Sustainable Development as a Single Measure: Case Study of Some Developing Asian Countries
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2015)
-
Contribution to the UN Post-2015 Development Agenda Based on the Concept of Resilience
Jürg Bloesch, Michael von Hauff, Klaus Mainzer, S. Venkata Mohan, Ortwin Renn, Verena Risse, Yonghui Song, Kazuhiko Takeuchi, Peter A. Wilderer7-13
-
Social Sozophilosophy and the Care for Sutainability of Some Areas of the Social Reality
Wiesław Sztumski15-29
-
Sustainable Development as a Single Measure: Case Study of Some Developing Asian Countries
Venkatesh G.31-42
-
Delinquency Hostile to Women – a Hurdle for Sustainable Development in Multidimensional Outlook
N. Gayathri, P. Karthikeyan43-50
-
Sustainable Development of Middle East Region
Wiktoria Sobczyk51-62
-
How We Think: How it Affects Sustainable Thinking
Eva Kras63-69
-
Evaluation of Sustainable Development in the Member States of the European Union
Barbara Bujanowicz-Haraś, Paweł Janulewicz, Anna Nowak, Artur Krukowski71-78
-
Beyond the North-South Debate: The Global Significance of Sustainable Development Debates in South Korea
Michael S. Pak78-86
-
Lost in Translation: Problems of Rendering the Term Sustainable Development into Non-Western Languages as Demonstrated in the Case of South Korea
Kwang-Hoon Baek, Nakil Ko87-93
-
A Curriculum on Sustainable Information Communication Technology
Barış Özkan, Alok Mishra95-101
-
The Holistic Concept of Sustainable Development in Strategies of Polish Voivodeships to the Year 2020
Agnieszka Makarewicz-Marcinkiewicz71-78
-
Furthering sustainable development: The implementation of Green Procurement in Central and Eastern Europe Methods and Experiences from Hungarian Public and Private Organizations
Orsolya Diófási-Kovács, László Valkó115-126
-
Distance Difficult to Overcome? Analysis of Norwegian and Polish Position on the Path to Sustainable Development
Artur Zimny, Karina Zawieja-Żurowska127-135
-
Sustainable Development of One of the Poorest Province of the European Union: Lublin Voivodeship, Poland – Attempt of Assessment
Marcin K. Widomski, Piotr Gleń, Grzegorz Łagód, Katarzyna M. Jaromin-Gleń137-149
-
Roshwald’s Philosophy of Care – the Creative Nature of the Concern (Implications for Sustainable Development)
Jakub Bartoszewski151-157
-
Integrating Role of Sustainable Development Paradigm in Shaping the Human-landscape Relation
Elżbieta Jolanta Bielińska, Barbara Futa, Stanisław Baran, Grażyna Żukowska, Małgorzata Pawłowska, Wojciech Cel, Tao Zhang159-168
-
The Measures of Sustainable Development – a Study Based on the European Monitoring of Energy-related Indicators
Agnieszka Żelazna, Justyna Gołębiowska167-177
Archives
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 2
2014-07-01 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 1
2014-01-02 19
-
Vol. 8 No. 2
2013-07-01 13
-
Vol. 8 No. 1
2013-01-02 12
Main Article Content
Authors
venkatesh.govindarajan@ntnu.no
Abstract
The Rio Earth Summit of 1992 had emphasized on the development of suitable indicators for the measurement of sustainable development, as aids for decision-making at all levels. In this paper, the authors demonstrate how a Holistic National Sustainability Index can be constructed, by taking into consideration four dimensions of sustainability – Social, Economic, Environmental and Infrastructural. The methodology is applied to 12 developing Asian countries, where sustainable development is vital in the years to come. Comparison among countries using their respective Indices would be meaningless; it is not the states the countries are at a given point in time, but the paths which they follow over time, on the sustainability curve, which are comparable. Limitations and subjectivity notwithstanding, such an Index when used on its merit (with complete understanding of its deficiencies), can be a good planning tool for decision-makers at all levels of government.
Keywords:
References
CABRERA E., 2008, Benchmarking in the water industry: a mature practice? in: Water Utility Management International, vol. 3, no 3, p. 5-7.
CAMERON, R. & NEAL L., 2003, A concise economic history of the world, Oxford University Press, UK.
ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT (LONDON), 2009, European Green City Index – assessing the environmental impact of Europe’s greatest cities, Siemens AG, Munich.
EHRENFELD J., 2009, Understanding of complexity expands the reach of industrial ecology in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 13, no 2, p. 165-167.
EUROSTAT, 2007, Measuring progress towards a more sustainable Europe: 2007 monitoring report of the EU sustainable development strategy, Eurostat Statistical Books.
GUHA R., 1992, Prehistory of Indian Environmentalism – Intellectual Traditions in: Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 27, no I,3, p. 57-64.
HAJKOWICZ S. and COLLINS K., 2007, A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resources planning and management in: Water Resources Management, vol. 21, p. 1553-1566.
INDEXMUNDI, http://www.indexmundi.com, Accessed many times in October 2013.
IYER R R., 2010, Water – What must we do? Part of the book – Water: Culture, Politics and Management, Dorling Kinderseley (India) Private Limited, India, 2010.
KALLIO T. J., NORDBERG P. & AHONEN A., 2007, Rationalising Sustainable Development – a critical treatise in: Sustainable Development, vol. 15, p. 41-51.
KEIRSTEAD J. & LEACH M., 2008, Bridging the gaps between theory and practice: a service niche approach to urban sustainability indicators in: Sustainable Development, vol. 16, p. 329-340.
MITCHELL G., 1996, Problems and fundamentals of sustainable development indicators in: Sustainable Development, vol. 4, p.1-11.
PAWLOWSKI A., 2008, How many dimensions does sustainable development have in: Sustainable Development, vol. 16, p. 81-90.
QUENTAL N., LOURENCO J. M. & DA SILVA F. N., 2011, Sustainable development policy: goals, targets and political cycles in: Sustainable Development, vol. 19, no 1, p. 15-29.
SAVE THE CHILDREN, 2013, State of the World’s Mothers 2013 in: http://www.savethechildrenweb.org/SOWM-2013/#/1/zoomed (8.05.2013).
SINGHIRUNNUSORN W & STENSTROM M K., 2009, Appropriate wastewater treatment systems for developing countries: criteria and indicator assessment in Thailand in: Water Science and Technology, vol. 59, no. 9, p. 1873-1884.
THE ECONOMIST, 2013A, Poverty: The Decathlon Deprivation, The Economist Newspaper Limited, UK, March 23-29.
THE ECONOMIST, 2013B, Infrastructure – The road to hell: Grounded – Special report on Brazil, The Economist Newspaper Limited, UK, September.
THE ECONOMIST, 2013C. India’s informal economy – Hidden value, The Economist Newspaper Limited, UK, September.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2011, Human Development Report 2011 – Sustainable and Equity: A better future for all, http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2011_EN_Complete.pdf (31.03.2013).
VENKATESH G., 2011, Global Logistics Hubs in: Logistics Insight Asia, Contineo Media, Singapore, April-May, p. 8-15,
VENKATESH G., 2012, A critique of the European Green City Index in: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 57, no 3, p. 317-328.
VENKATESH G and BRATTEBO H., 2013, Typifying cities to streamline the selection of relevant environmental sustainability indicators for urban water supply and sewage handling systems, in: Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 15, p. 765-782.
Article Details
Abstract views: 86
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
