The Tradeoff between Growth and Environment: Evidence from China and the United States
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018)
-
The Enlightenment Assumptions of the Brundtland Report
Andrzej Papuziński7-14
-
The Tradeoff between Growth and Environment: Evidence from China and the United States
Jing Xu, Jianjun Li15-20
-
Attaining the Energy Sustainability: Analysis of the Ecuadorian Strategy
Juan Lata-García, Christopher Reyes-Lopez, Francisco Jurado21-29
-
Sovereign Wealth Funds as a Tool to Invest in Renewable Energy in Africa
Olga Rataj31-39
-
Problems in the Accomplishment of Solar and Wind Energy in India
Himanshu Sharma, Pankaj Kumar, Nitai Pal, Pradip Kumar Sadhu41-48
-
Can Urban-rural Integration Decrease Energy Intensity? Empirical Study Based on China’s Inter-provincial Data
Shuxing Chen, Renzhong Ding, Biao Li49-58
-
Evolution of Patterns in the Ratio of Gender at Birth in Henan province, China
Cangyu Li, Xinhui Wang, Zhixiang Xie, Mingzhou Qin59-67
-
Indicators of Social Aspects of Sustainable Development in Selected Nationwide Databases
Paweł Rydzewski69-74
-
Pollution, Happiness and Willingness to Pay Taxes: The Value Effect of Public Environmental Policies
Nannan Liu, Rong Liu, Jian Huang, Lingshuang Chen75-86
-
From the Genealogy of the Environmental Thought: Marian Raciborski and Jan Gwalbert Pawlikowski
Leszek Gawor87-93
-
A Proposed Model for Green Practice Adoption and Implementation in Information Technology Based Organizations
Bokolo Anthony Jnr., Mazlina Abdul Majid, Awanis Romli95-112
-
Responsible Development and Durable Development
Wiesław Sztumski113-120
-
An e-Environment System for Socio-economic Sustainability and National Security
Emmanuel Okewu, Sanjay Misra, Luis Fernandez Sanz, Rytis Maskeliūnas, Robertas Damaševičius121-132
-
Sustainable Water Management in Cities under Climate Changes
Maciej Mrowiec, Ewa Ociepa, Robert Malmur, Iwona Deska133-138
-
Filial Churches as a Sustainable Development Constituent
Aleksandra Repelewicz139-144
-
What Factors can Influence the Expansion of Protected Areas around the World in the Context of International Environmental and Development Goals?
Zdeněk Opršal, Jaromír Harmáček, Petr Pavlík, Ivo Machar145-157
-
Upcycling as a Manifestation of Consumer and Business Behavior that Expresses Sustainable Consumption and Determines the Functioning of the Communal Services Sector
Michał Czuba159-163
-
Forced Migration in Ukraine and Reality of Sustainable Development Goals Achievement
Inna Semenenko, Olena Khandii165-172
-
The Impact of the CAP Green Programmes on Farm Productivity and its Social Contribution
Bazyli Czyzewski, Marta Guth, Anna Matuszczak173-183
-
Urban Shrinkage and the Identification of China’s Shrinking Cities. A study Based on Semi-Industrialized Semi-urbanized Structure
Chen Shuxing, Ding Renzhong185-195
-
Antibiotics in the Environment as one of the Barriers to Sustainable Development
Joanna Lach, Longina Stępniak, Agnieszka Ociepa-Kubicka197-207
-
Development of Road Infrastructure in Environmentally Valuable Areas – Sustainable Designing
Dariusz Boruszko, Wojciech Dąbrowski, Wiater Józefa209-216
-
Buddhist Attitude Towards Sustainable Development
Gyan Prakash217-220
Archives
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
This paper empirically analyzes individual attitudes on the tradeoff between environment and economy, and factors that might influence such choice for two representative countries: China and the United States. Based on the World Value Survey, the Chinese are found more inclined to support environmental protection, while people from the United States choose economic growth as priority. Considering three sets of correlates of sociodemographics, environmental attitude and social context, variables such as education, political affiliation and environmental consciousness show significance in influencing personal preferences, and the effect of health, age, employment and marital status demonstrates heterogeneity across countries. Such micro-level evidence on how the public weighs the economy versus environment can provide policy guidance for the government to better respond to public opinions.
Keywords:
References
ANTWEILER, W., COPELAND, B.R., & TAYLOR, M.S., 2001, Is free trade good for the environment? in: American Economic Review, 91(4), p. 877-908.
ARKESTEIJIN, K., & OERLEMANS, L.A., 2005, The early adoption of green power by Dutch households: An Empirical Exploration of Factors Influencing the Early Adoption of Green Electricity for Domestic Purposes, in: Energy Policy, 33(2), p. 183-196.
AZOMAHOUA, T., LAISNEY, F., & NGUYEN-VAN, P., 2006, Economic development and CO2 emissions: A nonparametric panel approach, in: Journal of Public Economics, 90(6-7), p. 1347-1363.
