Responsible Development and Durable Development

Wiesław Sztumski


Silesian University, Katowice, Poland (Poland)


Abstract

In this article, it analyzes two contemporary models of social and economic development – responsible development and sustainable development. Reflections on responsibility in the present social and economic context precede reflections about the   essence of the model of the responsible development. For various reasons irresponsibility increasingly prevails over responsibility, and responsibility becomes anonymous and fictitious. Thus, the tendency to behave and to act with impunity grows. One of the forms of responsible development is the so-called smart growth. Above all, people appropriately educated and wise should realize it. Unfortunately, the number of stupid people in the world constantly increases. The model of sustainable development raises doubts from the beginning.  Almost all people criticize this model or refer to it in disbelief. Only optimists see it as the only chance for the survival of humanity. The choice between responsible and sustainable development is difficult, because each one is faulty. It would be good to create one model from these two models in a form of their synthesis. Certainly, that is a difficult challenge, but doable.


Keywords:

responsible development, durable development, sustainable development, responsibility, durability, balance, asymmetry

BOSTROM N., 2014, Superintelligence: Path, Dangers, Strategies, Oxford Univ. Press.
  Google Scholar

CARNAU P., 2011, Nachhaltigkeitsethik – Normativer Gestaltungsansatz für eine global zukunftsfähige Entwicklung in Theorie und Praxis, Rainer Hampe Verlag, München, p. 14.
  Google Scholar

CIPPOLA C. M., 1987, The Basic Laws Of Human Stupidity, in: Whole Earth Review, Spring.
  Google Scholar

CONNOR S., 2012, Human intelligence peaked thousands of years ago and we've been on an intellectual and emotional decline, in: The Independent, 12.11.2012.
  Google Scholar

FREUND R., 2017, Das Kapital in den Köpfen, in: working@office04, p. 32-33.
  Google Scholar

HARDTKE A., PREHN M., 2001, Perspektiven der Nachhaltigkeit – Vom Leitbild zur Erfolgsstrategie, Gabler, Wiesbaden.
  Google Scholar

HAUFF V., 1987, Unsere gemeinsame Zukunft – Der Brundtland-Bericht der Weltkommission für Umwelt und Entwicklung, Eggenkamp, Greven.
  Google Scholar

KURZWEIL R., 2014, Menschheit 2.0: Die Singularität naht, Lola Books, Berlin.
  Google Scholar

Nachhaltige Landwirtschaft: Staatssektretär Rabius sieht Schleswig Holstein auf Gutem Weg, in: Hallo ‘Hollstein‘, Nachrichten und Themen von der Ostseeküste, 29. Oktober 2010.
  Google Scholar

10. PATT A., 2013, Der Sinn der Nachaltigkeit, in: ETH Sustainability Blog, October.
  Google Scholar

11. PIEŃKOWSKI A., 1998, Wiek Ziemi, in: Wiedza i Życie, No 4.
  Google Scholar

112. PUFE I., 2014, Was ist Nachhaltigkeit? Dimensionen und Chancen, in: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte – Nachhaltigkeit, 64, p. 6.
  Google Scholar

13. RÓŻANOWSKI K.,2007, Sztuczna inteligencja: Rozwój, szanse i zagrożenia, in: Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Informatyki w Warszawie, z. 2.
  Google Scholar

114. SOWA A., 2015, Menschheit 3.0. Internet der Dinge. Oder: die Welt ohne Menschheit, 06.06.2015, https://wszystkoconajwazniejsze.pl/aleksandra-sowa-menschheit-3-0-internet-der-dinge-oder-die-welt-ohne-menschen (06.06.2017).
  Google Scholar

15. SZTUMSKI W., 2009, The Mythology of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, Vol. 4, No 2.
  Google Scholar

16. SZTUMSKI W., 2012, Erozja odpowiedzialności, in: Sprawy Nauki, No. 2.
  Google Scholar

17. SZTUMSKI W., 2013, Od homo rationalis do homo prodigus, in: Sprawy Nauki.
  Google Scholar

18. SZTUMSKI W., 2015, Marnotrawstwo intelektualne, in: Sprawy Nauki, No 8-9.
  Google Scholar

119. WULLEWEBER K., 2000, Was die Sprache über Nachhaltigkeit verrät, in: Politische Ökologie, No 63/64, Januar, p. 23.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2018-01-02

Cited by

Sztumski, W. (2018). Responsible Development and Durable Development. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 13(1), 113–120. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/5043

Authors

Wiesław Sztumski 

Silesian University, Katowice, Poland Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 9
PDF downloads: 4