NER300: Success or Failure of Public Support for Low-emission Technologies?
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020)
-
China’s Environmental Protection in the New Era from the Perspective of Eco-civilization Construction
Qingzhi Huan7-14
-
The Function and Perception of Urban Ecosystem Services in the Society
Fredrik Edlund15-23
-
Immigration and Social Aspects of Sustainable Development. The Case of Germany
Paweł Rydzewski25-31
-
Achieving Sustainable Competitive Advantage Through Intellectual Capital and Corporate Character: The Mediating Role of Innovation
Huan Xiao, Dengke Yu33-45
-
Ethics of Sustainable Development from the View of A. Badiou’s Critique of Contemporary Ethics
Andrzej Papuziński47-52
-
Ecological Performance: Ethnic Fragmentation versus Governance Quality and Sustainable Development
Viktor Koziuk, Yuryi Hayda, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi, Serhii Kozlovskyi53-64
-
The Theoretical Foundations of Management in Terms of the Implementation of the Process of Globalization and Sustainable Development in the Real Sphere
Franciszek Piontek65-69
-
Does Appearance of the Migrants Change Citizens Perception of the Public Space? Case Study of Disturbed Sustainability, Belgrade, Serbia
Nataša Danilović Hristić, Nebojša Stefanović71-80
-
Consumption and Sustainable Development: Ethical Aspects
Maria Miczyńska-Kowalska81-88
-
The Role of Language in Sustainable Development: Multilingualism and Language Literacy in India
Neha Toppo, Mojibur Rahman89-93
-
Value Theory in the Economics of Sustainable Development
Małgorzata Pink95-102
-
Women’s Attitude Towards Environment Sustainability Through Natural Preservation
Jyoti Kumari, Ajit Kumar Behura, Sarita Kar103-107
-
The Impact of Selected Biotechnology Processes for Sustainable Development of the Environment and Human Life
Aleksandra Badora, Magdalena Celińska109-117
-
Surveys as Means of Understanding User-behaviour with Respect to Energy Usage in Households, Prior to Decision-making to Promote Sustainability
G Venkatesh, Are Kjeang119-134
-
Sustainable Habitat as the Main Factor of Urbanization Development: 19th-20th Centuries
Azizov Aghasalim135-148
-
A Comprehensive Approach: Inclusive, Smart and Green Urban Development
Justyna Przywojska, Aldona Podgórniak-Krzykacz149-160
-
Corporate Sustainability Practices in Polluting Industries: Evidence from India, China and USA
Prem Sagar Mishra, Ajay Kumar, Niladri Das161-168
-
The Possibility of Using Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L. var. Napus) for Energy Purposes
Jakub Siemek, Jan Macuda, Łukasz Łukańko, Jakub Nowak, Tadeusz Zając167-177
-
Reconsidering Land System Changes in Borderlands: Insights from the China-ASEAN Borderland
Xiaobo Hua, Yasuyuki Kono179-187
-
NER300: Success or Failure of Public Support for Low-emission Technologies?
Grażyna Borys189-196
-
The Identification of the Luhansk Region and the Region Act’s According to the Qualification of Their Sustainable Development in the Conditions of the Joint Forces Operation
Inna Zablodska, Svitlana Hrechana, Daria Zablodska197-210
-
Sustainable Development Goals in Arab Region – United Arab Emirates’ Case Study
Adam Krzymowski211-220
-
Theatre for Sustainable Development: Jana Sanskriti’s Participatory Ideologue and Practice
Shubhra Ghoshal, Nirban Manna221-227
-
Risk and Uncertainty in Sustainable Development: Undertaking Politics of the Climate Change in the United States
Olena Ovchynnikova229-235
Archives
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The Paris Agreement of December 2015 set a very ambitious target for the global reduction of greenhouse gases. Its implementation means the need to transform the global economy, including the European one, towards the economy characterised by the neutral level of these gases emission. Such transformation will not be possible without the dynamic development of breakthrough technological innovations on a large scale, which requires significant financial support from the public sector. This support should be primarily focused on the demonstration phase of the innovation process, which frequently turns into the so-called technological death valley. Demonstration projects are not commercial products as yet, they are characterized by untested technical reliability and the risk of no demand for products manufactured using new technologies. Therefore, private investors are not entirely willing to invest in them. In 2009 the European Union, in order to avoid the death valley, launched, through the promising innovative low-emission technologies, the NER300 programme – one of the world’s largest programmes supporting the supply of low-carbon commercial technologies, as one of the components of the Emissions Trading System – ETS. This programme is the subject of the presented article. Its purpose is to provide answers to three basic questions: 1) did the programme end with a success or a failure?; 2) what external and internal reasons determined the results of the programme?; 3) should the programme become a systemic element of the EU ETS?
The article presents the results of NER300 and their interpretation in the context of the programme’s objectives. The research covering the reasons which determined the results of the programme used the existing subject literature on the NER300 programme and the special report issued by the European Court of Auditors presenting these results as well as the selected European Union documents and normative acts.
