For Further Social Development, Peaceful, Safe and Useful for People
Wiesław Sztumski
University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-007 Katowice 11, Bankowa St., Poland (Poland)
Abstract
In the 21st century, social progress based on the idea of the earlier Enlightenment (productivity, rationalism and respect for private good) brought humanity to the brink of the abyss. Its further continuation threatens to destroy humanity, and maybe even our planet. This warning is included in the first and second report of the Club of Rome. Therefore, the authors of the second report from 2017, Ernst Ulrich v. Weizsäcker and Anders Wijkman, recommend creating a New Enlightenment. This is a challenge for the present generation – the last one that can and should do this to protect humankind from cataclysm. Above all, one has to stop the irresponsible and harmful social progress, which crosses the limits of growth. However, not everyone agrees with this. Some people (e.g. S. Pinker) claim that one not needs a new Enlightenment. On the contrary, one needs to continue the development the ideas of early Enlightenment and to guide yet more by reason and science to ensure an increase in productivity and prosperity. In addition, the problems of the modern world are not as great as it is presented in the reports of the Club of Rome. One can solve them using reason and science. Therefore, instead of weakening the role of reason, one should strengthen it by eliminating elements of irrationality from people’s thinking and behavior. In addition, all negative effects of the Enlightenment are finally useful. So, there are two opposing concepts to get out of the impasse. One is utopian and the other is excessively realistic. As usual, extreme ideas are not the best. Therefore, one must seek for a way out between them and find some golden mean.
Keywords:
social development, civilization, existential threats, New Enlightenment, New Ethics, transformation of consciousnessReferences
BRONIATOWSKI M., 2019, The Union frights: humanity will die if we do not stop the temperature rise, in: Politico, 08.04.
Google Scholar
DELAVY R., 2005, Macht x Dummheit = Selbstzerstörung. Wie viel ‚Mensch‘ braucht der Planet? Kaos Verlag, Wollerau.
Google Scholar
GRAY A., 2019, These are the biggest risks the world faces, in: World Economic Forum, 20.03.
Google Scholar
MEADOWS D. & D., FORESTER J. W. RANDERS J., BEHRENS W., 1972, The Limits to Growth, Universe Books.
Google Scholar
NOWACKI W., 1983, Civilization and Logic. The Law of Inversely Proportional Stupidity, NOW Forest Hills, New York.
Google Scholar
PAWLOWA N., 2019, Regieren der Militärmacht ist heute brisanter als im Kalten Krieg, in: Sputnik Deutschland, 22.02.
Google Scholar
PINKER S., 2012, Better Angels of our Nature, Peguin Publishing Group.
Google Scholar
PINKER S., 2018, Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress, Viking, New York.
Google Scholar
POPE FRANCIS, 2015, Laudato Si’, http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/pl/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html (2.01.2019).
Google Scholar
SZTUMSKI W., 1988, O materialistyczno-dialektycznym pojęciu rozwoju. Analiza cech i kryteriów rozwoju/ About the materialistic-dialectical conception of development. Analysis of features and criteria, Politechnika Częstochowska, Częstochowa.
Google Scholar
SZTUMSKI W., 1997, Enwironmentalizm i cywilizacja życia/ Environmentalism and civilization of life), Katowice.
Google Scholar
SZTUMSKI W., 1998, Od racionalizmu a scientizmu k ekologizmu/ From rationalism and scientism to ecologyism), in: Pedagogicke rozhlady. Metodicko-pedagogicke centra Slovenska, 4.
Google Scholar
SZTUMSKI W., 2011, Krupierzy świata/ Croupiers of the Word), in: Sprawy Nauki, 3.
Google Scholar
SZTUMSKI W., 2011, Marsz ku wolności czy pęd ku zniewoleniu?/ A march towards freedom or a drive to enslave?, in: Sprawy Nauki, 4.
Google Scholar
SZTUMSKI W., 2012, Człowiek wobec środowiska. Propedeutyka sozofilozofii/ Man towards the environment. Propedeutics of sozophilosophy), Wyższa Szkoła Lingwistyczna, Częstochowa.
Google Scholar
WEIZSÄCKER E. U. v., WIJKMAN A., 2017, Wir sind dran. Club of Rome. Der große Bericht. Was wir ändern müssen, wenn wir bleiben wollen. Eine neue Aufklärung für eine volle Welt, Gütersloher Verlagshaus, München.
Google Scholar
Authors
Wiesław SztumskiUniversity of Silesia in Katowice, 40-007 Katowice 11, Bankowa St., Poland Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 17PDF downloads: 4
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
