Role of Ethics in Nature-Human Relationship: a Pragmatic Inquiry
Anita Jena
anitajena44@gmail.comIndian Institute of Technology (ISM), Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dhanbad, India (India)
Abstract
Primitive people, in their initial struggle for existence, must have found Nature to be a formidable force to reckon with. Our ancestors eked out their means of survival from the abundant bounties of the ancient world with the meager tools at their disposal and sometimes tried to placate Nature by worshipping her. The earth was a rich mother and the needs of the early people were few. With time the ever increasing demands of humankind were matched by their growing power to wreak destruction and havoc. They destroyed forests and dug into the earth with unrestricted abandon in the quest of greater wealth and enjoyment, slaughtered every type of life for food and even for the mere pleasure of killing. Human beings remain the only predator that kills the young adults of a species, damaging the reproductive capital of the latter. Philosophers have argued against the wanton destruction of the earth’s resources. That these warnings have been largely ignored is apparent in the danger signs that have started to raise a question mark on the future of life on this planet. Therefore, these ethical theories are needed to be analyzing in a pragmatic point of view of their applications. The tendency of the theories is to concentrate on the former and take the latter for granted. This creates a gap between knowledge and application of environmental ethics. There must be some aspects other than worldviews that affects human behavior. We proceed with a pragmatic theory of ethics which takes into account the practical aspects and strengthen it further with a psychological probe into the aspects responsible for creating the gap.
Keywords:
environmental ethics, environmental behavior and habits, ethical theories, pragmatism, pragmatic environmental ethicsReferences
BATAVIA C., NELSON M. P., 2017, For goodness sake! What is intrinsic value and why should we care?, Biological Conservation, 209: 366-376.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.003
Google Scholar
BERENGUER J., 2010, The effect of empathy in environmental moral reasoning, Environment and Behavior, 42(1): 110-134.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508325892
Google Scholar
BOOTH K. J., 2012, Environmental Pragmatism and Bioregionalism, Contemporary Pragmatism, 9(1): 67.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-90000217
Google Scholar
BRENNAN A., LO N., 2002, Environmental ethics, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-environmental/;
Google Scholar
BRUNCKHORST D. J., 2013, Bioregional planning: resource management beyond the new millennium, Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315080024
Google Scholar
BRYSON J. M., 2018, Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustain-ing organizational achievement, John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
CURRY P., 2011, Ecological ethics: An introduction, Polity.
Google Scholar
DE WAAL F. B., 1999, Anthropomorphism and anthropodenial: consistency in our thinking about humans and other animals, Philosophical topics, 27(1), 255-280.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics199927122
Google Scholar
FLEER M., PRAMLING N., PRAMLING N., 2015, Learning and metaphor: Bridging the gap between the familiar and the unfamiliar, A Cultural-Historical Study of Children Learning Science: Foregrounding Affective Imagination in Play-based Settings, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9370-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9370-4
Google Scholar
GARE A., 2006, Postmodernism and the environmental crisis, Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203022122
Google Scholar
GARNER R., 2013, A theory of justice for animals: Animal rights in a nonideal world, Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936311.001.0001
Google Scholar
HARGROVE E. C., 1992, Weak anthropocentric intrinsic value, The Monist, 75(2): 183-207.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19927529
Google Scholar
LO A. Y., SPASH, C. L., 2013, Deliberative monetary valuation: in search of a democratic and value plural approach to environmental policy, Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(4): 768-789.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00718.x
Google Scholar
LUFF P., 2018, Early childhood education for sustainability: origins and inspirations in the work of John Dewey, Educa-tion 3-13, 46(4): 447-455.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2018.1445484
Google Scholar
MEDINA M., 2007, The world's scavengers: salvaging for sustainable consumption and production, Rowman Altamira.
Google Scholar
NUYEN A. T., 2011, Confucian role-based ethics and strong environmental ethics, Environmental Values, 20(4): 549-566.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327111X13150367351375
Google Scholar
REDDY M., 1979, The conduit metaphor, Metaphor and thought, 2: 285-324.
Google Scholar
RENDALL D., 2021, Aping language: Historical perspectives on the quest for semantics, syntax, and other rarefied prop-erties of human language in the communication of primates and other animals, Frontiers in psychology, 12: 675172.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675172
Google Scholar
SARKAR I., BEHURA A., 2018, Bioregionalism: Practical Environmental Ethics with an Underlying Pragmatic Ide-al, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 13(2)2018: 177-184.
Google Scholar
SCHEESE D. F., 1991, Inhabitors of the Wild: Henry David Thoreau, John Muir, Aldo Leopold, and Edward Abbey, The University of Iowa.
Google Scholar
SINGER P. (Ed.)., 2013, A companion to ethics, John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
SANDSTRA T., 1999, A Framework for the Love of Nature: Henry David Thoreau's Construction of the Wild in Walden and the Gift as an Ethos for Architecture, https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/ks65hf03k.
Google Scholar
USBORNE D., WALKER T., 2015, Obama reveals new climate change initiative: ‘We only get one planet. There is no Plan B’, Independent, August 4, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/obama-reveals-new-climate-change-initiative-weonly-get-one-planet-there-is-no-plan-b-10436273.html.
Google Scholar
Authors
Anita Jenaanitajena44@gmail.com
Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dhanbad, India India
Statistics
Abstract views: 119PDF downloads: 314