Social Sozophilosophy and the Care for Sutainability of Some Areas of the Social Reality
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015)
-
Contribution to the UN Post-2015 Development Agenda Based on the Concept of Resilience
Jürg Bloesch, Michael von Hauff, Klaus Mainzer, S. Venkata Mohan, Ortwin Renn, Verena Risse, Yonghui Song, Kazuhiko Takeuchi, Peter A. Wilderer7-13
-
Social Sozophilosophy and the Care for Sutainability of Some Areas of the Social Reality
Wiesław Sztumski15-29
-
Sustainable Development as a Single Measure: Case Study of Some Developing Asian Countries
Venkatesh G.31-42
-
Delinquency Hostile to Women – a Hurdle for Sustainable Development in Multidimensional Outlook
N. Gayathri, P. Karthikeyan43-50
-
Sustainable Development of Middle East Region
Wiktoria Sobczyk51-62
-
How We Think: How it Affects Sustainable Thinking
Eva Kras63-69
-
Evaluation of Sustainable Development in the Member States of the European Union
Barbara Bujanowicz-Haraś, Paweł Janulewicz, Anna Nowak, Artur Krukowski71-78
-
Beyond the North-South Debate: The Global Significance of Sustainable Development Debates in South Korea
Michael S. Pak78-86
-
Lost in Translation: Problems of Rendering the Term Sustainable Development into Non-Western Languages as Demonstrated in the Case of South Korea
Kwang-Hoon Baek, Nakil Ko87-93
-
A Curriculum on Sustainable Information Communication Technology
Barış Özkan, Alok Mishra95-101
-
The Holistic Concept of Sustainable Development in Strategies of Polish Voivodeships to the Year 2020
Agnieszka Makarewicz-Marcinkiewicz71-78
-
Furthering sustainable development: The implementation of Green Procurement in Central and Eastern Europe Methods and Experiences from Hungarian Public and Private Organizations
Orsolya Diófási-Kovács, László Valkó115-126
-
Distance Difficult to Overcome? Analysis of Norwegian and Polish Position on the Path to Sustainable Development
Artur Zimny, Karina Zawieja-Żurowska127-135
-
Sustainable Development of One of the Poorest Province of the European Union: Lublin Voivodeship, Poland – Attempt of Assessment
Marcin K. Widomski, Piotr Gleń, Grzegorz Łagód, Katarzyna M. Jaromin-Gleń137-149
-
Roshwald’s Philosophy of Care – the Creative Nature of the Concern (Implications for Sustainable Development)
Jakub Bartoszewski151-157
-
Integrating Role of Sustainable Development Paradigm in Shaping the Human-landscape Relation
Elżbieta Jolanta Bielińska, Barbara Futa, Stanisław Baran, Grażyna Żukowska, Małgorzata Pawłowska, Wojciech Cel, Tao Zhang159-168
-
The Measures of Sustainable Development – a Study Based on the European Monitoring of Energy-related Indicators
Agnieszka Żelazna, Justyna Gołębiowska167-177
Archives
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 2
2014-07-01 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 1
2014-01-02 19
-
Vol. 8 No. 2
2013-07-01 13
-
Vol. 8 No. 1
2013-01-02 12
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
In Anthropocene, the natural and social environment of human life has been degrading more significantly than ever before, especially for the past 70 years. The negative changes of the natural environment are well known and clearly felt. Therefore, the environmental awareness usually refers to the degradation of nature as a result of the human engineering activity. Due to their economic, political and ideological activities, people are aware of the degradation of social, cultural and spiritual environments to a much lesser extent. They distort the functioning of social systems and their sustainability, worsen the interpersonal relations, and devastate the personality. Hence, the issue of social environment protection, taken by sozology – complementary to the eco-philosophy – is crucial, as is the sozophilosophical reflection about it. The article presents threats to the sustainable development of selected fields of the social environment – knowledge, faith, social space, freedom, privacy, social time, and work – as well as their causes and possibilities of reduction.
Keywords:
References
BISSIO R., 2013, Eradicating Poverty ... By Lowering the Bar, in: Global Policy Forum, 19.06.
CLARKE R., 2006, What’s Privacy, http://www.rogerclarke.com/DV/Privacy.html (2.03.2015).
DIE biologische Uhr. Der Rhythmus unseres Lebens, in: Ego-Net 2001, No 4 (12.01.2015).
