Examining the Relationship between Globalization and Sustainable Migration in OECD Countries
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)
-
The Journal Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development as a Polish Platform for International Interdisciplinary Scientific Discourse
Artur Pawłowski1-5
-
From Environmental Ethics to Sustainability Ethics
Hong Du6-14
-
The Role of Christianity in Ecological Awakening: Foundations for Christians' Sustainable Behavior Toward Nature
Ryszard Sadowski15-24
-
Gandhian Interpretation of the Bhagavad Gita: A Solution to Sustainable Living
Namarta Sharma25-33
-
Values Orientation Change – an Important Prerequisite for the Development of a Sustainable Economy
Eva Pechociakova Svitacova34-42
-
Assessing Sustainable Development Performance and Alternative Concepts in a Group of Developed Countries in Europe
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser43-73
-
Resilience after COVID-19: A Global Review of Recovery Strategies and their impact on Demographic and Economic Sectors
Jhoana Romero, Monica Mesa, Cesar Minoli, Juan Aristizabal74-95
-
Digital Inequality and Sustainable Development
Pawel Rydzewski96-108
-
Digital Trade and Regional Economic Resilience: A Case Study from China
Paijie Wan, Feng He109-128
-
Examining the Relationship between Globalization and Sustainable Migration in OECD Countries
Mehmet Şükrü Nar, Mehmet Nar129-142
-
Estimating the Role of Economic Globalization, Technological Development and Household Consumption on Ecological Footprint in Visegrad Countries
Orhan Cengiz, Fatma İdil Baktemur, Meltem Canoglu143-158
-
Relationship Between Organic Farmland Expansion and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Ivan Zayukov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, Oleksandr Tregubov, Sviatoslav Storchak, Viktor Mishchenko, Ruslan Lavrov159-173
-
Spatiotemporal Distribution of the Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on NDVI in China
Shuyi Dong, Wen Zhuang, Shuting Zhang, Shanshan Xie174-189
-
How Economic and Monetary Policy Uncertainty Affect Climate Policy Uncertainty in the United States?
Ahmet Tayfur Akcan, Muhammad Shahbaz, Cuneyt Kılıç, Hasan Kazak190-207
-
A Framework for Modeling the Decarbonization of the Economy Based on Energy Innovations in the Context of Industry 5.0 and Sustainable Development: International Perspective
Maryna Kravchenko, Kateryna Kopishynska, Olena Trofymenko, Ivan Pyshnograiev, Kateryna Boiarynova207-220
-
Assessing the Level of Energy Security of China: Evidence from TOPSIS-entropy Weight Method
Li Pan221-235
-
Sustainable Development through Geothermal Energy: Findings from Germany, Italy, Turkey, Iceland and France
Ignas Mikalauskas, Gabija Stanislovaitytė236-244
-
Impact of Climate Change on Women’s Political Empowerment: The Sustainable Development Perspective
Chun-Ling Ding, Yan Ma, Guo-Hua Ni, Chun-Ping Chang245-260
-
Women's Leadership in Accelerating Sustainable Development : Care Based Approach for Transformative Change
Purnima Lenka, Diptiranjan Khatua261-270
-
Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in SAARC Countries
Jai Kumar, Chen Xi, Joti Kumari, Jinyan Huang271-287
-
Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Asia: The Role of Political Institutions and Natural Resources
Li Guo, Romanus Osabohien, Armand Fréjuis Akpa Akpa, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan288-309
-
Impact of Multidimensional Distance on Financial Cooperation: A Case Study of China and Neighboring Countries
Fuchang Li, Han Wang, Xiaohui Hu, Wenli Ding310-328
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between migrant stock and economic-political-social globalization index values. The study uses annual data from the United Nations Migration Report, International Migration Statistics, International Migration Report and KOF globalization index for 27 OECD countries for the period 2012-2022. In the study, the sustainable migration relationship and globalization data in OECD countries are analyzed with the panel ARDL method. According to the results of the analysis, a 1% increase in economic globalization in the long run increases the migration burden of countries by 0.60%. Similarly, a 1% increase in political globalization increases the migration burden of countries by 0.06%. A 1% increase in social globalization decreases the migration burden of countries by 0.48%. The findings show that reducing social differences between countries has a decreasing effect on the migration burden of countries. However, as economic and political globalization increases, the migration burden also increases. In an economically and politically globalized world, focusing on increasing social equity and justice to manage the migration burden will contribute to the creation of more balanced and sustainable migration policies.
