sustainable Development in a Group of Selected Developed Countries
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser, Rastko Gajanin49-77
-
Comparison of Japan and OECD Countries in Terms of Well-Being Resources
Fatma Ince78-85
-
Towards a Political Economy of Renewable Energy: Does Democracy and Globalization Matter for Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs)
Orhan Cengiz, Müge Manga86-101
-
The Role of Education and Innovation in Renewable Energy Consumption in OECD and BRICS Countries
Junrong Li, Abid Rehman, Jamal Khan102-110
-
Towards Sustainable Development: Revisiting the Middle-Income Trap Hypothesis for the Southern Common Market Countries
Veli Yilanci, Uğur Ursavaş, Tamer Güven111-120
-
Philosophy of Sustainable Development: Understanding the Significance of Gender Equality in Business Organisations
Purnima Lenka121-127
-
Sustainable Livelihoods a Foundation for Rural Development Leads to Sustainability
Abhijeet Kumar, Avinash Kumar, Swati Kumari, Neha Kumari, Sneha Kumari, Puja Mishra128-140
-
Green Marketing: An Ethical and Anti-Environmental Resilient Approach for Sustainable Business
Sachin Chauhan, Naznin Naznin141-147
-
On the Relationship Between ISO Standards and Sustainable Development
Enriko Ceko148-158
-
Effect of Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Performance in Supply Chain Management
Shuang Wang, Guixian Tian, Tahir Islam, Farhan Zeb Khaskhelly, Maria Aijaz Shaikh159-166
-
Ecological Supply Chain: Tools For Evaluating E-Waste – World Perspective
Liao Meihui, Maryam Khokhar, Indrajit Patra167-182
-
Analysis and Audit of Reporting on Sustainable Development for Trade Networks and Directions for Their Improvement
Alla Us, Karina Nazarova183-192
-
Evaluation Model of Environmental Sustainable Competitive Tourism Based on Entropy
Danijela Pantović, Marija Kostić, Sonja Veljović, Milica Luković193-203
-
A Study on the Impact of Reform and Opening-up on Sustainable Development: Evidence from China
Linglin Xiang, Huaixi Zhang, Yiqing Lyu204-2015
-
Supervised Credit, Government Strategies and Green Development: Evidence from China
Bingbing Zhang216-228
-
Logistics of Smart Port in Ukraine: Problems and Prospects in the Conditions of Sustainable Development
Arsen Muradian, Olexiy Kuzkin, Natalia Remzina229-241
-
Investigating the Impact of Education and Women in Agriculture on Human Capital Outcomes in Africa: An Interaction Analysis
Zhichao Yu, Romanus Osabohien242-248
-
Environment, Economy and Society – the Body, Mind and Soul of Sustainable Design of Buildings
G Venkatesh249-253
-
Artificial Intelligence and Environmental Protection of Buildings
Zheng Chen, Yu He254-262
-
Reconstruction of the Urban Historical Centre: Contemporary Problems, Difficulties, and Perspectives
Jawdat Goussous, Kabila Faris Hmood263-267
-
Changing the Narrative of Nature: Towards Sustainability
Atreyee Mukherjee268-272
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This work evaluates the crucial aspects of sustainable development (SD) related to wellbeing and quality of life, which were measured by twenty-two relevant indicators (indices) in a sample of 31 countries over the period 2010 – 2019. All the pillars of SD are reflected, while the indicators applied either reflect one of these dimensions, i.e. the economic, social or environmental pillar of SD, or two/all of them. Several of these indicators also measure specific aspects encompassed by the particular pillars, which are of great importance for SD and have to be included. These include especially health and inequality, which belong to the social pillar of SD, and are reflected in several indicators used. Furthermore, the indicator of subjective happiness is included as well. Principal component analysis (PCA) and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) are the main methods used to analyse relationships between twenty-two indicators (composite indices) reflecting crucial aspects of SD, wellbeing, and quality of life in the sample. Three stages of both analyses were carried out. For both of them similar results were identified. Principal component 1 (for PCA)/component 1 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample into the less and the more developed countries, since the positive contribution was predominantly determined by the socioeconomic, wellbeing and the more complex environmental or SD indicators, which are predominantly the highest (high) in the more developed countries. On the contrary, the negative contribution was determined by the pollution damage indicators, which are the highest in the less developed countries. Principal component 2 (for PCA)/component 2 (for PARAFAC) divided the sample according to a crucial aspect of the social pillar of SD, i.e. quality of health, particularly reflected in Healthy life years at birth (HLY), which has also poor results in the many developed countries. At the third stage this component is determined by the environmental indicators reflecting resource depletion/consumption and also pollution damages in monetary values, being crucial for SD, since a number of them had the highest values in the developed countries.
