Responsible Development and Durable Development
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 13 No. 1 (2018)
-
The Enlightenment Assumptions of the Brundtland Report
Andrzej Papuziński7-14
-
The Tradeoff between Growth and Environment: Evidence from China and the United States
Jing Xu, Jianjun Li15-20
-
Attaining the Energy Sustainability: Analysis of the Ecuadorian Strategy
Juan Lata-García, Christopher Reyes-Lopez, Francisco Jurado21-29
-
Sovereign Wealth Funds as a Tool to Invest in Renewable Energy in Africa
Olga Rataj31-39
-
Problems in the Accomplishment of Solar and Wind Energy in India
Himanshu Sharma, Pankaj Kumar, Nitai Pal, Pradip Kumar Sadhu41-48
-
Can Urban-rural Integration Decrease Energy Intensity? Empirical Study Based on China’s Inter-provincial Data
Shuxing Chen, Renzhong Ding, Biao Li49-58
-
Evolution of Patterns in the Ratio of Gender at Birth in Henan province, China
Cangyu Li, Xinhui Wang, Zhixiang Xie, Mingzhou Qin59-67
-
Indicators of Social Aspects of Sustainable Development in Selected Nationwide Databases
Paweł Rydzewski69-74
-
Pollution, Happiness and Willingness to Pay Taxes: The Value Effect of Public Environmental Policies
Nannan Liu, Rong Liu, Jian Huang, Lingshuang Chen75-86
-
From the Genealogy of the Environmental Thought: Marian Raciborski and Jan Gwalbert Pawlikowski
Leszek Gawor87-93
-
A Proposed Model for Green Practice Adoption and Implementation in Information Technology Based Organizations
Bokolo Anthony Jnr., Mazlina Abdul Majid, Awanis Romli95-112
-
Responsible Development and Durable Development
Wiesław Sztumski113-120
-
An e-Environment System for Socio-economic Sustainability and National Security
Emmanuel Okewu, Sanjay Misra, Luis Fernandez Sanz, Rytis Maskeliūnas, Robertas Damaševičius121-132
-
Sustainable Water Management in Cities under Climate Changes
Maciej Mrowiec, Ewa Ociepa, Robert Malmur, Iwona Deska133-138
-
Filial Churches as a Sustainable Development Constituent
Aleksandra Repelewicz139-144
-
What Factors can Influence the Expansion of Protected Areas around the World in the Context of International Environmental and Development Goals?
Zdeněk Opršal, Jaromír Harmáček, Petr Pavlík, Ivo Machar145-157
-
Upcycling as a Manifestation of Consumer and Business Behavior that Expresses Sustainable Consumption and Determines the Functioning of the Communal Services Sector
Michał Czuba159-163
-
Forced Migration in Ukraine and Reality of Sustainable Development Goals Achievement
Inna Semenenko, Olena Khandii165-172
-
The Impact of the CAP Green Programmes on Farm Productivity and its Social Contribution
Bazyli Czyzewski, Marta Guth, Anna Matuszczak173-183
-
Urban Shrinkage and the Identification of China’s Shrinking Cities. A study Based on Semi-Industrialized Semi-urbanized Structure
Chen Shuxing, Ding Renzhong185-195
-
Antibiotics in the Environment as one of the Barriers to Sustainable Development
Joanna Lach, Longina Stępniak, Agnieszka Ociepa-Kubicka197-207
-
Development of Road Infrastructure in Environmentally Valuable Areas – Sustainable Designing
Dariusz Boruszko, Wojciech Dąbrowski, Wiater Józefa209-216
-
Buddhist Attitude Towards Sustainable Development
Gyan Prakash217-220
Archives
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
In this article, it analyzes two contemporary models of social and economic development – responsible development and sustainable development. Reflections on responsibility in the present social and economic context precede reflections about the essence of the model of the responsible development. For various reasons irresponsibility increasingly prevails over responsibility, and responsibility becomes anonymous and fictitious. Thus, the tendency to behave and to act with impunity grows. One of the forms of responsible development is the so-called smart growth. Above all, people appropriately educated and wise should realize it. Unfortunately, the number of stupid people in the world constantly increases. The model of sustainable development raises doubts from the beginning. Almost all people criticize this model or refer to it in disbelief. Only optimists see it as the only chance for the survival of humanity. The choice between responsible and sustainable development is difficult, because each one is faulty. It would be good to create one model from these two models in a form of their synthesis. Certainly, that is a difficult challenge, but doable.
Keywords:
References
BOSTROM N., 2014, Superintelligence: Path, Dangers, Strategies, Oxford Univ. Press.
CARNAU P., 2011, Nachhaltigkeitsethik – Normativer Gestaltungsansatz für eine global zukunftsfähige Entwicklung in Theorie und Praxis, Rainer Hampe Verlag, München, p. 14.
CIPPOLA C. M., 1987, The Basic Laws Of Human Stupidity, in: Whole Earth Review, Spring.
CONNOR S., 2012, Human intelligence peaked thousands of years ago and we've been on an intellectual and emotional decline, in: The Independent, 12.11.2012.
FREUND R., 2017, Das Kapital in den Köpfen, in: working@office04, p. 32-33.
HARDTKE A., PREHN M., 2001, Perspektiven der Nachhaltigkeit – Vom Leitbild zur Erfolgsstrategie, Gabler, Wiesbaden.
HAUFF V., 1987, Unsere gemeinsame Zukunft – Der Brundtland-Bericht der Weltkommission für Umwelt und Entwicklung, Eggenkamp, Greven.
KURZWEIL R., 2014, Menschheit 2.0: Die Singularität naht, Lola Books, Berlin.
Nachhaltige Landwirtschaft: Staatssektretär Rabius sieht Schleswig Holstein auf Gutem Weg, in: Hallo ‘Hollstein‘, Nachrichten und Themen von der Ostseeküste, 29. Oktober 2010.
10. PATT A., 2013, Der Sinn der Nachaltigkeit, in: ETH Sustainability Blog, October.
11. PIEŃKOWSKI A., 1998, Wiek Ziemi, in: Wiedza i Życie, No 4.
112. PUFE I., 2014, Was ist Nachhaltigkeit? Dimensionen und Chancen, in: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte – Nachhaltigkeit, 64, p. 6.
13. RÓŻANOWSKI K.,2007, Sztuczna inteligencja: Rozwój, szanse i zagrożenia, in: Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Informatyki w Warszawie, z. 2.
114. SOWA A., 2015, Menschheit 3.0. Internet der Dinge. Oder: die Welt ohne Menschheit, 06.06.2015, https://wszystkoconajwazniejsze.pl/aleksandra-sowa-menschheit-3-0-internet-der-dinge-oder-die-welt-ohne-menschen (06.06.2017).
15. SZTUMSKI W., 2009, The Mythology of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, Vol. 4, No 2.
16. SZTUMSKI W., 2012, Erozja odpowiedzialności, in: Sprawy Nauki, No. 2.
17. SZTUMSKI W., 2013, Od homo rationalis do homo prodigus, in: Sprawy Nauki.
18. SZTUMSKI W., 2015, Marnotrawstwo intelektualne, in: Sprawy Nauki, No 8-9.
119. WULLEWEBER K., 2000, Was die Sprache über Nachhaltigkeit verrät, in: Politische Ökologie, No 63/64, Januar, p. 23.
Article Details
Abstract views: 66
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