Keywords:
References
1. ABADAN-UNAT N., 2002, Bitmeyen Göç: Konuk İşçilikten Ulus-Ötesi Yurttaşlığa, Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
2. ACHTERBERG P., HOUTMAN D., 2006, Why do so Many People Vote ‘Unnaturally’ ? A Cultural Explanation for Voting Behaviour. European Journal of Political Research 45(1): 75-92, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00291.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00291.x
3. ADIGÜZEL Y., 2021, Küreselleşme Çağında Göç Ders Notları, İstanbul Üniversitesi AUE Fakültesi Yayınları.
4. AKYILDIZ I.E., 2016, Göç Teorilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi, Uludağ Journal of Economy and Society / U.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 35(2):, 127-176.
5. ALAKUŞ E., UZAN Y., 2020, İnsan Ticaretine Konu Olma Potansiyeli Bakımından Türkiye’nin Afgan Düzensiz Göçmen Gerçeği, Göç Araştırmaları Dergisi 6(1), 92-117, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gad/issue/55181/757003.
6. BERRIANE M., HAAS H., NATTER K., 2016, Revisiting Moroccan Migrations, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619897
7. BOERI T., BRUCKER H., 2005, Migration, Co-ordination Failures and EU Enlargement, Discussion Paper No. 1600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.728963
8. BORJAS G., 1987, Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants. American Economic Review 77(4): 531-553, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1814529.
9. BORJAS G., FREEMAN R., KATZ L., 1991, On the Labor Market Effects of Immigration and Trade, NBER, https://www.nber.org/papers/w3761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w3761
10. BORJAS G., 1999, Immigration. The Reporter: No. 4, National Bureau of Economic Research, https://www.nber.org/reporter/fall-1999/immigration.
11. BOUBTANE E., CAULIBALY D., RAULT C., 2013, Immigration, Unemployment and GDP in the Host Country: Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis on OECD Countries, Economing Modelling 33(1): 261-269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.017
12. BREUSCH S., PAGAN R., 1980, The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics, The Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 239-253, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
13. CASTLES S., 2002, Migration and Community Formation Under Conditions of Globalization, The International Migration Review, 36(4): 1143-1168, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4149495?origin=JSTOR-pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2002.tb00121.x
14. CASTLES S., MILLER M.J., 2008, Göçler Çağı: Modern Dünyada Uluslararası Göç Hareketleri, Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. İstanbul, Türkiye.
15. CLEMENS M.A., 2011, Economics and Emigration: Trillion-Dollar Bills on the Sidewalk?, Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3): 83-106, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.3.83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.3.83
16. COLEMAN D., 2015, Migrants and migration in Europe. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780080970875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.31122-9
17. COLIC-PEISKER V., 2017, Globalization and Migration, Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, ed. Farazmand: 1-7, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3130-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3130-1
18. CZAIKA M., de HAAS H., 2014, The Globalization of Migration: Hasthe World Become More Migratory?, International Migration Review 48(2): 283-323, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24542790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12095
19. ÇALDIRAN T., 2023, İzlanda Göçmenlik Şartlar ve İzlanda'da Göçmen Olmak, https://vizem.net/izlanda/gocmenlik/ (08.11.2023).
20. ÇEŞTEPE H., 2012, Türkiye’nin Seçilmiş Ortadoğu Ülkeleriyle Ticaretinin Analizi, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergis 8(2) 23-43.