Keywords:
References
ASARA V., OTERO I., DEMARIA F., CORBERA E., 2015, Socially Sustainable Degrowth as a Social-Ecological Transformation, Sustainability Science 10(3): 375-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0321-9
ATKINSON A.B., 1970, On the Measurement of Inequality, Journal of Economic Theory 2(3): 244-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6
BEEKS J.C., 2016, Which of the current diverse ideas on alternative Economics are the best for adequately and Compre-hensively addressing the great Transition to climate, energy and biodiversity Sustainability? California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco, CA.
BELING A.E., VANHULST J., DEMARIC F., RABI V., CARBALLO A. E., PELENC J., 2018, Discursive Synergies for a ‘Great Transformation’ Towards Sustainability: Pragmatic Contributions to a Necessary Dialogue Between Human Development, Degrowth, and Buen Vivir, Ecological Economics 144: 304-313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025
BENKING H., MEHLMANN M., 2017, #30 Visions of Sustainability – 2017, https://www.academia.edu/41755849/_30_Visions_of_Sustainability_2017?email_work_card=title (26.09.2021).
DRASTICHOVA M., 2018, The Theory and Measurement of Sustainable Development, SAEI, 52, VSB-TU Ostrava, Ostrava.
DRASTICHOVA M., FILZMOSER P., 2019, Assessment of Sustainable Development Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 14(2): 7-24.
DRASTICHOVA M., FILZMOSER P., 2021, Factors of Quality of Life in a Group of Selected European Union and OECD Countries, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 16(2): 75-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.2.09
ECG, 2021, The Economy for the Common Good, https://www.ecogood.org/what-is-ecg/theory-behind-ecg/ (14.01.2022).
ECKERSLEY R., 2006, Progress, sustainability and human well-being: is a new worldview emerging? International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 1(4):304-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2006.013733
EUROSTAT, 2021, Eurostat Database, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (28.09.2021).
FITOUSSJ.P., SEN A. K., STIGLITZ J. E., 2011, Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Add Up, The New Press, New York.
FRITZ M., KOCH M., 2016, Economic development and prosperity patterns around the world: Structural challenges for a global steady-state economy, Global Environmental Change 38: 41-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.007
GEISENDORF S., PIETRULLA F., 2017, The circular economy and circular economic concepts-a literature analysis and redefinition, Thunderbird International Business Review 60, https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21924
GNEGNE Y., 2009, Adjusted Net Saving and Welfare Change, Ecological Economics 68(4): 1127-1139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.002
GUOMEI Z., JUN Z., HUAYOU L., JING W., ANDERSON R., LINDHJEM H., VENNEMO H., VICINI G., 2006, International experiences with environmental and economic accounting PRCEE, ECON and FEEM.
HELLIWELL J.F., LAYARD R., SACHS J. D., DE NEVE J.-E., AKNIN L., WANG S., 2021, World Happiness Re-port 2021, Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York, https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2021/happiness-trust-and-deaths-under-covid-19/ (14.11.2021).
HUSSAIN M., 1994, Human geography, Rawat Publications, Jaipur.
