Environmentally Sustainable National Income and Other Ways to Improve Information About Growth
Roefie Hueting
Foundation for Research on Sustainable National Income, Delft, Roelofsstraat 6, The Hague (Netherlands)
Abstract
All economic actions are directed to the satisfaction of wants, or in other words: to welfare. Welfare is defined as the satisfaction of wants derived from our dealings with scarce goods. It is a category of personal experience and not measurable in cardinal units. Therefore we have to make do with indicators that are measurable in cardinal units and that are arguably influencing welfare. The cardinal indicator and the ordinal welfare have, of course, to develop in the same direction.
Economic growth is generally defined as increase of national income (NI) (or GDP) as a measure of production. However, according to the subject matter of economics, economic growth can mean nothing other than increase in welfare. Welfare is dependent on more factors than solely production. It is also dependent on employment, income distribution, labour conditions, leisure time and the scarce possible uses of the non-human-made physical surroundings: the environmental functions. These objectives or ends are often in conflict. Therefore welfare can increase with decreasing production.
The narrow minded, theoretical wrong definition of economic growth is especially threatening the current and future availability of environmental functions, the most fundamental scarce and consequently economic goods at the disposal of humanity. These fall outside the market and outside the measurement of NI. Correct information is decisive for the coming into being of the preferences of individuals and institutions and consequently for the decision making process. Therefore it is of the utmost importance to correct the current misleading information. In the paper five relatively simple ways are discussed to correct the wrong information about growth.
The concept of environmental functions is defined as the possible uses of the non-human-made physical surroundings on which humanity is entirely dependent.
Keywords:
environmental function, economic growth, environmentally sustainable national income, employment, asymmetric entriesReferences
BOULDING K., What do we Want to Sustain? Environmentalism and Human Evaluations, in: Ecological Economics, ed. Costanza R., Columbia University Press, 1991.
Google Scholar
BROWN L.R., FLAYIN C., FRENCH H., State of the World 1998, W.W. Norton, New York 1998.
Google Scholar
BRUNDTLAND G.H. (World Commission on Environment and Development), Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987.
Google Scholar
COLIGNATUS T., The Old Man and the SNI, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, http://mpra.ub.unimuencheb.de/12690, 2008.
Google Scholar
DE HAAN M., Accounting for Goods and for Bads, Statistics Netherlands 2004.
Google Scholar
DALY H., Toward a Steady State Economy, Freeman, San Francisco 1973.
Google Scholar
GOODLAND R., 1995, The Concept of Environmental Sustainability, in: Aun. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, p. 1-24.
Google Scholar
HEERTJE A,. Echte economie, P.138, Valkhof Pers, Nijmegen 2006.
Google Scholar
HUETING R., Functions of Nature: Should Nature Be Quantified? World Wildlife Fund, London 1969.
Google Scholar
HUETING R., New Scarcity and Economic Growth, Dutch edition: Agon Elsevier 1974. English edition: North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford 1980.
Google Scholar
HUETING R., Some Comments on the Report A Low Energy Strategy for the United Kingdom, compilled by Leach G. et al. for the International Institute for Environment and Development, paper prepared for the working party on Integral Energy Scenarios, Den Haag 1981.
Google Scholar
HUETING R., 1987, An Economic Scenario That Gives Top Priority to Saving the Environment’, in: Ecological Modelling 38 (1/2), p. 123-140.
Google Scholar
HUETING R.., Correcting National Income for Environmental Losses: Towards a Practical Solution, in: Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development, eds. Ahmad Y., El Serafy S., Lutz E., The World Bank, Washington, D.C. 1989, p. 32-39.
Google Scholar
HUETING R., 1990, The Brundtland Report: A Matter of Conflicting Goals’, in: Ecological Economics 2, p. 109-117.
Google Scholar
HUETING R., 1991, The Use of the Discount Rate in a Cost-Benefit Analysis for Different Uses of a Humid Tropical Forest Area’, in: Ecological Economics 3(1), p. 43-57.
Google Scholar
HUETING R., The Economic Functions of the Environment, in: Real-life Economics, eds. Ekins P., Max-Neef M., Routledge, London, New York 1992, p. 61-69.
Google Scholar
HUETING R., 1996, Three Persistent Myths in the Environmental Debate, in: Ecological Economics 18, p. 81-88.
Google Scholar
HUETING R., BOSCH P., DE BOER B., Methodology for the Calculation of a Sustainable National Income, Statistics Netherlands, Statistical Essays, M 44, The Hague, SDU Publishers, 1992. Also published as: WWF International Report, Gland 1992.
Google Scholar
HUETING R., DE BOER B., Environmental Valuation and Sustainable National Income According to Hueting, in: Economic Growth and Valuation of the Environment: A Debate, eds. Van Ierland E. C. et al., Edward Elgar, London 2001, p. 17-77.
Google Scholar
IUCN, The World Conservation Strategy, WWF/IUCN, Gland 1980.
Google Scholar
KAPP K.W., The Social Costs of Private Enterprise, Cambridge Mass. 1950.
Google Scholar
REIJNDERS L., Environmentally Improved Production Processes and Products, Kluwer Scientific Publishers, Dordtrecht 1996.
Google Scholar
TINBERGEN J., HUETING R., GNP and Market Prices: Wrong Signals for Sustainable Economic Success that Mask Environmental Destruction, in: Environmentally Sustainable Economic Development: Building on Brundtland, eds. Goodland R, Daly H., El Serafy S., Von Droste B, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris 1991; also published in: GOODLAND R. et al., Population, Technology and Lifestyle, The Transition to Sustainability, Island Press, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and UNESCO, Washington D.C. 1992; also published in: Goodland R. et al., Environmentally Sustainable Economic Development: Building on Brundtland, Environment Working Paper No 46, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. 1991.
Google Scholar
VERBRUGGEN H., DELLINK R.B., GERLACH R., HOFKES M.W., JANSEN H.M.A., Alternative Calculations of a Sustainable National Income for the Netherlands According to Hueting, in: Economic Growth and Valuation of the Environment: A Debate, eds. Van Ierland EC et al., Edward Elgar, London 2001, p. 275-312.
Google Scholar
Authors
Roefie HuetingFoundation for Research on Sustainable National Income, Delft, Roelofsstraat 6, The Hague Netherlands
Statistics
Abstract views: 11PDF downloads: 5
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
