Clarifying a Circularity Phenomenon in a Circular Economy under the Notion of Potential
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 16 No. 1 (2021)
-
COVID-Induced Investor Sentiments and Market Reaction under Extreme Meteorological Conditions: Evidence from Clean Energy Sector of Asia-Pacific
Farzan Yahya, Zhang Shaohua, Muhammad Waqas, Zhengde Xiong7-15
-
Determinants of COVID-19 Death Rate in Europe: Empirical Analysis
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Daria Bilenko, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi, Serhii Vitvitskyi, Olha Bondarenko, Oleksandr Korniichuk17-28
-
Environmental Quality, Corruption and Industry Growth: The Global Perspective
Min Cui, Jun-Sheng Wang, Chun-Ping Chang29-37
-
Reflection on the Human Living Environment in Connection with Sustainable Development
Wiesław Sztumski39-44
-
An Ecocritical Reading of T.S. Eliot: An Approach Towards Sustainable Development
Archana Verma, Rajni Singh45-49
-
A Text-Mining Approach to the Evaluation of Sustainability Reporting Practices: Evidence from a Cross-Country Study
Ajay Kumar, Niladri Das51-60
-
Social Aspects of Energy Production from Renewable Sources
Wojciech Czekała, Filip Tarkowski, Patrycja Pochwatka61-66
-
Impact Analysis of Renewable Energy based Generation in West Africa – A case study of Nigeria
Temitope M. Adeyemi-Kayode, Sanjay Misra, Robertas Damaševičius67-78
-
Clarifying a Circularity Phenomenon in a Circular Economy under the Notion of Potential
Tetiana Shevchenko, Roman Vavrek, Yuriy Danko, Olena Gubanova, Jana Chovancová, Liubov Mykhailova79-89
-
Decision-making Process in the Systemic Strategy for Environmental Protection
Grzegorz Embros91-101
-
Positioning of the Amalgamated Territorial Communities of Ukraine through the Sustainable Development in the Conditions of Military Actions
Iryna Budnikevich, Olena Kolomytseva, Yuliia Rohozian, Inga Krupenna, Daria Zablodska103-112
-
Systematic Review on Ecosystem Services (ES) of Ecotourism in South-East Asia (ASEAN)
Azlan Abas, Kadaruddin Aiyub, Nor Azizan Idris113-121
-
Sociology and Sustainable Development. The Most Important Areas of Interdisciplinary Research
Paweł Rydzewski123-131
-
Cantrang: A Dilemma in Policy Implementation (Case in Lampung Bay, Indonesia)
Indra Gumay Febryano, Supono, Abdullah Aman Damai, Debi Hardian, Gunardi Djoko Winarno, Novita Tresiana133-142
-
Research on the Green Competitiveness Index of Manufacturing Industry in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu143-156
-
Institutional Conditions for Strengthening the Position of Organic Farming as a Component of Sustainable Development
Władysława Łuczka157-164
-
The Effect of Air Pollution on Fertility Intentions
Yunrong Li165-170
-
Sustainable Development Goals – Quo Vadis, Cities of the World?
G Venkatesh171-179
-
Munda Tribe Perception Towards Livelihood Through Sustainable Development
Laxmi Kumari, Mojibur Rahman181-185
-
An Implication of Buddhist Ethical Teaching on Sustainable Development
Gyan Prakash187-191
-
Underground Spaces: a Step Towards Sustainable Development in Khuzestan Province, Iran
Sohrab Ghaedi193-200
-
Role of Ethical Leaders in Sustainable Business: An Aristotelian Virtue Ethics Perspective
Purnima Lenka, Sarita Kar201-207
-
Influence of Pollutants from Transport on Life Expectancy in the EU Countries
Hana Rozehnalová, Michal Mádr, Lucie Formanová, Břetislav Andrlík209-217
-
The Contributions of Demographic Factors to Economic Growth
Mykola Pasichnyi, Anton Nepytaliuk219-229
Archives
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2020-07-01 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2020-01-02 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Turning from linear to circular business model, from cradle-to-grave to cradle-to-cradle and from waste to wealth, the concept of circular economy (CE) has become an important tool to promote sustainable development as it combines economic, environmental and social benefits at a local as well as global scale. In the shift towards CE, examining the CE from the perspective of its potential is crucial for its wider and more effective implementation in the practice. The aim of the paper is to clarify a circularity phenomenon in closed-loop econ-omy under the notion of potential in part of (1) the structural elements, (2) underlying categories and (3) basal properties as a follow-up to the previous studies about managing the circularity potential. The study provides the theoretical framework for understanding circularity potential by developing the circularity potential categorization in order to get a comprehensive picture of what has been done in the past and where efforts are most need today to achieve a progress towards circularity in the future. The basal properties of circularity potential such as integrity, dynamism, territorial affiliation and different strategies compatibility were revealed and discussed for managing the circularity potential. The findings of the paper have ambition to contribute to new metrics development to measure the progress towards zero-waste and CE aimed at identification and monitoring all the possible forms of the circularity potential – opportunities, reserves, available resources, rather than the available resources only that were primarily considered in the past attempts at the operationalisation of circular economy.