GAEBEL W., 2014, Macht (keine) Arbeit krank?, in: Der Demografiekongress 2014, http://www.forschung-fuer-unsere-gesundheit.demitmachen/fragen-zur-gesundheitsforschung/wissenschaftlerinnen-und-experten-nehmen-stellung/macht-keine-arbeit-krank.html (20.03.2015).
GLOTZ P., 2001, Die beschleunigte Gesellschaft (Kulturkämpfe im digitalen Kapitalismus), Frankfurt a/M., p. 47.
GROLL T., 2011, Nicht jeder Mensch ist für Arbeit geboren, in: Zeit-online. Wissen (21.06. 2011).
HEINBERG R., 2014, The Anthropocen: It's Not All About Us, in: Earth Island Journal, News of the World Environment, Summer 2014, Vol. 29, No 2.
KITTNER M., 2005, Arbeitskampf. Geschichte, Recht, Gegenwart, München.
MARX K., 1848, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts o 1848.
MORGENTHALER M., 2014, Es gibt keine strikte Trennung zwischen Arbeit und Frezeit, in: Tages Anzeiger, Zürich, 19.07.2014.
MÜLLER T., SCHMIDT T. M., 2011, Ich denke, also bin ich Ich? Das Selbst zwischen Neurobiologie, Philosophie und Religion, Verlag Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
NEES M., Stress verringert das Mitgefühl in: Spektrum der Wissenschaft – Psychologie/ Hirnfoschung, http://www.spektrum.de/news/stress-verringert-dasmitgefuehl/1327451 (16.01.2015).
PAULSEN R., 2014, Empty Labor. Idleness and Workplace Resistance, Cambridge Univ. Press.
PROSHANSKY H., ITTELSON W., RIVLIN L., 1970, Freedom of choice and behaviour in a physical setting, in: Environmental psychology: man and his physical setting, New York.
REUTTERER A., 2005, Die globale Verdummung. Springer, Wien.
SCHAAR P., 2009, Privatsphäre: Der Weg in die Überwachungsgesellschaft, Bertelsmann Verlag, Bielefeld.
SCHAUMANN Ph., REISER Ch., 2011, Die Bedrohung der Privatsphäre, http:/sicherheits kultur.at/privacy.htm (21.02.2015).
SCHELLENBERGER M., NORDHAUS T., 2009, The Death of Environmentalism. Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World, in: Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, No 1.
SMALLMAN C., 2014, The Progressive Modernization of Environmentalism, http://clivesmallman.org/2014/07/22/the-progressive-modernization-of-environmentalism (12.03. 2015).
SMITH B.D., ZEDER M.A., 2013, The onset of the Anthropocene, in: Anthropocene, Vol. 4, December.
SPORK P., 2014, Wake up! Aufbruch in eine ausgeschlafene Gesellschaft, München.
SZMYD J., 2004, Cywilizacja w zagrożeniu. Imperatywy i antynomie moralne, in: Filozofia wobec XXI wieku, ed. Gawor L.,, UMCS, Lublin, p. 14.
SZTUMSKI W., 2005, Bioethics in the face of technical perferctioning of man and his biological degradation, in: Biomedicine within the limits of human existence. Biomedical technology and practice reconsidered. Abstracts, Doorn, The Netherlands.
SZTUMSKI W., 2013, W sieci oszustwa, in: Sprawy Nauki, No 12.
SZTUMSKI W., 2009, Zniewolenie prawdy, in: Sprawy Nauki, No 1-2.
SZTUMSKI W., 2009, Praca – czynnik degenerujący, in: Sprawy Nauki, No 10.
SZTUMSKI W., 2010, Refleksja o cywilizacji zakłamania: ‘kłam, żeby być’, in: Transformacje, No 1-2.
SZTUMSKI W., 2008, Wiara i rozum czy wiara i kłamstwo? in: Sprawy Nauki, No 6-7.
SZTUMSKI W., 2014, Człowiek wobec środowiska. Propedeutyka sozofilozofii, WSL, Częstochowa.
WESTIN A., 1967, Privacy and Freedom, Ateneum, New York.
ZALASIEWICZ J., 2015, When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal, in: Quaternary International, 12.01.
ZEIBIG D., 2014, Schadet die Zeitumstellung wirklich der Gesundheit?, http://www.spektrum.de/ (23.10.2014).
Article Details
Abstract views: 48
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