IUCN, UNEP & WWF, 1991, Caring for the Earth: a Strategy for Sustainable Living. Gland, Switzerland.
JOHNSON R.A., WICHERND.W., 2007, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 6th ed., Pearson Education, United States.
KALLIS G., 2011, In Defence of Degrowth, Ecological Economics 70: 873-880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007
KOMIYAMA H., TAKEUCHI K., 2016, Sustainability science: building a new discipline, Sustain. Sci. 1: 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4
KOTHARI A., DEMARIA F., ACOSTA A., 2014, Buen vivir, degrowth and ecological swaraj: alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy, Development 57: 362-375, https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24
LA NOTTE A., D’AMATO D., MAKINEN H., PARACCHINI M.-L., LIQUETTE C., EGOH B., GENELETTI, D., CROSSMAN N. D., 2017, Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework, Ecological Indicators 74: 392-402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.030
LOREK S., SPANGENBERG J.H., 2014, Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy – beyond green growth and green economies, Journal of Cleaner Production 63: 33-44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045
MAES J., LIQUETE C., TELLER A., ERHARD M., PARACCHINI M. L., BARREDO J. I., GRIZZETTI B., CAR-DOSO A., SOMMA F., PETERSEN J., 2016, An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, Ecosystem services 17: 14-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
MOSTEANU D., MIHAILALICA G., HALMAGHI E.-E., MOSTEANU R., 2014. The Sustainable Development – Human Development, Management and Economics 73: 106-113.
MULLER F., BURKHARD B., 2012, The indicator side of ecosystem services, Ecosystem Services 1(1): 26-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001
O’NEILL D.W., FANNING A.L., LAMB W.F., STEINBERG J.K., 2018, A good life for all within planetary bounda-ries, Nat. Sustain. 1: 88-95, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4
RUZZENENTI F., VIVANCO D. F., GALVIN R., SORRELL S., WAGNER A., WALNUM H.J., 2019, The Rebound Effect and the Jevons' Paradox: Beyond the Conventional Wisdom, Frontiers in Energy Research 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00090
SCHUMACHER E.F., 2011, Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. Random House, New York.
SINHA B., 2019, Multidimensional Approach to Quality of Life Issues. A Spatial Analysis, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6958-2
SPANGENBERG J.H., 2014, Institutional change for strong sustainable consumption: sustainable consumption and the degrowth economy, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 10(1): 62-77, https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2014.11908125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2014.11908125
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), 2011, Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Pro-gress – OECD Indicators, Paris, France.
TEEB, 2009, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy makers – summary: responding to the value of nature 2009, TEEB, Geneva, Switzerland.
UNITED NATIONS Development Programme (UNDP), 2022, Human Development Reports, New York, USA, http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev (30.01.2022).
UNITED NATIONS Development Programme (UNDP), 2015, Human Development Report 2015. Work for Human Development, New York, USA, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_ human_development_report.pdf (13.12.2021).
UNITED NATIONS Environment Programme (UNEP), 2011, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, New York, USA.
UNITED NATIONS, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, OECD, World Bank, 2003, Handbook of National Accounting. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003, Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 61, Rev. 1 (ST/ESA/STAT/SER.F/61/Rev.1).
VAN DEN BERGH J.C.J.M., KALLIS G., 2012, Growth, A-Growth or Degrowth to Stay within Planetary Boundaries?, J. Econ. 46: 909-920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460404
WALLACE K.J., 2007, Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions, Biological Conservation 139: 235-246, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015
WCED, 1987, Our common future, Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York.
WIEDMANN T.O., SCHNADL H., LENZEN M., MORAN D., SUH S., WEST J., KANEMOTO K., 2015, The material footprint of nations, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(20): 6271-6, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110
WORLD BANK, 2021, Data Bank, Adjusted Net Savings, https://databank.banquemondiale.org/source/adjusted-net-savings/preview/on.
WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE, 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC, http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
Article Details
Abstract views: 448
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
