Possibilities of Developing Sustainable World by Introducing Bioeconomy: Global Perspective
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 17 No. 1 (2022)
-
The Efficiency of Health Systems in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the EU Countries
Tamara Rađenović, Vladimir Radivojević, Bojan Krstić, Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Živković7-15
-
Efficiency Assessment of Tax Measures in the European Countries Against the Effects of COVID-19
Daria Bilenko, Serhii Kozlovskyi, Natalya Ivanyuta, Viktoriia Baidala, Ruslan Lavrov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi16-22
-
Formation of Sustainable Investment Attractiveness of Regions Under the Conditions of COVID-19
Tetiana Polozova, Yurii Kutsenko, Oleksandra Kanova23-35
-
Going Green Supply Chain Management During COVID-19, Assessing the Best Supplier Selection Criteria: A Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Approach
Maryam Khokhar, Sayma Zia, Tahir Islam, Anshuman Sharma, Wasim Iqbal, Muhammad Irshad36-51
-
Empowering Theory of Poverty Reduction for Sustainable Development: Does the Welfare of Descendants Matter?
Juliusz Piwowarski, Larysa Yankovska, Bohdan-Petro Koshovyi, Ira Von-Nagy, Andrii Yevstakhevych52-63
-
Natural Resources in Function of Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Development of the EU Countries
Tanja Stanišić, Snežana Milićević, Bojan Krstić64-70
-
Suitability of Rural Living & Work Facilities, Spatial Behavior of Farmers and Family Income
Yanling Mao, Na Li71-83
-
Sustainable Development and Religion. A European Perspective
Paweł Rydzewski84-95
-
Role of Religion in Environmental Sustainability: An Indian Perspective
Sarita Kar, Manisha Tripathy96-100
-
Analysis of Child Marriage and Related Policies in Indonesia: Sustainable Development Issue
Noverman Duadji, Novita Tresiana101-113
-
Inclusive Education as a Tool For Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals on the Basis of Humanization of Society
Oksana Zhukova, Larysa Platash, Liudmyla Tymchuk114-122
-
What is Right and What is Wrong in the Environmental Governance Model? Environmental Regulations for Improving Environmental Sustainability Ratings
Jajat S. Ardiwinata, Khalid Zaman, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Mohamed Haffar, Chairil Faif Pasani, Sriyanto Sriyanto123-139
-
Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Government Financial Expenditure on Environmental Protection: An SBM Super-efficiency Model Based on Undesired Outputs
Su Jialu, Ma Zhiqiang, Li Mingxing, Fredrick Oteng Agyeman, Zhu Yue140-150
-
Studies on Improving the Performance of Small and Micro Enterprises through Green Innovation
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu151-161
-
Possibilities of Developing Sustainable World by Introducing Bioeconomy: Global Perspective
Oleh V. Skydan, Maryna I. Yaremova, Liudmyla V. Tarasovych, Vitalii Ye. Dankevych, Nataliia M. Kutsmus162-170
-
Green Economy – Vector of Sustainable Development
Anar Ospanova, Iryna Popovychenko, Elena Chuprina171-181
-
Challenges for Improving Agricultural Resilience in the Context of Sustainability and Rural Development
Mangirdas Morkunas, Agnė Žičkienė, Tomas Baležentis, Artiom Volkov, Dalia Štreimikienė, Erika Ribašauskienė182-195
-
Time-Frequency Co-Movements Between Biomass Energy Consumption and Human Development in Brics Countries
Ngo Thai Hung196-210
-
Impact of the Agreements of the Eurasian Economic Union on the Competitiveness of the Agricultural Sector of the Member States
Saule S. Shintaeva, Alexandr A. Pyagay, Makhabbat K. Iskakova, Botagoz N. Naukenova, Saule T. Zhumasheva211-221
-
Air Pollution Regulations in China: A Policy Simulation Approach with Evolutionary Game
Zhaopeng Chu, Chen Bian, Jun Yang222-233
-
Feminist Mining: A Step Towards Sustainable Mininig in India
Priya Singh, Ajit Kumar Behura235-245
-
Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment and Sustainable Agriculture in Africa
Ping Ju, Muhammad Khalid Anser, Romanus Osabohien, Onyinye Ochuba, Rolle Remi Ahuru, Junaid Ashraf246-255
-
Systematic Review on Urban Ecosystem Services in South-East Asia: Asean Countries
Nur Shazwanie Rosehan, Azlan Abas, Kadaruddin Aiyub256-266
-
Financial Development and Sustainable Competitiveness in Arctic Region: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis
Farzan Yahya, Ghulam Abbas, Muhammad Hussain, Muhammad Waqas267-278
-
Green Energy in the Caribbean: Influence on Toursim and Economic Development
Tatiana Tazikhina, Vladimir Kvasha, Yulia Solovova, Igbal Guliev279-287
-
Samkhya Philosophy, Deep Ecology and Sustainable Development
Nanda Gopal Biswas, Gyan Prakash288-292
-
Reproduction of Human Capital as a Strategic Priority for Sustainable Development of Regions
Olena Krasnonosova, Daria Mykhailenko, Ihor Yaroshenko293-300
-
Environmental Aspects of the European Experience in Landscape Planning
Bao Yu, Jianmei Wang, Ya Li301-309
Archives
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
At the time of the study, the world economy is attempting to form a resource-efficient policy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the evolution of the development of strategies and tactics of bioeconomic policy in the international space. The study substantiated the specific features of the implementation of special state and regional programmes of the advanced countries of the world, which differ in socio-economic ideas and prospects for their implementation. The comparative review of strategies identified similarities and differences between them, which allowed to differentiate strategic documents for the implementation of bioeconomic policy in certain areas. The study provides graphic visualisation of distribution of the countries according to the established orientation. The authors of the study proved the convergent difference of bioeconomic policy within each of the above areas by development goals, key objectives, and means of achieving them in a certain spatial dimension.
