For Further Social Development, Peaceful, Safe and Useful for People
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 14 No. 2 (2019)
-
Assessment of Sustainable Development Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser7-24
-
For Further Social Development, Peaceful, Safe and Useful for People
Wiesław Sztumski25-32
-
Sustainability Challenges in Energy Use Behaviour in Households: Comparative Review of Selected Survey-based Publications from Developed and Developing Countries
Tore Johansson, Pedram Pirouzfar33-44
-
Disadvantages Connected With the Development of Tourism in the Contemporary World and the Concept of Sustainable Tourism
Katarzyna Podhorodecka, Anna Dudek45-55
-
Social Justice and Sustainable Development
Mayavee Singh57-62
-
Looking at the Impacts of Income Inequality on Environmental Governance in China
Yao Bo Shi, Xin Xin Zhao, Chyi-Lu Jang, Qiang Fu, Chun-Ping Chang63-70
-
Bioeconomy – Opportunities and Dilemmas in the Context of Human Rights Protection and Environmental Resource Management
Piotr Krajewski71-79
-
Current Challenges of Sustainable Rural Development in Russia: Trends and Prospects
Aleksey Anisimov, Olga Popova, Valentina Ustyukova81-90
-
The Concept of Human Needs in Sustainable Development of Cities
Jolanta Rodzoś91-99
-
An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Behaviors in China’s Public and Private Sectors
Yu Yang, Shizhi Huang, Xingting Huang101-110
-
Sustainable Development – Utopia or Implementation Possibilities?
Paweł Bukrejewski, Anna Latawiec, Anna Matuszewska111-116
-
Implementing Sustainability in Global Supply Chain
Krishnendu Shaw117-127
-
Sustainable Development versus Gender Gap – Do Women Matter?
Ada Domańska, Beata Żukowska, Robert Zajkowski129-142
-
Deep Neural Networks for Curbing Climate Change-Induced Farmers-Herdsmen Clashes in a Sustainable Social Inclusion Initiative
Emmanuel Okewu, Sanjay Misra, Luis Fernandez Sanz, Foluso Ayeni, Victor Mbarika, Robertas Damaševičius143-155
-
Pro-environmental Behaviours in Hotels in the COntext of Sustainable Development of Tourism – Barriers to Shaping and Recommendations for Further Research
Marek Bugdol, Daniel Puciato, Tadeusz Borys157-170
-
Health Evaluation of R&D and Transformation Functional Platform
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu171-182
-
Violence on the Natural Environment
Joanna Kostecka, Kevin R. Butt183-189
-
Comparative Assessment and Obstacles in the Advancement of Renewable Energy in India and China
Pankaj Kumar, Himanshu Sharma, Nitai Pal, Pradip Kumar Sadhu183-189
-
Golden Age Population, Healthy Environment, Growth and Poverty: Are Malaysia Really in a Sustainable Condition?
Nanthakumar Loganathan, Lekha Kunju Pillai Laxman, Abbas Mardani, Dalia Streimikiene, Asan Ali Golam Hassan201-212
-
Pope Francis’s Proposition of Integral Ecology
Krzysztof Bochenek213-220
Archives
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
In the 21st century, social progress based on the idea of the earlier Enlightenment (productivity, rationalism and respect for private good) brought humanity to the brink of the abyss. Its further continuation threatens to destroy humanity, and maybe even our planet. This warning is included in the first and second report of the Club of Rome. Therefore, the authors of the second report from 2017, Ernst Ulrich v. Weizsäcker and Anders Wijkman, recommend creating a New Enlightenment. This is a challenge for the present generation – the last one that can and should do this to protect humankind from cataclysm. Above all, one has to stop the irresponsible and harmful social progress, which crosses the limits of growth. However, not everyone agrees with this. Some people (e.g. S. Pinker) claim that one not needs a new Enlightenment. On the contrary, one needs to continue the development the ideas of early Enlightenment and to guide yet more by reason and science to ensure an increase in productivity and prosperity. In addition, the problems of the modern world are not as great as it is presented in the reports of the Club of Rome. One can solve them using reason and science. Therefore, instead of weakening the role of reason, one should strengthen it by eliminating elements of irrationality from people’s thinking and behavior. In addition, all negative effects of the Enlightenment are finally useful. So, there are two opposing concepts to get out of the impasse. One is utopian and the other is excessively realistic. As usual, extreme ideas are not the best. Therefore, one must seek for a way out between them and find some golden mean.
Keywords:
References
BRONIATOWSKI M., 2019, The Union frights: humanity will die if we do not stop the temperature rise, in: Politico, 08.04.
DELAVY R., 2005, Macht x Dummheit = Selbstzerstörung. Wie viel ‚Mensch‘ braucht der Planet? Kaos Verlag, Wollerau.
GRAY A., 2019, These are the biggest risks the world faces, in: World Economic Forum, 20.03.
MEADOWS D. & D., FORESTER J. W. RANDERS J., BEHRENS W., 1972, The Limits to Growth, Universe Books.
NOWACKI W., 1983, Civilization and Logic. The Law of Inversely Proportional Stupidity, NOW Forest Hills, New York.
PAWLOWA N., 2019, Regieren der Militärmacht ist heute brisanter als im Kalten Krieg, in: Sputnik Deutschland, 22.02.
PINKER S., 2012, Better Angels of our Nature, Peguin Publishing Group.
PINKER S., 2018, Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress, Viking, New York.
POPE FRANCIS, 2015, Laudato Si’, http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/pl/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html (2.01.2019).
SZTUMSKI W., 1988, O materialistyczno-dialektycznym pojęciu rozwoju. Analiza cech i kryteriów rozwoju/ About the materialistic-dialectical conception of development. Analysis of features and criteria, Politechnika Częstochowska, Częstochowa.
SZTUMSKI W., 1997, Enwironmentalizm i cywilizacja życia/ Environmentalism and civilization of life), Katowice.
SZTUMSKI W., 1998, Od racionalizmu a scientizmu k ekologizmu/ From rationalism and scientism to ecologyism), in: Pedagogicke rozhlady. Metodicko-pedagogicke centra Slovenska, 4.
SZTUMSKI W., 2011, Krupierzy świata/ Croupiers of the Word), in: Sprawy Nauki, 3.
SZTUMSKI W., 2011, Marsz ku wolności czy pęd ku zniewoleniu?/ A march towards freedom or a drive to enslave?, in: Sprawy Nauki, 4.
SZTUMSKI W., 2012, Człowiek wobec środowiska. Propedeutyka sozofilozofii/ Man towards the environment. Propedeutics of sozophilosophy), Wyższa Szkoła Lingwistyczna, Częstochowa.
WEIZSÄCKER E. U. v., WIJKMAN A., 2017, Wir sind dran. Club of Rome. Der große Bericht. Was wir ändern müssen, wenn wir bleiben wollen. Eine neue Aufklärung für eine volle Welt, Gütersloher Verlagshaus, München.
Article Details
Abstract views: 91
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
