Decomposition Analysis of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the European Union
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 12 No. 2 (2017)
-
Troublesome Evaluation of Technological Innovations. Balancing Between a Blessing and a Bane of the Technological Progress
Wiesław Sztumski7-13
-
Multi-criteria Evaluation of the Eco-innovation Level in the European Union Countries
Andrzej Kobryń, Joanna Prystrom15-26
-
Decomposition Analysis of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the European Union
Magdaléna Drastichová27-35
-
Call for Integral Protection of Biocultural Diversity
Ryszard F. Sadowski37-45
-
Modern Issues of Development of the System of Specially Protected Natural Areas in the Context of the Concept of Sustainable Development
Aleksey Anisimov, Kermen Lidzheeva, Anatoliy Ryzhenkov47-57
-
Sustainability, Corporate Community Engagement and Enterprise Development – Lessons from a Case Study in Emu-Ebendo Niger-Delta, Nigeria
O.E. Ajide, P.A. Strachan, A. Russell, D.R. Jones59-68
-
Corporate Environmental Responsibility for a Sustainable Future
Pankojini Mulia, Ajit Kumar Behura, Sarita Kar69-77
-
Environmental Impact of Application on the Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility in Selected EU Countries
Jana Hroncová Vicianová, Štefan Hronec79-88
-
Wellbeing versus Sustainable Development – Conceptual Framework and Application Challenges
Anna Dłużewska89-97
-
Understanding Farmers’ Adoption Decisions for New Cash Crops: Evidence from Xishuangbanna in Tropical China
Le Zhang, Yasuyuki Kono, Xiaobo Hua, Lin Zheng, Rui Zhou99-108
-
Development Aid as a Gift of Love: Re-inventing Aid on a Spiritual Foundation
Rohana Ulluwishewa109-118
-
Where Science Fails, Outdated Religion Provides Clues
Venkatesh G.119-122
-
The Shaping of Sustainable Landscape in the Context of the European Landscape Convention and the Encyclical Laudato Si’
Sebastian Bernat, Małgorzata Flaga, Wioletta Kałamucka123-131
-
Sustainable Development in the Russian Federation – Indicator-based Approach
Bartosz Bartniczak, Andrzej Raszkowski133-142
-
Twenty-five Years of Independent Ukraine: Is there a Way to Sustainable Healthy Development?
Viktoriya Pantyley, Roman Lozynskyy, Roman Slyvka143-160
-
Youth Attitudes Towards Goals of a New Sustainable Development Agenda
Tatjana Borojević, Matjaž Maletič, Nataša Petrović, Jelena Andreja Radaković, Marjan Senegačnik, Damjan Maletič161-172
-
Utilitarian Technological Solutions to Reduce CO2 Emission in the Aspect of Sustainable Development
Tomasz P. Olejnik, Elżbieta Sobiecka173-179
-
Environmental Risks Related to the Recovery and Recycling Processes of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)
Agnieszka Generowicz, Ryszarda Iwanejko181-192
Archives
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
Climate change is a significant threat to sustainable development (SD). Using the Log-Mean Divisia Index Method (LMDI) a decomposition of the data on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the European Union (EU) in 2000 -2013 is carried out. To detect if decoupling of the environmental variable represented by the GHG emissions from the economic variable represented by the GDP was taking place in the EU economy, the changes of the GHG emissions were divided into three effects. These factors include the economic activity (scale), the composition or structure of the EU economy with respect to the countries, and GHG intensity of the countries. The aim of the paper is to detect if decoupling of the GHG emissions from the GDP development in the EU took place and to detect the factors of this development. The intensity effect was mainly responsible for the reduction of the GHG emissions in the EU while the scale effect contributed to their increase. The role of the composition effect was only marginal; however, it was positive. As the intensity effect often showed the high negative values, the total effect was often negative as well, which means that decoupling of GHG emissions from GDP took place.
JEL Classification: Q51, Q54, Q56, F64
Keywords:
References
ANG B. W., 2004, Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method?, in: Energy Policy, vol. 32, no 9, p.1131-1139.