Keywords:
References
A Forest Bioeconomy Framework For Canada, 2017, https://www.ccfm.org/pdf/10a%20Document%20-%20Forest%20Bioeconomy%20Framework%20for%20Canada%20-%20E.pdf (12.10.2020).
A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection Between Economy, Society and the Environment, 2018, https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/ec_bioeconomy_strategy_2018.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none (21.10.2020).
ASADA R., CARDELLINI G., MAIR-BAUERNFEIND C., WENGER J., HAAS V., HOLZER D., STERN T., 2020, Effective Bioeconomy? A MRIOBased Socioeconomic and Environmental Impact Assessment of Generic Sectoral Innovations, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153:119946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119946
BAIDALA V.V., 2017, Macroeconomic Factors of Bioeconomy Development, National University of Bioresources and Natural History of Ukraine, Kyiv.
BIKSE V., LUSENA-EZERA I., VOLKOVA T., RIVZA B., 2019, European Bioeconomy Policy and New Opportunities for Bio-Based Business Development, International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, 19(5.3): 317-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/5.3/S21.040
Bioeconomy Policy, Part I Synopsis and Analysis of Strategies in the G7, 2015, https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/bioeconomy-policy-synopsis-analysis-strategies-g7_en (16.10.2020).
Bioeconomy Policy, Part II, Synopsis of National Strategies Around the World, 2015, https://biooekonomierat.de/fileadmin/international/Bioeconomy-Policy_Part-II.pdf (26.10.2020).
Bioeconomy Policy, Part III, Update Report of National Strategies Around the World, 2018, https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/bioeconomy-policy-part-iii-update-report-national-strategies-around-world_en (13.10.2020).
BUTENKO V.M., 2016, Bioeconomics as a Mechanism for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals, Bulletin of Agrarian Science of the Black Sea Coast, 1: 19-28.
ENRIQUEZ J., 1998, Genomics and the World’s Economy, Science, 281: 925-926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5379.925
GEORGESCU-ROEGEN N., 1971, The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674281653
Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe, 2012, https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/official-strategy_en.pdf (18.10.2020).
KELLEHER L., HENCHION M., O’NEILL E., 2019, Policy Coherence and the Transition to a Bioeconomy: The Case of Ireland, Sustainability, 11: 7247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247247
MAES D., VAN PASSEL S., 2019, Effective Bioeconomy Policies for the Uptake of Innovative Technologies under Resource Constraints, Biomass and Bioenergy, 120: 91-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.008
MCCORNICK K., KAUTO N., 2013, The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview, Sustainability, 5:2589-2608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589
MEYER R., 2017, Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates, Sustainability, 9(6): 1031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061031
National Policy Strategy on Bioeconomy, 2014, http://www.bioways.eu/download.php?f=62&l=en&key=c21c2ea7e095424f3545c66da7b98821 (12.10.2020).
National Research Strategy Bioeconomy 2030, 2011, https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/national-research-strategy-bioeconomy-2030_en (11.10.2020).
PHILP J., 2018, The Bioeconomy, the Challenge of the Century for Policy Makers, New Biotechnology, 40: 11-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.004
POTOCHNIK J., 2005, Transforming Life Sciences Knowledge into New, Sustainable, Eco-Efficient and Competitive Products, Conference on Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_05_513 (12.10.2020).
PROSHCHALYKINA A.M., 2016, Preconditions of Bioeconomy’s Formation and Development, http://www.m.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&j=efektyvnaekonomika&s=ua&z=5314 (18.10.2020).
RAMCILOVIC-SUOMINEN S., PÜLZL H., 2018, Sustainable Development – A ‘Selling Point’ of the Emerging EU Bioeconomy Policy Framework? Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 4170-4180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157
Recommendation to Build Alberta’s Bioeconomy, 2013, https://albertainnovates.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/bioe_final_report_web_may2013.pdf (12.10.2020).
SCHÜTTE G., 2018, What Kind of Innovation Policy does the Bioeconomy Need?, New Biotechnology, 40: 82-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003
STAFFAS L., GUSTAVSSON M., MCCORMICK K., 2013, Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches, Sustainability, 5: 2751-2769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062751
Swedish Research and Innovation Strategy for a Bio-based Economy, 2012, https://www.formas.se/download/18.462d60ec167c69393b91e60f/1549956
/Strategy_Biobased_Ekonomy_hela.pdf (24.10.2020).
TALAVYRIA M.P., 2015, Development of BioOriented Economy on a Scientific Basis, Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University, 1(2): 225-229.
The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda, 2009, https://www.oecd.org/futures/longtermtechnologicalsocietalchallenges/42837897.pdf (15.10.2020).
The Canadian Blueprint: Beyond Moose and Mountains, 2009, https://issuu.com/biotecanada_insights/docs/beyondmm_english_final (24.10.2020).
The European Bioeconomy in 2030, 2011, http://www.plantetp.org/system/files/publications/files/thhe_european_bioeconomy_brochure_web_final.pdf (19.10.2020).
URMETZER S., SCHLAILE M.P., BOGNER K.B., MUELLER M., PYKA A., 2018, Exploring the Dedicated Knowledge Base of a Transformation Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy, Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6): 1694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061694
VIAGGI D., 2018, Bioeconomy and the Common Agricultural Policy: Will a Strategy in Search of Policies Meet a Policy in Search of Strategies? Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 7(2): 179-190.
Article Details
Abstract views: 185
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
