Bioeconomy – Opportunities and Dilemmas in the Context of Human Rights Protection and Environmental Resource Management
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 14 No. 2 (2019)
-
Assessment of Sustainable Development Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser7-24
-
For Further Social Development, Peaceful, Safe and Useful for People
Wiesław Sztumski25-32
-
Sustainability Challenges in Energy Use Behaviour in Households: Comparative Review of Selected Survey-based Publications from Developed and Developing Countries
Tore Johansson, Pedram Pirouzfar33-44
-
Disadvantages Connected With the Development of Tourism in the Contemporary World and the Concept of Sustainable Tourism
Katarzyna Podhorodecka, Anna Dudek45-55
-
Social Justice and Sustainable Development
Mayavee Singh57-62
-
Looking at the Impacts of Income Inequality on Environmental Governance in China
Yao Bo Shi, Xin Xin Zhao, Chyi-Lu Jang, Qiang Fu, Chun-Ping Chang63-70
-
Bioeconomy – Opportunities and Dilemmas in the Context of Human Rights Protection and Environmental Resource Management
Piotr Krajewski71-79
-
Current Challenges of Sustainable Rural Development in Russia: Trends and Prospects
Aleksey Anisimov, Olga Popova, Valentina Ustyukova81-90
-
The Concept of Human Needs in Sustainable Development of Cities
Jolanta Rodzoś91-99
-
An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Behaviors in China’s Public and Private Sectors
Yu Yang, Shizhi Huang, Xingting Huang101-110
-
Sustainable Development – Utopia or Implementation Possibilities?
Paweł Bukrejewski, Anna Latawiec, Anna Matuszewska111-116
-
Implementing Sustainability in Global Supply Chain
Krishnendu Shaw117-127
-
Sustainable Development versus Gender Gap – Do Women Matter?
Ada Domańska, Beata Żukowska, Robert Zajkowski129-142
-
Deep Neural Networks for Curbing Climate Change-Induced Farmers-Herdsmen Clashes in a Sustainable Social Inclusion Initiative
Emmanuel Okewu, Sanjay Misra, Luis Fernandez Sanz, Foluso Ayeni, Victor Mbarika, Robertas Damaševičius143-155
-
Pro-environmental Behaviours in Hotels in the COntext of Sustainable Development of Tourism – Barriers to Shaping and Recommendations for Further Research
Marek Bugdol, Daniel Puciato, Tadeusz Borys157-170
-
Health Evaluation of R&D and Transformation Functional Platform
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu171-182
-
Violence on the Natural Environment
Joanna Kostecka, Kevin R. Butt183-189
-
Comparative Assessment and Obstacles in the Advancement of Renewable Energy in India and China
Pankaj Kumar, Himanshu Sharma, Nitai Pal, Pradip Kumar Sadhu183-189
-
Golden Age Population, Healthy Environment, Growth and Poverty: Are Malaysia Really in a Sustainable Condition?
Nanthakumar Loganathan, Lekha Kunju Pillai Laxman, Abbas Mardani, Dalia Streimikiene, Asan Ali Golam Hassan201-212
-
Pope Francis’s Proposition of Integral Ecology
Krzysztof Bochenek213-220
Archives
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The notion of bioeconomy, appearing in publications, usually carries positive connotations, even to those less informed. It signifies a new approach towards economic development that is rather not perceived through the prism of unavoidable losses in the environment and reaching for further deposits of required raw materials. It turns out that – at least according to the assumptions and quite probably also in practice – it can be done differently, i.e. at the same level of efficiency, yet without negative effects on people and the environment. The idea of bioeconomy is one of the strategic conceptions of sustainable development, i.e. the method of implementing current economic objectives due to the new technological solutions with reduced use of natural resources and impact on the environment, having in mind future generations; this is an intention to adjust, to the maximum possible degree, developmental activities to absorption capacity of natural and man-made ecosystems.
The weakest point in these attempts, as it may seem, is the lack of knowledge concerning the long-term results of creating social perception for bioeconomy development, and consequently, dilemmas concerning possible sanitary-epidemiological and demographical changes evoked by (slightly different, but reaching as far as those in the present time) interference with the environment.
Keywords:
References
GAŁUSZKA A., Z. MIGASZEWSKI, 2009, Problemy zrównoważonego użytkowania surowców mineralnych, Problems of Sustainable Use of Mineral Resources, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 4(1), p. 123-130.
KOŚMICKI E., D. PIEŃKOWSKI, 2013, In Search of the Present Economy and Society Modernisation Concept (An Attempt to Explain the Main Problems), in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 8(1), p. 115-123.