21. de HAAS H., CZAIKA M., FLAHAUX M.L., MAHENDRA E., NATTER K., VEZZOLI S., VILLARES-VARELA M., 2019, International Migration: Trends, Determinants, and Policy Effects, Population and Development Review 45(4): 885-922, https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12291
22. DOKOS T., 2017, Migration and Globalization– Forms, Patterns and Effects. Background Paper, Trilogue Salzburg: 102-114, https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/Faktencheck/Leaders__Dialogues/Salzburger_Trilog_2017/7_Migration_and_Globalization.pdf.
23. ENDERWICK P., 2006, Globalization and Labor, Chelsea House Publishers, Philadelphia.
24. FERTIG M., KAHANEC M., 2015, Projections of Potential Flows to the Enlarging EU from Ukraine, Croatia and other Eastern Neighbors,. IZA Journal of Migration 4(6): 3-27, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40176-015-0029-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40176-015-0029-8
25. FRANK T., 2018, Paul Krugman Got the Working Class Wrong. That Had Consequences, The Guardian 01.10.2018, https://www.americanproject.org/paul-krugman-got-working-class-wrong-consequences/.
26. GAVONEL M., ADGER W.,CAMPOS R., BOYD E., CARR E., FABOS A., FRANSEN S., 2021, The Migration-Sustainability Paradox: Transformations in Mobile Worlds, Environmental Sustainability 49(1): 98-109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.013
27. GFMD, 2024, Global Process on Migration. Global Forum on Migration and Development, https://www.iom.int/global-forum-migration-and-development-gfmd.
28. GIB., 2021, Kitlesel Akınlar, Göç İdaresi Başkanlığı, T.C İçişleri Bakanlığı. https://www.goc.gov.tr/kitlesel-akinlar.
29. GIDDENS A., 1991, The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
30. GILPIN R.G., 2001, Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order, Princeton University Press, Princenton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831272
31. GIOVANNI J., ORTEGA F., LEVCHENKO A., 2015, A Global View of Cross-Border Migration, Journal of the European Economic Association 13(1): 168-202, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24539137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12110
32. GOMEZ G., GIRALDEZ O., 2017, The Causality Between Economic Growth and Immigration in EU/EFTA Member States, Working Papers No 1701.
33. GÖV A., DÜRRÜ Z., 2017, Göç ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Seçilmiş OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz, Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 3(4): 491-502, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ead/issue/48244/610735.
34. GÜÇ Y., 2023. Sümerlerin Uğradığı Felakete Uğrayabiliriz, Adana Toros Gazetesi, https://adanatorosgazetesi.net/sumerlerin-ugradigi-felakete-ugrayabiliriz/.
35. GYGLI S., HAELG F., POTRAFKE N., STURM E., 2019, The KOF Globalisation Index, The Review of International Organizations 14(3): 543-574, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
36. HATTON T.J., 2014, The economics of international migration: A short history of the debate, Labour Economics 30(1): 43-50, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537114000797?via%3Dihub. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.06.006
37. HIGHAM J., 1955, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism 1860-1925, Rutgers University Press.
38. HOFFMANN S., 1960, Contemporary Theory in International Relations, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New York.
39. ILO., 2021a, Extending Social Protection to Migrant Workers, Refugees and Their Families, International Labour Organization, Geneva.
40. ILO., 2021b, Global Estimates on International Migrant Workers–Results and Methodology, Report.
41. IMMIGRATION ADMINISTRATION PRESIDENCY., 2023, GFMD-Global Forum for Migration and Development, Turkish Ministry of Internal Affairs, https://www.goc.gov.tr/gfmd--kuresel-goc-ve-kalkinma-forumu.
42. İÇDUYGU A., KEYMAN E. F., 2000, Globalization, Security and Migration: The Case of Turkey, Global Governance 6(1): 383-398, https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00603006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00603006
43. JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE, 2022, Annual Report: Hope Makes the Difference, Thomas H. Smolich SJ. www.jrs.net.
