Responsible Development and Durable Development
Wiesław Sztumski
Silesian University, Katowice, Poland (Poland)
Abstract
In this article, it analyzes two contemporary models of social and economic development – responsible development and sustainable development. Reflections on responsibility in the present social and economic context precede reflections about the essence of the model of the responsible development. For various reasons irresponsibility increasingly prevails over responsibility, and responsibility becomes anonymous and fictitious. Thus, the tendency to behave and to act with impunity grows. One of the forms of responsible development is the so-called smart growth. Above all, people appropriately educated and wise should realize it. Unfortunately, the number of stupid people in the world constantly increases. The model of sustainable development raises doubts from the beginning. Almost all people criticize this model or refer to it in disbelief. Only optimists see it as the only chance for the survival of humanity. The choice between responsible and sustainable development is difficult, because each one is faulty. It would be good to create one model from these two models in a form of their synthesis. Certainly, that is a difficult challenge, but doable.
Keywords:
responsible development, durable development, sustainable development, responsibility, durability, balance, asymmetryReferences
BOSTROM N., 2014, Superintelligence: Path, Dangers, Strategies, Oxford Univ. Press.
Google Scholar
CARNAU P., 2011, Nachhaltigkeitsethik – Normativer Gestaltungsansatz für eine global zukunftsfähige Entwicklung in Theorie und Praxis, Rainer Hampe Verlag, München, p. 14.
Google Scholar
CIPPOLA C. M., 1987, The Basic Laws Of Human Stupidity, in: Whole Earth Review, Spring.
Google Scholar
CONNOR S., 2012, Human intelligence peaked thousands of years ago and we've been on an intellectual and emotional decline, in: The Independent, 12.11.2012.
Google Scholar
FREUND R., 2017, Das Kapital in den Köpfen, in: working@office04, p. 32-33.
Google Scholar
HARDTKE A., PREHN M., 2001, Perspektiven der Nachhaltigkeit – Vom Leitbild zur Erfolgsstrategie, Gabler, Wiesbaden.
Google Scholar
HAUFF V., 1987, Unsere gemeinsame Zukunft – Der Brundtland-Bericht der Weltkommission für Umwelt und Entwicklung, Eggenkamp, Greven.
Google Scholar
KURZWEIL R., 2014, Menschheit 2.0: Die Singularität naht, Lola Books, Berlin.
Google Scholar
Nachhaltige Landwirtschaft: Staatssektretär Rabius sieht Schleswig Holstein auf Gutem Weg, in: Hallo ‘Hollstein‘, Nachrichten und Themen von der Ostseeküste, 29. Oktober 2010.
Google Scholar
10. PATT A., 2013, Der Sinn der Nachaltigkeit, in: ETH Sustainability Blog, October.
Google Scholar
11. PIEŃKOWSKI A., 1998, Wiek Ziemi, in: Wiedza i Życie, No 4.
Google Scholar
112. PUFE I., 2014, Was ist Nachhaltigkeit? Dimensionen und Chancen, in: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte – Nachhaltigkeit, 64, p. 6.
Google Scholar
13. RÓŻANOWSKI K.,2007, Sztuczna inteligencja: Rozwój, szanse i zagrożenia, in: Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Informatyki w Warszawie, z. 2.
Google Scholar
114. SOWA A., 2015, Menschheit 3.0. Internet der Dinge. Oder: die Welt ohne Menschheit, 06.06.2015, https://wszystkoconajwazniejsze.pl/aleksandra-sowa-menschheit-3-0-internet-der-dinge-oder-die-welt-ohne-menschen (06.06.2017).
Google Scholar
15. SZTUMSKI W., 2009, The Mythology of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, Vol. 4, No 2.
Google Scholar
16. SZTUMSKI W., 2012, Erozja odpowiedzialności, in: Sprawy Nauki, No. 2.
Google Scholar
17. SZTUMSKI W., 2013, Od homo rationalis do homo prodigus, in: Sprawy Nauki.
Google Scholar
18. SZTUMSKI W., 2015, Marnotrawstwo intelektualne, in: Sprawy Nauki, No 8-9.
Google Scholar
119. WULLEWEBER K., 2000, Was die Sprache über Nachhaltigkeit verrät, in: Politische Ökologie, No 63/64, Januar, p. 23.
Google Scholar
Authors
Wiesław SztumskiSilesian University, Katowice, Poland Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 18PDF downloads: 9
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.