Keywords:
References
ÅHMAN M., SKJEAERSETH J.B., EIKELAND P.O., 2018, Demonstrating climate mitigation technologies: An early assessment of the NER300 programme, in: Energy Policy, 117, p. 100-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.032
BOASSON E.L., WETTESTAD J., 2014, Policy invention and entrepreneurship: Bankrolling the burying of carbon in the EU, in: Global Environmental Change, 29, p. 404-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.010
BOSSINK B.G., 2015, Demonstration projects for diffusion of clean technological innovation: a review, in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17, p. 1409-1427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0879-4
BROECKS K.P.F., VAN EGMOND S., VAN RIJNSOEVER F.J., VERLINDE-VAN DEN BERG M., HEKKERT M.P., 2016, Persuasiveness, importance and novelty of arguments about Carbon Capture and Storage, in: Environmental Science & Policy, 59, p. 58-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.004
CHIAVARI J., 2010, The legal framework for carbon and capture and storage in the EU (Directive 2009/31/EC), in: New Climate Policies of the European Union, eds Oberthur, S., Kelly, C.R., Pallemaerts, M., VUB Press, Brussels.
EC, 2010, Commission decision 2010/670/EU of 3 November 2010 laying down criteria and measures for the financing of commercial demonstration projects that aim at the environmentally safe capture and geological storage of CO2 as well as demonstration projects of innovative renewable energy technologies under the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community established by Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, in: OJ L, 290(39), 6.11.2010.
EC, 2010, Communication from the Commission Europe, A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010) 2020 final, Brussels, 3.3.2010, COM (2014) 15 final, Brussels, 22.1.2014.
EC, 2014, A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030, COM (2014) 15 final, Brussels, 22.1.2014.
EC, 2015, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Climate action progress report, including the report on the functioning of the European carbon market and the report on the revieu of Directive 2009/31/EC on the geological storage of carbon dioxide, COM(2015) 576 final, Brussels, 18.11.2015.
EC, 2018 a, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and European Investment Bank. A Clean Planet for all European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy, COM (2018) 773 final, Brussels, 28.11.2018.
EC, 2018b, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council UE and the Paris Climate Agreement: Taking stock of progress at Katowice COP, COM (2018) 716 final, Brussels, 26.2018.
ECA, 2018, Demonstrating carbon capture and storage and innovative renewables at commercial scale in the EU: intended progress not achieved in the past decade, in: Special Report No 24, ECA.
EC, 2009, Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the community, in: OJ L, 140(63), 5.6.2009.
EU, 2018b, Directive (EU) 2018/410 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2018 amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments, and decision (EU) 2015/1814, in: OJ L, 76(3), 19.3.2018.
FALLMANN H., HELLER C., SEUSS J., VOOGT M., RIEDEL A., 2015, The NER 300 Funding, in: Evalluation of the EU ETS Directive carried out within the project ‘Support for the Review of the EU Emissions Trading System’. EU Commission & Environment Agency, Vienna.
FRISHAMMAR J., SODERHOLM P., BACKSTROM K., HELLSMARK H., YLINENPAA H., 2014, The role of pilot and demonstration plants in technological development: Synthesis and directions for future research, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 27, p. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.943715
HENDRY CH., HARBONE P., 2011, Changing the view of wind power development: more than bricolage, in: Research Policy, 40(5), p. 778-789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.001
JEŻOWSKI P., 2017, O niektórych problemach gospodarki niskoemisyjnej, in: Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 1, p. 45-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33119/KSzPP.2017.1.3
LUPION M., HERZOG H.J., 2013, NER 300: lessons learnt in attempting to secure CCS projects in Europe, in: Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 9, p. 19-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.08.009
NEMET G.F., ZIPPERER V., KRAUS M., 2018, The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects, in: Energy Policy, 119, p.154-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.008
RADAGEN P., IRONS R., SCHOENMAKERS H., 2013. Too early or too late for CCS – what needs to be done to overcome the valley of death for Carbon Capture and Storage in Europe, in: Energy Procedia, 37, p. 6189-6201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.548
SAHAL D., 1985, Technological guideposts and innovation avenues, in: Research Policy, 14(2), p. 61-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90015-0
SCOTT V., 2013, What can we expect from Europe’s Carbon capture and storage demonstrations? View Point, in: Energy Policy, 54, p. 66-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.026
SKJAERSETH J.B., WETTESTAD J., 2010, The EU emissions trading system revisited, Directive 2009/29/EC, in: The New Climate Policies of the European Union, eds Oberthur, S., Kelly, C.R., Pallemaerts, M., VUB Press, Brussels.
SUMMARY REPORT, 2017, Finance for innovation: towards the ETS Innovation Fund, https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/events/docs/0115/20170612_report_en.pdf (30.12.2018).
UNFCCC/CP/2015/L.9, 2015, Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris, https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/109r01.pdf (5.02.2019).
Article Details
Abstract views: 116
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
