Theory of sustainable development and social practice
Stefan Konstańczak
University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Philosophy, al. Wojska Polskiego 71A, 65-762 Zielona Góra (Poland)
Abstract
The paper shows, that the hopes associated with globalisation, which were also supposed to overcome the effects of the ecological crisis, have not been fulfilled. This situation is associated with the fact that nowadays the biggest influence on the functioning of the global ecosystem is by man himself, who exists simultaneously in two environments: social and cultural. According to the author, all crises are global and furthermore embrace both environments in which man functions. Therefore, people are most at risk to pay for every crisis, including the ecological one. Human communities would be able to function in any environment, if they accept and implement sustainable development, which includes the functioning of the anthroposphere and the biosphere at the same time. Communities which were unable to do so, collapsed and even disappeared. In conclusion, the author claims that even today there is such a requirement. Today’s advocated sustainable development ensues from our species’ historical experiences. The implementation of sustainable development could provide the best optimal development conditions for both mankind and the natural environment.
Keywords:
eco-development, sustainable development, anthroposphere, biosphere, ecological crisis, safety, strategies of crisis’ overcomingReferences
ARENDT H., O rewolucji, X, Kraków 1991.
Google Scholar
DORST J., Siły życia, PIW, Warszawa 1987.
Google Scholar
EPIKUR, Listy, maksymy i sentencje, De Agostini, Warszawa 2003.
Google Scholar
GOODIN R.E., Green Political Theory, Polity, Cambridge 1992.
Google Scholar
JONAS H., Zasada odpowiedzialności. Etyka dla cywilizacji technologicznej, Platan, Kraków 1996.
Google Scholar
KOZŁOWSKI S., Ekorozwój. Wyzwanie XXI wieku, PWN, Warszawa 2000.
Google Scholar
KRÓL M., Filozofia polityczna, Znak, Kraków 2008.
Google Scholar
KUBIAK A., Twarz wroga, Próba fenomenologii protagonizmu, Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Rzeszów 2008.
Google Scholar
MIKIEWICZ P., Przyczyny globalnego kryzysu ekologicznego według krytyków współczesnej globalizacji, in: Państwa – regiony – świat w kształtującej się rzeczywistości globalnej, eds. Kamińska K., Mrozowska S., Piwnicki G., Uniwersytet Gdański, Gdańsk 2009, p. 476-481.
Google Scholar
MORIN E., Les sept savoirs nécessaires à l’éducation du futur, UNESCO, Paris 1999.
Google Scholar
NISBET R., Przesądy. Słownik filozoficzny, Aletheia, Warszawa 1998.
Google Scholar
PAWŁOWSKI L. 2011, Rola monitoringu środowiska w realizacji zrównoważonego rozwoju, in: Annual Set The Environmental Protection/Rocznik Ochrony Środowiska, vol. 13, p. 333-345.
Google Scholar
PIĄTEK Z., 2011, Czy społeczeństwo ‘opętane ekologią’ stanowi zagrożenie ludzkiej wolności i demokracji?, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no 1, p. 83-94.
Google Scholar
RIDLEY M., O pochodzeniu cnoty, Rebis, Poznań 2000.
Google Scholar
ROTKIEWICZ M., 2010, Człowiek człowiekowi człowiekiem – rozmowa z prof. Dawidem Livingstonem Smithem, in: Polityka, no 19, p. 65-66.
Google Scholar
UN, The Millennium Development Goals Report, http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/11_MDG%20Report_EN.pdf (15.12.2012).
Google Scholar
WALLERSTEIN I., Utopistics: Or Historical Choices of the Twenty-First Century, New Press, New York 1998.
Google Scholar
WCED, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York 1987.
Google Scholar
ZDANOWSKA M., 2012, Pożegnanie z ekologią?, in: Znak, no 2 (681), p. 6-9.
Google Scholar
Authors
Stefan KonstańczakUniversity of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Philosophy, al. Wojska Polskiego 71A, 65-762 Zielona Góra Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 11PDF downloads: 5
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