44. KALIA K., 2008, The Recession-Proof Race for Highly Skilled Migrants, MIR, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article.
45. KALKINMA BAKANLIĞI., 2018, Dış Göç Politikası. Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu: On Birinci Kalkınma Planı (2019-2023), Ankara.
46. KAUR A., 2010, Labour Migration Trends and Policy Challenges in Southeast Asia, Policy and Society 29(4): 385-397, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.09.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.09.001
47. KINMAN J.L., LEE E.S., 1966, Migration and Crime, The International Migration Digest 3(1): 7-14, https://doi.org/10.2307/3002915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019791836600300102
48. KOFMAN E., PHIZACKLEA A., RAGHURAM P., SALES R., 2000, Gender and International Migration in Europe: Employment, Welfare and Politics, Routledge, London.
49. KOSER K., 2018, International Migration: A Canary in the Coalmine of Globalisation, https://globalchallenges.ch/issue/3/international-migration-a-canary-in-the-coalmine-of-globalisation/.
50. KURT U., 2019, The Causal Effects of Economic, Political and Social Globalizatıon on Migrants: A Panel Data Analysis For Selected OECD Countries, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 17(1): 281-296. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.511544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.511544
51. LOWELL B.L., 2005, Trends in International Migration Flows and Stocks, 1975-2005, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers.
52. MASSEY D.S,. ESPINOSA K.E., 1997, What's Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis. American Journal of Sociology 102(4): 939-999, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2782024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231037
53. MEYERS E., 2000, Theories of International Immigration Policy - A Comparative Analysis. International Migration Review 34(4): 1245-1282, https://doi.org/10.1177/019791830003400407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019791830003400407
54. MIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE., 2023, Top 25 Destinations of International Migrants, International Migration Statistics: Trends over, https://www.migrationpolicy.org.
55. MOUNTZ A., 2020, The Many Facets of Pandemic Vulnerability, Open Democracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/pandemic-border/many-facets-pandemic-vulnerability/ (01.07.2023).
56. NAR M.Ş., 2020, The Covid-19 Pandemic and The Impact of Transformation: Now and Later, İmgelem 4(7): 363-382, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/imgelem/issue/58047/815350.
57. NAR M.Ş., 2021a, Globalization Process and Cross-Border Migration Movements: The Case of Turkey, Social Sciences Researches Journal 16(2) 214-225, https://doi.org/10.48145/gopsbad.1020128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48145/gopsbad.1020128
58. NAR M.Ş., 2021b, The Correlation Between Cultural Globalization and Internet and Cell Phone Use Rates: The Case of OECD Countries, International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences (IJOESS) 12(45): 752-765, http://dx.doi.org/10.35826/ijoess.2987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35826/ijoess.2987
59. NAR M.Ş., 2021c, The Relationship Between Education, Ideology, Democracy and Voting Behavior: The Case of Turkey, MECMUA International Journal of Social Science, 6(12): 199-212, https://doi.org/10.32579/mecmua.990437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32579/mecmua.990437
60. OECD., 2023, International Migration Outlook, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites.
61. OHMAE K., 1999, The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked World Economy, Harper Collins Publishers, New York.
62. PARK J., 2015, Europe's Migration Crisis, Council on Foreign Relations, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/europes-migration-crisis.
63. PAWŁOWSKI A., 2013, Sustainable Development and Globalization, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 8(2): 5-16, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2292396.
64. PAWŁOWSKI A., 2020a, Covid-19, Environmental Engineering and the End of the World as We Know it, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustaiınable Development 15(2): 7-14, https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/5095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.2.01
65. PAWŁOWSKI A., 2020b, Rozwój Zrownoważony – Idea, Filozofia, Praktyka, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw.