Keywords:
References
ALLWOOD J.M., CULLEN J.M., CARRUTH M.A., 2012, Sustainable materials: With both eyes open, UIT Cambridge Ltd, Cambridge.
BLOMSMA F., BRENNAN G., 2017, The Emergence of Circular Economy A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 603-614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603
BOCKEN N. M. P., OLIVETTI E. A., CULLEN J. M., POTTING J., LIFSET R., 2017, Taking the Circularity to the Next Level, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 476-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12606
BOCKEN N. M. P., PAUW I., BAKKER C., GRINTEN B., 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, in: Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33, p. 308-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
BOCKEN N. M. P., SHORT S. W., RANA P., EVANS S., 2014, A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, p. 42–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
BRAUNGART M., MCDONOUGH W., BOLLINGER A., 2007, Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13-14), p. 1337-1348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003
BRIDGENS B., POWELL M., FARMER G., WALSH C., REED E., ROYAPOOR M., GOSLING P., HALL J., 2017, Framework for Implementing the Principles of the Circular Economy in Organizations–Guide, The British Standards Institution, London.
CIRCULAR ACADEMY, 2017, Circular Economy: Some Definitions, http://www.circular.academy/circular-economy-some-definitions/ (10.11.2019).
COX J., GRITH S., GIORGI, S., KING G., 2013, Consumer understanding of product lifetimes, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 79, p. 21-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.05.003
DEN HOLLANDER M.C., BAKKER C. A., HULTINK E. J., 2017, Product Design in a Circular Economy: Development of a Typology of Key Concepts and Terms, in: Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), p. 517-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12610
Decision No. 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 ‘Living well, within the limits of our planet’, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013D1386&from =EN (10.11.2019).
DOMENECH T., BLEISCHWITZ R., DORANOVA A., PANAYOTOPOULOS D., ROMAN R., 2019, Mapping Industrial Symbiosis Development in Europe typologies of networks, characteristics, performance and contribution to the Circular Economy, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, p. 76–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.016
ELIA V., GNONI M. G., TORNESE F., 2016, Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), p. 2741-2751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196
ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION AND GRANTA, 2015, Circularity indicators. An approach to measuring circularity. Methodology, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2013a, Towards the circular economy. Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2013b, Towards the circular economy. Opportunities for the consumers goods sector, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
ELLEN MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 2014, Towards the circular economy. Accelerating the scaleup across supply chains, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Medina.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2015, Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614 (15.10.2019).
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2018, A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1516265440535&uri=COM:2018:28:FIN (10.11.2019).
FRANKLIN-JOHNSON E., FIGGE F., CANNING L., 2016, Resource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy performance, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, p. 589-598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.023
GEISSDOERFER M., SAVAGET P., BOCKEN N., HULTINK E., 2017, The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, p. 757-768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
GLADYSHEV N. G., 2013, Scientific basics of recycling in techno-natural waste management clusters, Samara University, Samara.
GUBANOVA E. R., 2009, The mechanism of economic and environmental incentives for the use of secondary resources, OSEU, Odessa.