ANG B.W., CHOI K. H., 1997, Decomposition of Aggregate Energy and Gas Emission Intensities for Industry: A Refined Divisia Index Method, in: Energy Journal, vol.18, no 3, p.59-73.
ANG B. W., ZHANG, F. Q., 2000, Survey of Index Decomposition Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies, in: Energy, vol. 25, no 12, p. 1149-1176.
ANG B.W., ZHANG F. Q., 1999, Inter-regional Comparisons of Energy-related CO2 Emissions using the Decomposition Technique, in: Energy, vol. 24, no 4, p. 297-305.
BRŮHA, J., ŠČASNÝ, M., 2006, Economic Analysis of Driving Forces of Environmental Burden during the Transition Process: EKC hypothesis testing in the Czech Republic. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Congress of Association of Environmental and Resource Economics (AERE), Kyoto, 4-7 July, 2006.
DALY H. E., 1996, Beyond Growth: he Economics of Sustainable Development, Beacon Press, Boston.
DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2014, Monitoring Sustainable Development and Decoupling in the EU, in: Ekonomická revue - Central European Review of Economic Issues, vol. 17, no 3, p.125‒140.
EU, 2012, Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C 326/132.
EUROSTAT, 2016a, Data. Database. Economy and Finance, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (10.12.2016).
EUROSTAT, 2016b, Sustainable development indicators. Indicators, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/sdi/indicators (10.12.2016).
EUROSTAT, 2016c, Sustainable development indicators. Indicators. Climate change and energy, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/sdi/indicators/climate-change-and-energy (15.12.2016).
EUROSTAT, 2014,. Eurostat Metadata. Annual National Accounts (nama_10) http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/nama_10_esms.htm (16.12.2016).
FEEM, 2011, Sustainability Index. Methodological Report http://www.feemsi.org/documents/methodological_report2011.pdf (10.12.2016).
HEDIGER W., 2006. Weak and Strong Sustainability, Environmental Conservation and Economic Growth, in: Natural Resource Modeling, vol. 19, no 3, pp. 359-394.
CHERP A., KOPTEVA I., MNATSAKANIAN R., 2003, Economic transition and environmental sustainability: effects of economic restructuring on air pollution in the Russian Federation, in: Journal of Environ-mental Management, vol. 68, no 2, p.141-151.
IPCC, 2014, Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, p. 1-32.
OECD, 2002, Sustainable Development. Indi-cators to measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth. [SG/SD (2002) 1/FINAL.], OECD, Paris.
OECD, 2003, OECD Environmental Indicators. Development, Measurement and Use [Refe-rence Paper], OECD, Paris.
PROOPS J. L. R., FABER M., WAGENHALS G., 1993. Reducing CO2 Emissions: a Comparative Input-Output Study for Germany and the UK. Springer, Berlin.
CHUNG H. S., 1998, Industrial Structure and Source of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in East Asia: Estimation and Comparison, in: Energy and Environment, vol. 9 no 5, p. 509-533.
SEIBEL S., 2003, Decomposition analysis of carbon dioxide-emission changes in Germany - Conceptual framework and empirical results. European Communities, Luxembourg.
TSUCHIMOTO F., ŠČASNÝ M., 2011, Decomposition Analysis of Air Pollutant in the Czech Republic. Paper submitted to 18th Annual Conference of the European association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE), Roma 29 June – 2 July 2011.
UNFCCC, 2015, Kyoto Protocol, UN.
VEHMAS J., LUUKKANEN J., PIHLAJAMÄKI M., 2008, Decomposition Analysis of EU Sustainable Development Indicators. Final Report of the DECOIN project (Development and Comparison of Sustainability Indicators), Deliverable D3.1 of WP3, Turku School of Economics, Finland Futures Research Centre, Turku.
VIGUIER L. 1999, Emissions of SO2, NOx and CO2 in Transition Economies: Emission Inventories and Divisia index Analysis, in: Energy Journal, vol. 20, no 2, p.59-87.
WCED, 1987, Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
XU X. Y., ANG B. W., 2013, Index Decomposition Analysis applied to CO2 Emission Studies, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 93, p.313-329.
Article Details
Abstract views: 65
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