66. PESARAN M.H., 2004, General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panelsm Working Papers in Economics 0435, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.5113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504
67. PESARAN M.H., ULLAH A., YAMAGATA T., 2008, A Bias-adjusted LM Test of Error Cross-Section Independence, The Econometrics Journal, 11(1): 105-127, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
68. PIJNENBURG A., RIJKEN C., 2021, Moving Beyond Refugees and Migrants: Reconceptualising the Rights of People on the Move, Interventions, 23(2): 273-293, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1854107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1854107
69. PIORE S., JOSEPH M., 1979, Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511572210
70. RITZEN J., KAHANEC M., 2017, A Sustainable Immigration Policy for the EU, IZA Policy Paper Series No. 126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57723-4_6
71. SACD., 2023, Refugees: A Russian Weapon to Empty Syria and Flood Europe!, https://syacd.org/refugees-a-russian-weapon-to-empty-syria-and-flood-europe/.
72. SAFI M., 2023, Immigration Theory Between Assimilation and Discrimination, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50(1): 173-202, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2207250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2207250
73. SALIK R., 2023, İzlanda ile İlgili 10 Gerçek, https://www.milliyet.com.tr/molatik/galeri/izlanda-ile-ilgili-beyin-yakan-10-gercek-74296/1.
74. SALT J., 2009, Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series, Springer.
75. STOUFFER S.A., 1940, Intervening Opportunities: a Theory Relating Mobility and Distance, American Sociological Review 5(6): 845-867, https://doi.org/10.2307/2084520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2084520
76. TAHİROĞLU M., 2022, Immigration Politics: Refugees in Turkey and the 2023 Elections, Heinrich Böll Stiftung, https://us.boell.org/en/2022/08/17/immigration-politics-refugees-turkey-and-2023-elections.
77. TIMMER A.S., WILLIAMS J.G., 1998, Immigration Policy Prior to the 1930s: Labor Markets, Policy Interactions, and Globalization Backlash, Population and Development Review 24(4): 739-771, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2808023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2808023
78. TOIT M., 1990, People on the Move: Rural-urban Migration with Special Reference to the Third World: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Human Organization, 49(4): 305-319, https://www.jstor.org/stable/44126749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.49.4.016734370u13v727
79. TRIANDAFYLLIDOU A., 2018, Globalisation and Migration: An Introduction. in A. Triandafyllidou (ed.), Handbook of Migration and Globalisation, ed. Triandafyllidou, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham:1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367519.00006
80. UN, 2017, International Migration Report 2017, United Nations, New York.
81. UN-DESA., 2021, International Migration 2020 Highlights, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, https://www.un.org/en/desa/international-migration-2020-highlights.
82. UN, 2022, World Migration Report, International Organization for Migration, United Nations.
83. UN, 2023, Migration: Key Migration Terms, Internatıonal Organızatıon for Mıgratıon, https://www.iom.int/key-migration-terms.
84. VOWLES J., XEZONAKIS G., 2016, Globalization, Positional and Valence Politics, and the Global Financial Crisis, Globalization and Domestic Politics: Parties, Elections, and Public Opinion, ds. J. Vowles & G. Xezonakis, Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757986.001.0001
85. WADE R.H., 2014, The Piketty Phenomenon and the Future of Inequality, Real World Economics Review 69(7): 2-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7810/9781927277713_14
86. WALLERSTEIN I., 1974, The Modern World-System I Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, Academic Press.
87. WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM., 2017, Migration and Its Impact on Cities, The World Economic Forum Report, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/Migration_Impact_Cities_report_2017_low.pdf.
88. ZDANOWICZ M., 2023, The Migration Crisis on the Polish–Belarusian Border. Bialystok Legal Studies/ Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(1): 103-115, https://doi.org10.15290/bsp.2023.28.01.06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2023.28.01.06
89. ZELKA M., 1991, Ortadoğu Ülkelerinin İthalat Yapısının Ekononometrik Yapısı, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1): 111-116.
Article Details
Abstract views: 516

