Education for All and Sustainable Development: An Empirical Study on Family Cognition and Household Resource Using in China
Shuxing Chen
School of Economics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China (China)
Yuxiang Gao
School of Economics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China (China)
Abstract
Education for sustainable development has achieved a lot in the past decade. However, the extent to which sustainable development education can achieve sustainability is still unclear. This article uses the survey data of Chinese families and establishes an empirical analysis model. By using the transition of China’s sustainable development education mode as a recognition strategy and using DID method to analyze this issue, we found out that the sustainable education in schools can only help families correctly understand the status quo of sustainable development, but it cannot improve the household sustainability. After implementing the education for sustainable development for all (ESDFA), the average monthly electricity use of the affected Chinese households has decreased by 79.6124 kWh, which is a drop of 41.56%; household carbon dioxide emissions has decreased by 123.8958 kg, which is a drop of 49.16%. Among them, households with their heads aged 40-55 were the most significant. The mechanism analysis shows that the greater the scope of the population covered by ESDFA, the more obvious the effect of reducing family resource use, and there may be a mechanism similar to the herding effect.
Keywords:
Education for all, sustainable development, Chinese family cognition, family resource useReferences
DE HAAN G., 2006, The BLK ‘21’programme in Germany: a ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’‐based model for Education for Sustainable Development, in: Environmental Education Research, 12(1), p. 19- 32.
Google Scholar
HOPKINS C., MCKEOWN R., 2002, Education for sustainable development: an international perspective, in: Education and sustainability: Responding to the global challenge, 13.
Google Scholar
HUCKLE J., WALS A.E.J., 2015, The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: business as usual in the end, in: Environmental Education Research, 21(3), p. 491-505.
Google Scholar
KOPNINA H., 2013, Evaluating education for sustainable development (ESD): Using ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the sustainable development (EAATSD) scale, in: Environment, Development and sustainability, 15(3), p. 607-623.
Google Scholar
KOPNINA H., 2014, Revisiting education for sustainable development (ESD): Examining anthropocentric bias through the transition of environmental education to ESD, in: Sustainable development, 22(2), p. 73-83.
Google Scholar
LOZANO R., LOZANO F.J., MULDER K., et al., 2013, Advancing higher education for sustainable development: international insights and critical reflections.
Google Scholar
SAUVÉ L., 1996, Environmental education and sustainable development: A further appraisal, in: Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 1, p. 7-34.
Google Scholar
UNESCO, 2005, UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005-2014: The DESD at a glance, Paris.
Google Scholar
VARE P., SCOTT W., 2007, Learning for a change: Exploring the relationship between education and sustainable development, in: Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(2), p. 191-198.
Google Scholar
WALS A., NOLAN C., 2012, Shaping the Education of Tomorrow: 2012 Report on the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development, Abridged, Paris.
Google Scholar
Authors
Shuxing ChenSchool of Economics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China China
Authors
Yuxiang GaoSchool of Economics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China China
Statistics
Abstract views: 23PDF downloads: 7
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
