Does Technology Support Sustainable Development?
Konrad Waloszczyk
Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej, Centrum Edukacji Bezpieczeństwa Powszechnego, ul. Słowackiego 52/54, 01 – 629 Warszawa, Poland (Poland)
Abstract
With some notable exceptions like James Lovelock, ecologists have tended to charge contemporary technology, not only with destroying the natural environment, but also with an assault on ethical and spiritual values. The recent author best representing this school of thought in Poland has been Henryk Skolimowski, a former Professor of ecological philosophy at Ann Arbor University (USA). Others among Poland’s ecologist-authors, like Andrzej Kiepas or Zbigniew Hull, maintain a more balanced position. In the light of that, the main goal of this text has been the presentation and evaluation of the lack of agreement between Polish and other philosophers and ecological thinkers when it comes to the evaluation of technology. Outlined first is the historical dissonance between philosophers considering the expansion of technology as threatening to humanist or ecological values (e.g. Spengler, Toynbee, Heidegger, Ellul) and those who generally regard it as a factor allowing for progress (Dewey, Hayek, Teilhard de Chardin). Certain distinctions in relation to different branches of technology are then drawn. Today’s military, transport or energy systems are the subject of censure as on the whole unsustainable; while biotechnology as still under discussion. In contrast, telecommunications, especially the Internet, anesthesiology in medicine and the mechanization of domestic labor are all cited as examples of definitively positive technological achievements. To sum up, contemporary technological development is on balance more likely to be seen as advantageous, and capable of supporting sustainable development. However, the criticism of the more extreme dissident intellectuals deserves to be taken seriously. 82 The final question posed here concerns the justification of the sharp distinction widely drawn between technological and moral progress. It seems that, when it comes to technological change for the good of the physical and social framework in which people exercise their immediate moral behavior, connecting people, diminishing suffering and sublimating physical effort, these can also be equated with moral progress.
Keywords:
science, technology, sustainable development, moral progressReferences
CZUANG-TSY, Prawdziwa księga południowego kwiatu, przeł. Jabłoński W., Chmielewski J., Łukasiewicz O., PWN, Warszawa 1953.
Google Scholar
DEVALL B., SESSIONS G., Ekologia głęboka, przeł. Margielewicz E., wyd. Pusty Obłok, Warszawa 1995 (or. 1985).
Google Scholar
FINKIELKRAUT A., Europy prawie już nie ma (wywiad udzielony Włodek-Biernat L.), „Gazeta Wyborcza” n. 143 (21.VI. 2007), s. 16.
Google Scholar
FUKUYAMA F., Wielki wstrząs. Natura ludzka a odbudowa porządku społecznego., przeł. Komorowska H. i Dorosz K., wyd. Politeja, Warszawa 2000 (or. 1999).
Google Scholar
GÓRNY M., Ekorozwój wsi i rolnictwa, wyd. Duszpasterstwa Rolników, Włocławek 2002.
Google Scholar
KAMIEŃSKA B., Życie wymyka się spod kontroli, „Zielone Brygady”, 2/2007.
Google Scholar
HEIDEGGER M., Gelassenheit, G. Neske Pfullingen Verlag, Tübingen 1959 (or. 1955).
Google Scholar
HUBIG CHR. (red.), Technik: die Klassiker der Technikphilosophie, ed. Sigma, Berlin 2000.
Google Scholar
HULL Z., Czy idea sustainable development ukazuje nową wizję rozwoju cywilizacyjnego? w: „Problemy Ekorozwoju. Studia Ffilozoficzno-Sozologiczne”, vol. 2, no. 1 (2007) s. 49 – 57.
Google Scholar
JAN PAWEŁ II, enc. Redemptor hominis, 1979.
Google Scholar
JONAS H., Zasada odpowiedzialności, przeł. Klimowicz M., wyd. Platan, Kraków 1996 (or. 1983).
Google Scholar
KIEPAS A., Człowiek wobec dylematów filozofii techniki, wyd. Gnome, Katowice 2000.
Google Scholar
KROES P., „Technology, philosophy of” w: Craig E., Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge, London 1998, t. 8, s. 284 – 288.
Google Scholar
LIGOCKI A. B., Ziemia na rozdrożu – wyzwania i dylematy ery biologii, „Nauka” 4/2006.
Google Scholar
NISBET R., History of the Idea of Progress, Basic Books, New York 1980.
Google Scholar
ROSZAK TH., The Voice of the Earth, Bantam Press, London 1993.
Google Scholar
SCHÜTZ E. (RED.); Kultura techniki: studia i szkice, Sellmer I. i S., Wyd. Poznańskie, Poznań 2001.
Google Scholar
SKOLIMOWSKI H., Philosophy for a New Civilisation, wyd. Gyan Publishing House, New Delhi 2005.
Google Scholar
SKOLIMOWSKI H., Filozofia Żyjąca, przeł. Wojciechowski J., wyd. Pusty Obłok, Warszawa 1994;
Google Scholar
SKOLIMOWSKI H., Technika a przeznaczenie człowieka, wyd. Etos, Warszawa 1995.
Google Scholar
SOBÓR WAT. II (1965), konst. Gaudium et spes.
Google Scholar
SORMAN G., Prawdziwi myśliciele naszych czasów, przeł. Miszalski M., Czytelnik, Warszawa 1993.
Google Scholar
SPENGLER O., Der Mensch und die Technik. Beitrag zu einer Philosophie des Lebens. C. H. Beck Verlag, München 1931.
Google Scholar
ZOGLAUER TH. (red.), Technikphilosophie, K. Alber Verlag, Freiburg 2002.
Google Scholar
Authors
Konrad WaloszczykSzkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej, Centrum Edukacji Bezpieczeństwa Powszechnego, ul. Słowackiego 52/54, 01 – 629 Warszawa, Poland Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 10PDF downloads: 0
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