BARRETT, S., & GRADDY, K., 2000, Freedom, growth, and the environment, in: Environment and Development Economics, 5(04), p. 433-456.
BARR, S., 2007, Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management, in: Environment and Behavior, 39(4), p. 435-473.
BECKERMAN, W., 1992, Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment? in: World Development, 20(4), p. 481-496.
COLE, M., & ELLIOTT, R., 2003, Determining the trade-environment composition effect: The role of capital, labor and environmental regulations, in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), p. 363-383.
COOK, S.W., & JOY, L.B., 1981, Approaches to encouraging conservation behavior: A review and conceptual framework, in: Journal of Social Issues, 37(2), p. 73-107.
CUÑADO J., & DE GRACIA, F., 2013, Environment and happiness: New evidence for Spain, in: Social Indicators Research, 112(3), p. 549-567.
DAVIDSON, D.J., & FREUDENBURG, W.R., 1996, Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research, in: Environment and Behavior, 28(3), p. 302-339.
DOLNICAR, S., & GRÜN, B., 2009, Environmentally friendly behavior-- can heterogeneity among individuals and contexts/environments be harvested for improved sustainable management? in: Environment and Behavior, 41(5), p. 693-714.
ECKERSLEY, R., 1989, Green politics and the new class: selfishness or virtue? in: Political Studies, 37(2), p. 205-223.
FERREIRA, S., AKAY, A., BRERETON, F., CUÑADO, J., MARTINSSON, P., MORO, M., & NINGAL, T., 2013, Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe, in: Ecological Economics, 88(4),
p. 1-10.
FERREI-I-CARBONELL, A., & FRIJTERS, P., 2004, How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? in: The Economic Journal, 114(7), p. 641-659.
GADENNE, D., SHARMA, B., KERR, D., & SMITH, T., 2011, The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours, in: Energy Policy, 39(12), p. 7684-7694.
GALE, L.R., & MENDEZ, J.A., 1998, The empirical relationship between trade, growth and the environment, in: International Review of Economics & Finance, 7(1), p. 53-61.
GROSSMAN, G.M., & KRUEGER, A.B., 1995, Economic growth and the environment, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), p. 353-377.
HAMILTON, L.C., 2011, Education, politics and opinions about climate change: Evidence for interaction effects, in: Climatic Change, 104(2), p. 231-242.
HARBAUGH, W.T., LEVINSON, A., & WILSON, D.M., 2002, Reexamining the empirical evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve, in: Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(3), p. 541-551.
HEATH, Y., & GIFFORD, R., 2006, Free-Market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change, in: Environment and Behavior, 38(1), p. 48-71.
JONES, R.E., & DUNLAP, R.E., 1992, The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? in: Rural Sociology, 57(1), p. 28-47.
KAISER, F.G., WOLFING, S., & FUHRER, U., 1999, Environmental attitude and ecological behavior, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), p. 1-19.
LOWE, P., & RÜDIG, W., 1986, Political ecology and the social sciences – The state of the art, in: British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), p. 513-550.
MADDISON, D., & REHDANZ, K., 2011, The impact of climate on life satisfaction, in: Ecological Economics, 70(12), p. 2437-2445.
OLLI, E., GRENDSTAD, G., & WOLLEBAEK, D., 2001, Correlates of environmental behaviors bringing back social context, in: Environment and Behavior, 33(2), p. 181-208.
PERMAN, R., & STERN, D., 2003, Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the Environmental Kuznets Curve does not exist, in: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(3), p. 325-347.
RYDZEWSKI, P., 2015, Sustainable development as seen by the residents of Eastern and Western Europe on the basis of ISSP environment data, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 10(1), p. 49-53.
SCHULTZ, P.W., OSKAMP, S., & MAINIERI, T., 1995, Who recycles and when – A review of personal and situational factors., in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), p. 105-121.
SCOTT, D., 1999, Equal opportunity, unequal results determinants of household recycling intensity, in: Environment and Behavior, 31(2), p. 267-290.
STEEL, B.S., 1996, Thinking globally and acting locally? Environmental attitudes, behavior and activism, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 47(1), p. 27-36.
STERN, D.I., 1998, Progress on the Environmental Kuznets Curve? in: Environment and Development Economics, 3(02), p. 173-196.
SWAMI, V., CHAMORRO-PREMUZIC, T., SNELGAR, R., & FURNHAM, A., 2011, Personality, individual differences, and demographic antecedents of self-reported household waste management behaviours, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), p. 21-26.
VAN LIERE, K.D. and DUNLAP, R.E., 1980, The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence, in: Public Opinion Quarterly 44, p. 181-197
ZELEZNY, L.C., CHUA, P.P., & ALDRICH, C., 2000, New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism, in: Journal of Social issues, 56(3), p. 443-457.
Article Details
Abstract views: 70
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
