Triple Bottom Line Approach to Individual and Global Sustainability
G. Venkatesh
Department of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, S P Andersensv 5, Trondheim, Norway, NO-7491 (Norway)
Abstract
Industrial ecology is founded on analogies and lateral thinking, borrowing and adapting, and opening up the frontiers of imagination and innovativeness to make the road to sustainable development more tractable. Talking of the key role mankind needs to play to make sustainable development a reality, a wonderful analogy is uncovered – between holistic individual human development and the triple bottom line approach (economic, social and environmental) to sustainable progress of humanity as a whole on the surface of the earth. An individual starts off from gross materialism (body) but needs to aim for the right blend of physical, emotional and spiritual advancement in life. When all individuals do so, a lop-sided socio-economic techno-sphere will gradually metamorphose into a fully-evolved one. Paradoxically, individuals need to delve in and comprehend their spiritual selves, for the technosphere to fan out and embrace the earth of which it is just a small component.
Keywords:
Economic, environmental, physical, social, spiritual, sustainabilityReferences
The Bhagavad Gita, Interpretation by Swami Chinmayananda.
Google Scholar
CLARK RW., Einstein - The Life and Times, Avon Books, HarperCollins 1972.
Google Scholar
DAS JN., 2005, Simple Living and High Thinking, Bhaktivedanta Ashram, http://www.bvashram.org.
Google Scholar
DELIO I., 2008, Is Spirituality the Future of Theology: Insights from Bonaventure, in: Spiritus 8, p. 148-155.
Google Scholar
DEMPSEY C J., 2004, Book Review, in: Spiritus 5.1.
Google Scholar
GANESH N., 2008, Change is Constant, in: The Times of India, Dec 28, 2009.
Google Scholar
GIDDIIDDINGS B, HOPWOOD B., O’BRIEN G., 2002, Environment, Economy and Society: Fitting Them Together Into Sustainable Development, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 10, issue 4, p. 187-196.
Google Scholar
GRAM-HANSSEN K., 2007, Teenage Consumption of Cleanliness: How to Make it Sustainable in: Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, vol. 3, issue 2, p. 15-23.
Google Scholar
GREY M C., Sacred Longings: The Ecological Spirit and Global Culture, Fortress Press, Minneapolis 2004.
Google Scholar
GUGGEHEIM D., An Inconvenient Truth (the movie), Participant Productions, Paramount Classics, 2006.
Google Scholar
The Holy Bible – The New Testament.
Google Scholar
ISLAM S., Ramadan – Lessons to Learn, Meanings to See, in: Reading Islam, ‘Mercy for all’ Endowment, Qatar, http://www.reading islam.com (1.03.2010).
Google Scholar
JUNG L.S., Food for life: The spirituality and Ethics of Eating, Fortress Press, Minneapolis 2004.
Google Scholar
KEMP R, MARTENS P., 2007, Sustainable Development: How to Manage Something that is Subjective and Never Can be Achieved, in: Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, vol. 3, issue 2, p. 5-14.
Google Scholar
RAJESWAR J., 2001, Conservation Ethics Versus Development: How to Obviate the Dichotomy, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 9, issue 1, p. 16-23.
Google Scholar
SWAMI VIVEKANANDA, 1896, The Necessity of Religion, Transcript of Lecture Delivered in London, Vivekananda Vedanta Network, http://www.vivekananda.org.
Google Scholar
VENKATESH G., 2006, The Meek Shall Save the Earth, http://www.eco-web.com.
Google Scholar
Authors
G. VenkateshDepartment of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, S P Andersensv 5, Trondheim, Norway, NO-7491 Norway
Statistics
Abstract views: 6PDF downloads: 8
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
