Equality of Resources, Ethical Principles and Sustainable Development

Mayavee Singh


Department of Philosophy, Goa University, Goa, (Former Institution) India (India)


Abstract

A harmony between human being and natural resources are significant, but exploitation of the natural resources are not respectable in numerous sense. My main contention in this paper is that in order to save the natural resources for future generations there should be a state policy for equal distribution of natural resources, so that we can accomplish the need of the present generation and at the same time preserve the resources for future generations. This paper is an attempt to apply the Ronald Dworkin’s ethical philosophy of ambition-sensitive and endowmen-insensitive notion of distributional equality on sustainable development.


Keywords:

Dworkin, sustainable development, resources, equality, state

ARNESON R., 2008, Rawls, Responsibility, and Distributive justice, in: Justice Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Themes from Harasanyi and Rawls, eds. Fleurbaey M., Salles M., Weymark J.A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 80-107.
  Google Scholar

BAKER S., 2006, Sustainable Development, Routlege, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
  Google Scholar

BROWN A., 2009, Ronald Dworkin’s Theory of Equality-Domestic and Global perspectives, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  Google Scholar

CASAL P., WILLIAMS A., 2004, Equality of Resources and Procreative Justice, ed. By Justine Burley in: Dworkin and His Critics with replies by Dworkin, Blackwell Publishing, USA.
  Google Scholar

DWORKIN R., 1977, Taking Rights Seriously, Duckworth, London.
  Google Scholar

DWORKIN R. 2000, Soverein Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

DWORKIN R., 2011, Justice for Hedgehogs, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

ERIC K., AIKINS W., 2014, The relationship between sustainable development and resource use from a geographic perspective, in: A United Nations sustainable development journal, Vol. 38 (4), p. 261-269.
  Google Scholar

FERREIRA F.H., PERAGINE V., Equality of opportunity: Theory and Evidence, http://ftp.iza.org/dp8994.pdf (23.12.2017).
  Google Scholar

HOBBES T., 1991, Leviathan, ed. Tuck R., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

LOCKE J., 1988, Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett P., rev. ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

PRAKASH G., 2018, Buddhist Attitude towards Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, Vol. 13, no 1, p. 217-220.
  Google Scholar

RAWLS J., 1971, A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  Google Scholar

ROUSSEAU J.J., 1973, The Social Contract and Discourses, trans, and ed. Cole, G.D.H., Dent publications, London.
  Google Scholar

STRANGE T., BAYLEY A. 2008, Sustainable Development: Linking economy, society, environment, OECD Publications.
  Google Scholar

VALLENTYNE P., 2002, Brute Luck, Option Luck, and Equality of Initial opportunities, in: Ethics, Vol. 112, No. 3 (April), The University of Chicago Press, p. 529-557.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2018-07-02

Cited by

Singh, M. (2018). Equality of Resources, Ethical Principles and Sustainable Development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 13(2), 185–190. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/5027

Authors

Mayavee Singh 

Department of Philosophy, Goa University, Goa, (Former Institution) India India

Statistics

Abstract views: 22
PDF downloads: 11