Comparative Evaluation of Experience in Environmental Tax Reforms in Chosen EU States
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 11 No. 1 (2016)
-
Education and the Problems of Sustainable Development
Delyse Springett7-14
-
Ecophilosophy in Modern East Asia: The Case of Hansalim in South Korea
Michael S. Pak, Jeehyun Kim15-22
-
The Concept of Nobilis Barbarus in the Light of Contemporary Ecological Challenges
Ryszard F. Sadowski23-30
-
Discourses of Ecology and the Sketches of Creative Ecology in the Context of Sustainable Development
Tomas Kačerauskas31-39
-
The Impact of Sustainable Development on the Homeostasis of the Social Environment and the Matter of Survival
Wiesław Sztumski41-47
-
The Anthropocentric Sozology of Julian Aleksandrowicz
Leszek Gawor49-58
-
Tax Payment, Social Contribution for Pollution Prevention and Happiness
Jing Xu, Jianjun Li59-64
-
Changes in Environmental Attitudes in Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe
Paweł Rydzewski65-72
-
Designing a Mixed Evaluating System for Green Manufacturing of Automotive Industry
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Rui Wang, Yongjiang Shi73-86
-
Comparative Evaluation of Experience in Environmental Tax Reforms in Chosen EU States
Astrida Miceikiene, Valdemaras Makutenas, Jan Zukovskis, Artur J. Kożuch87-99
-
Cultural Ecosystem Services – Framework, Theories and Practices
Anna Dłużewska101-110
-
Joseph Kozielecki’s Project of Temporal Transgression and the Philosophy of Sustainable Development
Marek Tański111-116
-
Sustainable Development in the World from the Aspect of Environmental Health and Human Development Index: Regional Variations and Patterns
Slavomir Bucher117-124
-
Rebuilding the Pillars of Sustainable Society Index: a Multivariate Post Hoc I-distance Approach
Dejan Savić, Veljko Jeremić, Nataša Petrović125-134
-
Agricultural Biodiversity for Sustainable Development
Piotr Krajewski135-141
-
Factory Farming Versus Environment and Society. The Analysis of Selected Problems
Ignacy S. Fiut, Marcin Urbaniak143-156
-
Urbanization, Food Insecurity and Agriculture – Challenges for Social Sustainable Development
Karthika Palanisamy, Karthikeyan Parthasarathy157-162
-
Ecological Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development
Elena Mieszajkina163-171
-
Sustainable Mitigation of Greenhouse Gases Emissions
Wojciech Cel, Aneta Czechowska-Kosacka, Tao Zhang173-176
-
Sustainable Development versus Prospecting and Extraction of Shale Gas
Aneta Duda, Justyna Gołębiowska, Agnieszka Żelazna177-180
Archives
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 2
2014-07-01 16
-
Vol. 9 No. 1
2014-01-02 19
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The research presents the analysis and comparison of environmental tax reforms in the countries of the European Union, which are an effect of political decisions. The main focus in evaluation of environmental tax reforms is put on the results of improvement of environmental quality and maintenance of revenue neutrality that may be used to determine the appropriateness and benefit of the reform in the countries. The following countries which have implemented the environmental tax reforms have been chosen for the empirical study: Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Criteria of evaluation of environmental tax reforms have been determined, namely, the effect of environmental taxes on state revenue; economic-social effects of environmental taxes; the effect of environmental taxes on reduction of environmental pollution. The empirical quantitative and qualitative study has been conducted for analysis of the dynamics of the quantitative indicators by looking at their variation trends, determining the values of qualitative indicators and significance of quantitative and qualitative indicators, and applying the correlation analysis. The results of the study have suggested that the countries which have implemented the environmental tax reforms have achieved environmental, economic, and social aims. Environmental (energy intensity, GHG emissions productivity), economic-social (the share of environmental taxes in state revenue, labour productivity) indicators of the countries have improved during the analyzed period. The environmental tax reforms have not put any significant burden of taxation on the society, while some of the countries (the United Kingdom, the Netherlands) have even achieved the neutrality of state revenue.
Keywords:
References
ALBRECHT J., 2006, Green Tax Reforms for Industrial Transformation: Overcoming Institutional Inertia with Consumption Taxes, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 14, issue 5, p. 300-311.
