Responsibility for Nature versus Gene-Centred View on Evolution by Richard Dawkins

Anna Marek Bieniasz


Akademia im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie, Zakład Filozofii WFSiP, ul. J. Waszyngtona 4/8, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland (Poland)


Abstract

Through the indication and criticism of unacceptable consequences that follow the concept of genocentrism, as propagated by Dawkins, the author has endeavoured to show that it cannot be regarded as a justified paradigm of understanding the world. The same empirical facts can be interpreted in different ways. Dawkins sees the nature as existing for the genes’ benefit, whereas he regards the existence of all other organisms, including man, as subordinate to it. Non-reductionist  vision of man and other living organisms must be, however, connected with another, nongenocentric perspective of explaining biological facts, including such phenomena as symbiosis, both reciprocated and unreciprocated altruism, and other. Genocentrism can be perceived as interpretative obstacle precluding their appropriate understanding. Much more justified seems to be the individualist centric paradigm, in the light of which – to tell the truth – not all that is going on in nature can be explained yet, but which does  not require, as opposed to genocentrism, resignation from holism or seeing man as being free in his nature and responsible for themselves and the world.


Keywords:

Gene-Centred, Responsibility, Genes, Nature, Evolution

BLACKMORE S., The Meme Machine, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999.
  Google Scholar

DAWKINS R., Rozplatanie tęczy. Nauka, złudzenia i apetyt na cuda, przeł. M. Betley, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa 2001.
  Google Scholar

DAWKINS R., Samolubny gen, przeł., M. Skoneczny, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa 2003.
  Google Scholar

FISCHER R.A., The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1930.
  Google Scholar

GOULD S.J., Niewczesny pogrzeb Darwina, Wybór esejów, przeł. N. Kancewicz-Hoffman, PIW, Warszawa 1991.
  Google Scholar

JONAS H., Zasada odpowiedzialności. Etyka dla cywilizacji technologicznej, przeł. M. Klimowicz, Wydawnictwo Platan, Kraków 1996.
  Google Scholar

MAREK-BIENIASZ A., R. Dawkinsa genocentryczna interpretacja ewolucji i jej zasadność. Analiza krytyczna, Wydawnictwo Akademii im. Jana Długosza, Częstochowa 2008.
  Google Scholar

MAYR E., To jest biologia. Nauka o świecie ożywionym, przeł. J. Szacki, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa 2002.
  Google Scholar

MCGRATH A., COLLICUT MCGRATH J., Bóg nie jest urojeniem, Złudzenie Dawkinsa, przeł. J. Wolak, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2007.
  Google Scholar

MONOD J., Przypadek i konieczność. Esej o filozofii biologii współczesnej, przeł. J. Bukowski, Głos, Warszawa 1979.
  Google Scholar

MUTSCHLER H-D., Wprowadzenie do filozofii przyrody. Wybrane zagadnienia, przeł. J. Bremer SJ, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2005.
  Google Scholar

NOBLE D., The Music of Life: Biology Beyond the Genome, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006.
  Google Scholar

ROSE S., KAMIN L.J., LEWONTIN R.C., Not In Our Genes, Penguin, London 1984.
  Google Scholar

SCHWEITZER A., Życie, przeł. J. Piechowski, Instytut Wydawniczy PAX, Warszawa 1974.
  Google Scholar

SZARSKI H., Mechanizmy ewolucji, PWN, Warszawa 1989.
  Google Scholar

WILLIAMS G.C., Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1966.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2009-07-01

Cited by

Bieniasz, A. M. (2009). Responsibility for Nature versus Gene-Centred View on Evolution by Richard Dawkins. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 4(2), 114–118. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/4699

Authors

Anna Marek Bieniasz 

Akademia im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie, Zakład Filozofii WFSiP, ul. J. Waszyngtona 4/8, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 10
PDF downloads: 4