The Impact of Public Environmental Protection Expenditure on Economic Growth
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 11 No. 2 (2016)
-
Eco-aesthetics and Ecological Aesthetics of Nature
Włodzimierz Tyburski7-12
-
Impact of the Environmental Factor on the Dynamics of Development of Neighbor Law in the Context of Issues of Sustainable Development
Aleksey Anisimov, Irina Emelkina, Anatoliy Ryzhenkov13-22
-
Environmental Ethics as Ethics of the Political State
Andrzej Papuziński23-28
-
Categorical Imperative in Defense of Strong Sustainability
Pankojini Mulia, Ajit Kumar Behura, Sarita Kar29-36
-
Orchards on Eroded Uplands of Southeast China: Sustainability or Abandonment?
Chengchao Wang, Yusheng Yang, Wen Pang, Jing Hong37-43
-
Contemporary Concepts of a City in the Context of Sustainable Development: Perspective of Humanities and Natural Sciences
Marcin Leźnicki, Aleksandra Lewandowska45-54
-
The Judaeo-Christian Tradition as a Source of a Paradigm of Sustainable Development
Małgorzata Pink55-66
-
Agriculture vs. Alleviating the Climate Change
Grażyna Żukowska, Magdalena Myszura, Stanisław Baran, Sylwia Wesołowska, Małgorzata Pawłowska, Łukasz Dobrowolski67-74
-
Barriers in the Advancement of Solar Energy in Developing Countries like India
Suprava Chakraborty, Pradip Kumar Sadhu, Utpal Goswami75-80
-
Farm Education as a Component of Sustainable Development in Selected Countries of the European Union
Magdalena Kowalska, Wioletta Knapik, Małgorzata Bogusz81-88
-
Evaluation of Automobile Manufacturing Enterprise Competitiveness from Social Responsibility Perspective
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu89-98
-
The Impact of Public Environmental Protection Expenditure on Economic Growth
Piotr Krajewski99-104
-
Impoverishment – The Threat for Sustainable Developments in Developing Countries
Velusamy Ravikumar, S. Chandrakumarmangalam105-111
-
Sustainable Urban Drainage Infrastructure
Maciej Mrowiec113-118
-
Scientific Communique: Global Warming and the Irrelevance of Science
Richard S. Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan119-125
-
Scientific Communique: Mitigation of Greenhouse Effect by Reduction of the Methane Emissions
Justyna Kujawska, Wojciech Cel127-129
-
Scientific Communique: Ten Years of Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development
Leszek Gawor131-133
Archives
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 2
2014-07-01 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 1
2014-01-02 19
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The article analyzes the impact of public environmental protection expenditure on economic growth. Estimating the strength of this relationship is of particular importance in the context of the recent global economic crisis. The paper is organized as follows. Firstly, theoretical model showing the mechanism of public environmental protection expenditure impact on GDP is presented. Then the results of an empirical study are shown. The study is conducted for the eleven countries of Central Europe. Econometric panel model is applied, which takes into account both time and cross-sectional dimension of the analyzed phenomenon, because, as indicated in the article, relying only on the variation over time may lead to misleading conclusions. The estimations based on panel model, conducted for the years 2001-2012, shows that the increase in public environmental protection expenditure has a positive effect on economic growth. Due to the fact that the analyzed period is heterogeneous, that is it covers both the period before the global economic crisis, and during its lifetime, calculations were also performed for two sub-periods. Results reveal that public environmental protection expenditure has stronger influence on GDP during crisis. Hence, the study shows that public environmental protection expenditure have no negative impact on economic growth, and its positive effects are strongest in case of economies affected by the global financial crisis.
Keywords:
References
AMANO R.A., WIRJANTO T.S., 1997, Intertemporal Substitution and Government Spending, in: The Review of Economics and Statistics, no. 1, p. 605-609.
ASCHAUER D., 1988, The Equilibrium Approach to Fiscal Policy, in: Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 20, no 1, p. 41-62.
AUERBACH A. J., GORODNICHENKO Y., 2012, Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy, in: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 1-27.
BARRO R., 1981, Output Effects of Government Purchases, in: Journal of Political Economy, vol. 89, no. 6, p. 1086-1121.
BAUM A., KOESTER G.B., 2011, The Impact of Fiscal Policy on Economic Activity over The Business Cycle – Evidence From a Threshold VAR Analysis, in: Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper Series, no. 3.
BLANCHARD O., LEIGH D., 2013, Growth Forecast Errors and Fiscal Multipliers, in: IMF Working Paper, no. 1.
CHRISTIANO L.J., EICHENBAUM M., 1992, Current Real Business Cycle Theory and Aggregate Labor Market Fluctuations, in: American Economic Review, vol. 82, no. 3, p. 430-50.
DEJONG D.N., DAVE Ch., 2007, Structural Macroeconometrics, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2007.
EGGERTSSON G. B., 2011, What Fiscal Policy is Effective at Zero Interest Rates?, in; NBER Macroeconomics Annual, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2011.
GRAY W., SHADBEGIAN R., 1995 Pollution abatement costs, regulation and plant-level productivity’, in: NBER Working Paper, no. 4994.
IM K., PESARAN M. , SHIN Y., 2003, Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels, in: Journal of Econometrics, vol. 115, no. 1, p. 53-74.
ISMAIL N.A., 2010, Does government spending crowd out private consumption in Malaysia, in: Jurnal Kemanusiaan, no. 16.
JOSHI J., KRISHNAN R., LAVE L., 2000, Estimating the hidden costs of environmental regulation, in: The Accounting Review, vol. 76.
KOSSECKI P., WACHOWICZ J., 2013, Economic Crisis, Trust and Socio-Economic Aspects of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 65-71.
KRAJEWSKI P., 2014, Comparison of Nominal and Real Rigidities. Fiscal Policy Perspective, in: Comparative Economic Research, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 61-76.
LIETAER B., C. AMSPERGER, S. GOEMER, S. BRUNNHUBER, 2012, Money and Sustainability: the Missing Link, A Report from the Club of Rome to Finance Watch and the World Business Academy, Triarchy Press, Devon.
LINNEMANN L., A. SCHABERT, 2005, Productive Government Expenditure in Monetary Business Cycle Models, in: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, no. 53.
MORGENSTERN R., W. PIZER W., SHIH J.S., 1997, Are we overstating the real economic costs of environmental protection?, in: Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, no. 97.
PEARCE D., PALMER Ch., 2001, Public and private spending for environmental protection: a cross-country policy analysis, in: Fiscal studies, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 403-456.
TURNOVSKY S. J., 2000, Methods of Macroeconomic Dynamics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Press, Cambridge.
WOOLDRIDGE J. M., 2010, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Press, Cambridge.
Article Details
Abstract views: 60
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