JAWAHIR I. S., BRADLEY R., 2016, Technological Elements of Circular Economy and the Principles of 6R-Based Closed-loop Material Flow in Sustainable Manufacturing, in: Procedia CIRP, 40, p. 103-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.067
KAUTISH P., PAUL J., SHARMA R., 2019, The moderating influence of environmental consciousness and recycling intentions on green purchase behavior, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, p. 1425-1436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.389
KOMAR I., 1975, Rational use of natural resources and resource cycles, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow.
KRONENBERG J., WINKLER R., 2009, Wasted waste: An evolutionary perspective on industrial byproducts, in: Ecological Economics, 68(12), p. 3026-3033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.006
MONT O., PLEPYS A., WHALEN K., NUBHOLZ J. L. K., 2017, Business model innovation for a Circular Economy: Drivers and barriers for the Swedish industry – the voice of REES companies, Mistra REES, Linkoping.
MONT O., HEISKANEN E-K., 2015, Breaking the stalemate of sustainable consumption with industrial ecology and a circular economy, in: Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption, Reisch L. and Thøgersen J., Edward Edgar, Cheltenham, p. 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471270.00009
MURRAY A., SKENE K. HAYNES K., 2015, The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), p. 369-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2
NETO J. Q. F., BLOEMHOF J., CORBETT C., 2016, Market prices of remanufactured, used and new items: Evidence from eBay, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 171, p. 371-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.006
PARK H. J., LIN L. M., 2018, Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products, in: Journal of Business Research, (in press).
PARK J. Y., CHERTOW M. R., 2014, Establishing and testing the ‘reuse potential’ indicator for managing wastes as resources, in: Journal of Environmental Management, 137, p. 45-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.053
PAULIUK S., 2018, Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations, in: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, p. 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.019
PETRUSHENKO M., SHEVCHENKO H., 2013, Management of ecological-economical conflicts within the framework of the theory of optimal mechanisms for resource distribution, in: Actual Problems of Economics, 141(3), p. 186-192.
PIERONI M., MCALOONE T., PIGOSSO D., 2019, Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches, in: Journal of DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036
Cleaner Production, 215, p. 98-216.
PISCICELLI L., LUDDEN G. D. S., COOPER T., 2018, What makes a sustainable business model successful? An empirical comparison of two peer-topeer goods-sharing platforms, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, p. 4580-4591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.170
POTTING J., KROEZE C., 2010, Cradle to cradle: Old wine or new spirits?, in: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 6(2), p. 315-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.42
PROKOPENKO O.V., KYSLY V.M., SHEVCHENKO H.M., 2014, Peculiarities of the natural resources economic estimation under the transformational conditions, in: Economic Annals-XXI, 7–8(1), p. 40-43.
RASHID A., ASIF F.M.A., KRAJNIK P., NICOLESCU C.M., 2013, Resource Conservative Manufacturing: an essential change in business and technology paradigm for sustainable manufacturing, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, p. 166-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.012
SHEVCHENKO T., KRONENBERG J., 2017, Management of material cyclicity potential: example of electrical and electronic products, in: Research in Design Series, 9, p. 377-381.
SHEVCHENKO T., KRONENBERG J., 2020, Management of material and product circularity potential as an approach to operationalise circular economy, in: Progress in Industrial Ecology An International Journal, 14(1), p. 30-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/PIE.2020.105193
SKENE K. R., 2017, Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work, Sustainability Science, 13(2), p. 479-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0443-3
STAHEL W., 2010, The Performance Economy, Palgrave-MacMillan, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274907
VELIS C. A, BRUNNER P. H., 2013, Recycling and resource efficiency: it is time for a change from quantity to quality, Waste Management and Research, 31(6), p. 539-540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13489782
WEELDEN E., MUGGE R., BAKKER C., 2016, Paving the way towards circular consumption: exploring consumer acceptance of refurbished mobile phones in the Dutch market, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, p. 743-754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.065
WEBSTE K., 2015, The Circular Economy: A Wealth of Flows, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Isle of Wight.
ZENG X., LI J., SINGH N., 2014, Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Battery: A Critical Review, in: Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 44(10), p. 1129-1165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.763578
Article Details
Abstract views: 240
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