MIZERSKI R., 2015, Prawa człowieka a ekonomia, in: Prawo i Więź, 3(13), p. 16-44.
MÖLDERS T., A. SZUMELDA, U. von WINTERFELD, 2014, Sufficiency and subsistence – on two important concepts for sustainable development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 9(1), p. 21-27.
PAJEWSKI T., 2014, Biogospodarka jako strategiczny element zrównoważonego rolnictwa, in: Roczniki Naukowe, t. XVI, z. 5, p. 179-184.
PISZCZALKA J., M. KORENKO, K. RUTKOWSKI, 2007, Ocena energetyczno-ekonomiczna ogrzewania dendromasą, in: Inżynieria Rolnicza, 6(94), p. 189-196.
SODANO V. (2013), Una valutazione di alcuni documenti pubblici sulla bioeconomia attraverso l’Analisi Critica del Discorso, in: Agriregionieuropa anno 9 n°34, Set 2013, https://agriregionieuropa.univpm.it/it/content/article/31/34/una-valutazione-di-alcuni-documenti-pubblici-sulla-bioeconomia-attraverso?page=0%25252C0%25252C1%252C0%252C2&qt-eventi=0 (1.12.2018).
SZAFRUGA P., 2013, Nadbrzeżne państwa dysfunkcyjne jako źródła zagrożeń dla środowiska, in: R. Kłosowicz (red.), Państwa dysfunkcyjne i ich destabilizujący wpływ na stosunki międzynarodowe, ed. Kłosowicz R. ed., Kraków, p. 167-194.
VERGARI U. (2010), Governare la vita. Tra biopotere e biopolitica, Trento.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52012DC0060 (1.12.2018).
UN, 1992, Convention on Biological Diversity, Rio de Janeiro.
UNESCO, 2005, Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions.
Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009, establishing a framework for the setting of eco-design requirements for energy-related products, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=cele x%3A32009L0125 (1.12.2018).
Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008L0 098 (1.12.2018).
Directive 2004/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste - Statement by the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32004L0012 (1.12.2018).
Directive 2012/19/EU of The European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3 A32012L0019 (1.12.2018).
Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1999/31/oj (1.12.2018).
European Commission, 2011, The European Bioeconomy in 2030, a White Paper, http://www.epsoweb.org/file/560 (1.12.2018).
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Madrid.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions, Closing the loop – A EU action plan for the Circular Economy, https://www.eea.europa.eu/ policy-documents/com-2015-0614-final (1.12.2018).
Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej/ Constitution of the Republic of Poland, Dz. U. z 1997 r. Nr 78, poz. 483, z 2001 r. Nr 28, poz. 319, z 2006 r. Nr 200, poz. 1471, z 2009 r., Nr 114, poz. 946.
Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization in the Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32014R0511 (1.12.2018).
Report on innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe, 2013, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A7-2013-0201+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN (1.12.2018).
Tools for evaluating and monitoring the EU bioeconomy: Indicators, 2013, http://www3.lei.wur.nl/SATBBE_Publications/SAT-BBE%20-%20WP2%20-%20Deliverable%202.2_FINAL_20140116.pdf (1.12.2018).
Uchwała Nr 213 Rady Ministrów z 6.11.2015 r. w sprawie zatwierdzenia Programu ochrony i zrównoważonego użytkowania różnorodności biologicznej wraz z Planem działań na lata 2015–2020, in: Monitor Polski, https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/pl/pl-nbsa p-v3-pl.pdf (1.12.2018).
UNESCO, 2001, Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity.
Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions, Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy, 2015, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015DC0614 (1.12.2018).
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe, 2015, http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/official-strategy_en.pdf (1.12.2018).
Łódzka Deklaracja Bioregionów, Łódź, 6 października 2016, http://bioeconomy.lodzkie.pl/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2017/11/LODZ-BIOCOMMUNITIES-DECLARATIONfinalPL33.pdf (1.12.2018).
BIOTECHNOLOGIA.PL III Międzynarodowy Kongres Bioekonomii, http://biotechnologia.pl/biotechnologia/iii-miedzynarodowy-kongres-bioekonomii, 1456 9 (1.12.218).
The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, 2011, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/info/pubs/docs/brochures/2020%20Biod%20brochure%20final%20lowres.pdf (1.12.2018)
Closing the loop: Commission adopts ambitious new Circular Economy Package to boost competitiveness, create jobs and generate sustainable growth, 2015, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-62 03_pl.htm (1.12.2018).
PULS BIZNESU, 2018, Czas złapać wiatr od morza, https://www.pb.pl/czas-zlapac-wiatr-od-morza-902816 (1.12.2018).
Article Details
Abstract views: 66
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
