Selected methods of water resources accounting in the aspect of sustainable development

Marcin K. Widomski


Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 40B, 20-618 Lublin (Poland)


Abstract

Fresh water is one of the most important natural resources required by the societies’ proper operation to meet their biological and industrial needs. Thus, water is a key resource, which availability or scarcity, should be considered carefully in strategies of sustainable social, economic and technical development, with full respect to nature and rules of intergenerational justice. Preservation of fresh water resources for the next generations is highly required by the rule of sustainable development, which results in the need for water accounting for industry and services located in the given watershed as well as for the proper, sustainable water management. This paper contains presentation and analysis of five popular methods used in industrial water accounting i.e. Water Footprint, Life Cycle Assessment, Global Water Tool, Water Sustainability Tools and the exemplary industrial method developed by Schornagel. The apllicational abilities of the described methods and the attempt of the presented methods assessment in compliance to the three main priorities of sustainable development were discussed. The set of basic requirements met by the method orientated towards sustainable development was also presented.


Keywords:

sustainable development, water resources, industrial water demand, waste water, industrial water balance, sustainable water management

ARTHUR J. D., URETSKY M., WILSON P., Water Resources and Use for Hydraulic Fracturing in the Marcellus Shale Region, ALL Consulting, LLC 2010.
  Google Scholar

BAJKIEWICZ-GRABOWSKA E., MIKULSKI Z., Hydrologia ogólna, PWN, Warszawa 1999.
  Google Scholar

BAYART J-B, BULLE C, DESCHENES L, MARGNI M, PFISTER S, VINCE F, 2010, A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use, in: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment vol. 15, p. 439-453.
  Google Scholar

BHAMIDIMARRI R., BUTLER K., 1998, Environmental engineering education at the millenium: An integrated approach, in: Water Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 11, p. 311-314
  Google Scholar

CHEŁMICKI W., Woda. Zasoby, degradacja, ochrona, PWN, Warszawa 2002.
  Google Scholar

GUAN D., HUBACEK K., 2008, A new integrated hydro-economic accounting and analytical Framework for water resources: A case study for North China, in: Journal of Environmental Management vol. 88, p. 1300-1313.
  Google Scholar

HARDING R., 2006, Ecologically sustainable development: origins, implementation and challenges, in: Desalination, vol. 187, p. 229-239.
  Google Scholar

HARRIS J.M., WISE T.A., GALLAGHER K.P., GOODWIN N.R, A Survey of Sustainable Development, Social and Economic Dimensions, Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London 2001.
  Google Scholar

HOEKSTRA, A.Y., CHAPAGAIN, A.K., ALDAYA, M.M. AND MEKONNEN, M.M., The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard, Earthscan, London, 2011.
  Google Scholar

HUANG J., ZHANG H.-L., TONG W.-J., CHEN F., 2012, The impact of local crops consumption on the water resources in Beijing, in: Journal of cleaner Production vol. 21, p. 45-50.
  Google Scholar

KESTEMONT B., FRENDO L., ZACCAI E., 2011, Indicators of the impacts of development on environment: A comparison for Africa and Europe, in: Ecological Indicators, vol. 11, p. 848-856.
  Google Scholar

KOEHLER A., 2008, Water use in LCA: managing the planet’s freshwater resources, in: International Journal Life Cycle Assessment vol. 13, p. 451-455.
  Google Scholar

KOZŁOWSKI S., Ekorozwój – wyzwanie XXI wieku, PWN, Warszawa 2000.
  Google Scholar

MARIOLAKOS I., 2007, Water resources management in the framework of sustainable development, in: Desalination, vol. 213, no. 1-3, p. 147–151.
  Google Scholar

MILÁ I CANALS L., CHENOWETH J., CHAPAGAIN A., ORR S., ANTON A., CLIFT R., 2009, Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA. Part I. Inventory modelling and characterisation fac-tors for the main impact pathways, in: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment vol. 14, p. 28-42.
  Google Scholar

OWENS J., 2001, Water resources in life-cycle impact assessment, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology vol. 5, p. 37-54.
  Google Scholar

PALME U., LUNDIN M., TILLMAN A.M., MOLANDER S., 2005, Sustainable development indicators for wastewater systems – researchers and indicator users in a co-operative case study, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 43, no. 3, p. 293-311.
  Google Scholar

PALME U., TILLMAN A.M., 2008, Sustainable development indicators: how are they used in Swedish water utilities, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 16, no. 13, p. 1346-1357.
  Google Scholar

PAWŁOWSKI A, 2010, The role of environmental engineering in introducing sustainable development, in: Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 264-278.
  Google Scholar

PAWŁOWSKI A., 2008, How Many Dimensions Does Sustainable Development Have?, in: Sustainable Development vol. 16 no 2, p. 81-90.
  Google Scholar

ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management. Life cycle assessment.
  Google Scholar

POSTEL S.L., DAILY G.C., ENRLICH P.R., 1995, Human appropriation of renewable fresh water, in: Science vol. 271, p. 785-788.
  Google Scholar

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 2010, Hydraulic Fracturing Research Study, EPA/600/F-10/002.
  Google Scholar

WCED (World Commission of Environment and Development), Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York 1987.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2014-01-02

Cited by

Widomski, M. K. (2014). Selected methods of water resources accounting in the aspect of sustainable development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 9(1), 141–150. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/4900

Authors

Marcin K. Widomski 

Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 40B, 20-618 Lublin Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 12
PDF downloads: 13