ANDERSEN M., EKINS P., 2010, Carbon – Energy Taxation: Lessons from Europe, http://napa.vn:8080/uris/uploads/1/Oxford.Carbon.Energy.Taxation.Jan.2010.eBook (5.03.2015).
BARDE J. P., 2004, Green Tax Reforms in OECD Countries: An Overview. Comisión Económica para America Latina y el Caribe, http://www.eclac.org/dmaah/noticias/discursos/3/14283/03_en.pdf (8.03.2015).
BOSQUET B., 2000, Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 34, issue 1, p. 19-32.
BOVENBERG L., VAN DER PLOEG F., 1998, Tax Reform, Structural Unemployment and the Environment, in: Scandinawian Jouranal of Economics, vol. 100, issue 1, p. 593-610.
CIASCHINI M., PRETAROLI R., SEVERINI F., 2013, Regional double dividend from environmental tax reform: An application for the Italian economy, in: Research in Economics, vol. 66, issue 3, p. 273-283.
CONRAD K, LOSCHEL A., 2005, Recycling of eco-taxes, labor market effects and the true cost of labor – a CGE analysis, in: Journal of Applied Economics, vol. VIII, no 2, p. 259-278.
EKINS P., 2011, The Price Mechanism and Eco-efficiency The Role of Green Fiscal Reform, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 15, issue 5, p. 663-666.
FERNANDEZ E. PEREZ R. RUIZ J., 2011, Optimal green tax reforms yielding double dividend, in: Energy Policy, vol. 39, issue 7, p. 4253-4263.
FOUQUET D., JOHANSSON TH., 2003, Energy and Environmental Tax Models from Europe and Their Link to Other Instruments for Sustainability: Police Evaluation and Dynamics of Regional Integration, Energy Foundation China, http://www.efchina.org/Attachments/Report/reports-efchina-20060414-2-en/3._Doerte_Fouquet_Thomas_Johansson_European_Energy_Tax_Models.pdf (8.08.2015).
FRASER I., WASCHIK R., 2013, The Double Dividend Hypothesis in a CGE Model: Specific Factors and the Carbon Base, in: Energy Economics, vol. 39, p. 283-295.
FULLLERTON D., LEICESTER A., SMITH S., 2010, Environmental taxes, in: Selected Works Don Fullerton, http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context= don_fullerton (7.03.2015).
KOSONEN K., NICODEME G., 2009, The role of fiscal instruments in environmental policy, European Commision, http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/economic_analysis/tax_papers/taxation _paper_19.pdf (5.03.2015).
MIGUEL C., MANZANO B., 2011, Gradual green tax reforms, in: Energy Economics, vol. 33, Suplement 1, p. S50-S58.
MUSU I., 2010, Green Economy: great expectation or big illusion?, Ca’Foscari University of Venice, http://www.unive.it/media/allegato/DIP/Economia/Working_papers/Working_papers_2010/WP_DSE_musu_01_10.pdf (7.03.2015).
PARRY I., 2012, Reforming the tax system to promote environmental objectives: An application to Mauritius, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 77, p. 103-117.
PATUELLI R., NIJKAMP P., PELS E., 2005, Environmental tax reform and the double dividend: A meta-analytical performance assessment, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 55, issue 4, p. 564-583.
PAWŁOWSKI A., 2008, How many dimensions does sustainable development have?, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 16, No 2, p. 81-90.
PEDERSEN L., 2005, The Political Impact of Environmental Economic Ideas, in: Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 28, issue 1, p. 25-46.
STAMATOVA S., STEURER A., 2011, In 2009, EU-27 environmental tax revenue rose to 2.4 % of GDP, Eurostat, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-11-067/EN/KS-SF-11-067-EN.PDF (7.03.2015).
OECD, 2004, Tax Administration in OECD Countries: Comparative Information Series, http://www.oecd.org/ctp/administration/CIS-2004.pdf (5.03.2015).
VLASSENKO I., 2001, Evaluation of the efficiency and fairness of British, French and Swedish property tax systems, in: Property Management, vol. 19, No 5, p. 384-416.
Article Details
Abstract views: 83
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
