Categorical Imperative in Defense of Strong Sustainability
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 11 No. 2 (2016)
-
Eco-aesthetics and Ecological Aesthetics of Nature
Włodzimierz Tyburski7-12
-
Impact of the Environmental Factor on the Dynamics of Development of Neighbor Law in the Context of Issues of Sustainable Development
Aleksey Anisimov, Irina Emelkina, Anatoliy Ryzhenkov13-22
-
Environmental Ethics as Ethics of the Political State
Andrzej Papuziński23-28
-
Categorical Imperative in Defense of Strong Sustainability
Pankojini Mulia, Ajit Kumar Behura, Sarita Kar29-36
-
Orchards on Eroded Uplands of Southeast China: Sustainability or Abandonment?
Chengchao Wang, Yusheng Yang, Wen Pang, Jing Hong37-43
-
Contemporary Concepts of a City in the Context of Sustainable Development: Perspective of Humanities and Natural Sciences
Marcin Leźnicki, Aleksandra Lewandowska45-54
-
The Judaeo-Christian Tradition as a Source of a Paradigm of Sustainable Development
Małgorzata Pink55-66
-
Agriculture vs. Alleviating the Climate Change
Grażyna Żukowska, Magdalena Myszura, Stanisław Baran, Sylwia Wesołowska, Małgorzata Pawłowska, Łukasz Dobrowolski67-74
-
Barriers in the Advancement of Solar Energy in Developing Countries like India
Suprava Chakraborty, Pradip Kumar Sadhu, Utpal Goswami75-80
-
Farm Education as a Component of Sustainable Development in Selected Countries of the European Union
Magdalena Kowalska, Wioletta Knapik, Małgorzata Bogusz81-88
-
Evaluation of Automobile Manufacturing Enterprise Competitiveness from Social Responsibility Perspective
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu89-98
-
The Impact of Public Environmental Protection Expenditure on Economic Growth
Piotr Krajewski99-104
-
Impoverishment – The Threat for Sustainable Developments in Developing Countries
Velusamy Ravikumar, S. Chandrakumarmangalam105-111
-
Sustainable Urban Drainage Infrastructure
Maciej Mrowiec113-118
-
Scientific Communique: Global Warming and the Irrelevance of Science
Richard S. Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan119-125
-
Scientific Communique: Mitigation of Greenhouse Effect by Reduction of the Methane Emissions
Justyna Kujawska, Wojciech Cel127-129
-
Scientific Communique: Ten Years of Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development
Leszek Gawor131-133
Archives
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 2
2014-07-01 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 1
2014-01-02 19
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
Strong sustainability defends that certain forms of natural capital (environment) are critical and therefore, non-substitutable. There is an increasing concern for conserving the natural environment due to its unique contribution for sustenance and wellbeing of all living beings. The development process which does not preserve its natural capital is bound to lead towards an unsustainable growth path. In the wake of strong sustainability, it is an imperative to preserve the natural environment as it is degrading beyond its threshold limit. The ethical aspect of strong sustainability raises the ethical question what is right thing to do and emphasizes on ethical relations of humans with natural environment. The paper defends strong sustainability from Kant’s Categorical Imperative. Categorical Imperative motivates every human to act out of duty. Actions done for the sake of duty alone are morally worthy. A duty is the relationship between one’s moral action and his autonomy of the will. Concerning the sustenance and wellbeing of the present and the future generation, it is the moral duty of the humans to preserve the natural environment.
Keywords:
References
ADAMS W. M., 2006, The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking Environment and Development in the Twenty-first Century, in: The IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meetings, p. 29-31.
BECKERMAN W., 1995, How Would You Like your Sustainability Sir? Weak or Strong? A reply to my Critics, in: Environmental Values, vol. 4, p. 169-179.
BRAND F., 2009, Critical Natural Capital Revisited: Ecological Resilience and Sustainable Development, in: Ecological Economic, vol. 68, p. 605-612.
DALY H.E., 2005, Economics in Full World, in: Scientific American, vol. 3, p. 100-107.
DEAN R., 2006, The Value of Humanity in Kant’s Moral Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
DIETZ S., NEUMAYER E., 2007, Weak and Strong Sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and Measurement, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 61, p. 617-626.
EKINS P., 2011, Environmental Sustainability: From Environmental Valuation to the Sustainability Gap, Progress in: Physical Geography, vol. 35, no 5, p. 629-651.
EKINS P., SIMON S., DEUTSCH L., FOLKE C., DE GROOT R., 2003, A Framework for the Practical Application of the Concepts Critical Natural Capital and Strong Sustainability, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 44, p. 165-185.
ELKINGTON J., 1997, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Lines of 21st Century Business, Capstone Publishing, Oxford.
GILLROY M. J., 1998, Kant’s Conservationism’ in his paper ‘Kantian Ethics and Environmental Policy Argument: Autonomy, Ecosystem Integrity, and our Duties to Nature, in: Ethics and Environment, vol. 3, no 2, p.131-155
HARTMAN L.P., CHATTERJEE A., 2007, Perspectives on Business Ethics, Tata McGraw Hill Education Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
HARTWICK J.M., 1977, Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources, in: The American Economic Review, vol. 67, no 5, p. 972-974.
HEDIGER W., 1999, Reconciling Weak and Strong Sustainability, in: International Journal of Social Economics, vol. 26 no 7/8/9, p. 1120-1144.
JAMIESON D., 1998, Sustainability and beyond, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 24, p. 183-192.
JAIN P., JAIN P., 2013, Sustainability Assessment Index: A Strong Sustainability Approach to Measure Sustainable Human Development, in: International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, vol. 20, no 2, p. 116-122.
JICKLING B., SAUVE L., BRIERE L., NIBLETT B., ROOT E., 2009, The 5th World Environmental Education Congress, 2009: A Research Project, in: Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 15, p. 47-67.
KANT I., 1785, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, (ed. & trans. Gregor M. J.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
KANT I., 1788, Critique of Practical Reason, (ed. & trans. Gregor M. J.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
KANT I., 1797, The Metaphysics of Morals, (ed. & trans. Gregor M. J.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
MATVICYCHUK A., 2014, Ecological Deontology in the Context of Solving the Task of Ecologization of Modern Man Thinking, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 9, no 1, p. 151-156.
MEDHURST J., EKINS P., 2006, The European Structural Funds and Sustainable Development: A Methodology and Indicator Framework for Evaluation, in: Evaluation, vol. 12, no 4, p. 474-495.
NEUMAYER E., 2012, Human Development and Sustainability, in: Journal of Human Development Capabilities, vol. 13, no 4, p. 561-579.
PEET J., Strong Sustainability for New Zealand: Principles and Scenario, SANZ (Phase-2) Report, Nakedize Ltd., New Zealand 2009.
PELENC J., BALLET J., 2015, Strong Sustainability, Critical Natural Capital and the Capability Approach, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 112, p. 36-44.
SOLOW R.M., 1974, Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources, in: Review of economic studies: symposium of the economics of exhaustible resources, p. 29-46.
STOCKHOLM CONFERENCE, 1972, Declaration of United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Sweden, Stockholm.
TRUEMAN H.S., 1951, Annual Message to the Congress: the President’s Economic Report, The American Presidency Project, Online by G. Peters & J.T.Woolley, http://www.presidency. ucsb.edu (11.09.2015).
UNCED, 1992, Agenda 21, Conches, UNCED Secretariat, Switzerland, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (27.11.2015).
Article Details
Abstract views: 89
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
