Sustainable Development through Geothermal Energy: Findings from Germany, Italy, Turkey, Iceland and France

Ignas Mikalauskas; Gabija Stanislovaitytė

doi:10.35784/preko.6615

Open full text

PDF

Published: Jan 10, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6615

Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)

Articles

The Journal Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development as a Polish Platform for International Interdisciplinary Scientific Discourse
Artur Pawłowski

1-5
From Environmental Ethics to Sustainability Ethics
Hong Du

6-14
The Role of Christianity in Ecological Awakening: Foundations for Christians' Sustainable Behavior Toward Nature
Ryszard Sadowski

15-24
Gandhian Interpretation of the Bhagavad Gita: A Solution to Sustainable Living
Namarta Sharma

25-33
Values Orientation Change – an Important Prerequisite for the Development of a Sustainable Economy
Eva Pechociakova Svitacova

34-42
Assessing Sustainable Development Performance and Alternative Concepts in a Group of Developed Countries in Europe
Magdaléna Drastichová, Peter Filzmoser

43-73
Resilience after COVID-19: A Global Review of Recovery Strategies and their impact on Demographic and Economic Sectors
Jhoana Romero, Monica Mesa, Cesar Minoli, Juan Aristizabal

74-95
Digital Inequality and Sustainable Development
Pawel Rydzewski

96-108
Digital Trade and Regional Economic Resilience: A Case Study from China
Paijie Wan, Feng He

109-128
Examining the Relationship between Globalization and Sustainable Migration in OECD Countries
Mehmet Şükrü Nar, Mehmet Nar

129-142
Estimating the Role of Economic Globalization, Technological Development and Household Consumption on Ecological Footprint in Visegrad Countries
Orhan Cengiz, Fatma İdil Baktemur, Meltem Canoglu

143-158
Relationship Between Organic Farmland Expansion and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Ivan Zayukov, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, Oleksandr Tregubov, Sviatoslav Storchak, Viktor Mishchenko, Ruslan Lavrov

159-173
Spatiotemporal Distribution of the Impact of Climate Change and Human Activities on NDVI in China
Shuyi Dong, Wen Zhuang, Shuting Zhang, Shanshan Xie

174-189
How Economic and Monetary Policy Uncertainty Affect Climate Policy Uncertainty in the United States?
Ahmet Tayfur Akcan, Muhammad Shahbaz, Cuneyt Kılıç, Hasan Kazak

190-207
A Framework for Modeling the Decarbonization of the Economy Based on Energy Innovations in the Context of Industry 5.0 and Sustainable Development: International Perspective
Maryna Kravchenko, Kateryna Kopishynska, Olena Trofymenko, Ivan Pyshnograiev, Kateryna Boiarynova

207-220
Assessing the Level of Energy Security of China: Evidence from TOPSIS-entropy Weight Method
Li Pan

221-235
Sustainable Development through Geothermal Energy: Findings from Germany, Italy, Turkey, Iceland and France
Ignas Mikalauskas, Gabija Stanislovaitytė

236-244
Impact of Climate Change on Women’s Political Empowerment: The Sustainable Development Perspective
Chun-Ling Ding, Yan Ma, Guo-Hua Ni, Chun-Ping Chang

245-260
Women's Leadership in Accelerating Sustainable Development : Care Based Approach for Transformative Change
Purnima Lenka, Diptiranjan Khatua

261-270
Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in SAARC Countries
Jai Kumar, Chen Xi, Joti Kumari, Jinyan Huang

271-287
Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Asia: The Role of Political Institutions and Natural Resources
Li Guo, Romanus Osabohien, Armand Fréjuis Akpa Akpa, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan

288-309
Impact of Multidimensional Distance on Financial Cooperation: A Case Study of China and Neighboring Countries
Fuchang Li, Han Wang, Xiaohui Hu, Wenli Ding

310-328

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6615

Authors

Ignas Mikalauskas

ignas.mikalauskas@ku.lt

Klaipeda University, Lithuania

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-0900

Gabija Stanislovaitytė

gabija.stanislovaityte@knf.vu.lt

Vilnius University, Kaunas, Lithuania

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2379-3088

Abstract

Geothermal energy plays an important role in Europe’s transition towards sustainable energy systems, significantly contributing to environmental, economic and social sustainability. This paper conducts a comparative analysis of geothermal energy development in Germany, Italy, Turkey, Iceland and France. It highlights their unique approaches, policy frameworks and technological advancements. The study reveals that geothermal energy strengthens energy security, reduces greenhouse gas emissions and promotes economic growth. Despite different levels of development, each country shows progress in integrating geothermal energy into their renewable energy portfolios. The findings show the importance of strong governance, policy support and technological innovation in order to achieve sustainable development by developing and using geothermal energy.

Keywords:

geothermal energy, sustainable development, renewable energy policy, comparative analysis

References

1. AGBI, 2024, Investors warm to Turkey’s geothermal sector, https://www.agbi.com/renewable-energy/2024/04/investors-warm-to-turkeys-geothermal-sector/.

2. AL-QADAMI E. H. H., MUSTAFFA Z., AL-ATROUSH M. E., 2022, Evaluation of the pavement geothermal energy harvesting technologies towards sustainability and renewable energy, Energies 15(3): 1201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15031201

3. ALSALEH M., ABDUL-RAHIM A. S., 2023, Rethinking the governance of geothermal power industry: The roadmap for sustainable development, Energy Exploration & Exploitation 41(6): 1821-1849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987231185885

4. ALSALEH M., YANG Z., CHEN T., WANG X., ABDUL-RAHIM A. S., MAHMOOD H., 2023, Moving toward environmental sustainability: Assessing the influence of geothermal power on carbon dioxide emissions, Renewable Ener-gy 202: 880-893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.060

5. AVCI A. C., KAYGUSUZ O., AYGUSUZ, K., 2020, Geothermal energy for sustainable development, Journal of Engi-neering Research and Applied Science, 9(1): 1414-1426.

6. BASHIR M. A., DENGFENG Z., SHAHZADI I., BASHIR M. F., 2023, Does geothermal energy and natural resources affect environmental sustainability? Evidence in the lens of sustainable development, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(8): 21769-21780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23656-8

7. CMS, 2023, CMS expert guide to renewable energy: Italy, CMS Law, https://cms.law/en/int/expert-guides/cms-expert-guide-to-renewable-energy/italy.

8. DALLA LONGA F., NOGUEIRA L. P., LIMBERGER J., VAN WEES J. D., VAN DER ZWAAN B., 2020, Scenarios for geothermal energy deployment in Europe, Energy 206: 118060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118060

9. DOĞAN M., TEKBAŞ M., GURSOY S., 2022, The impact of wind and geothermal energy consumption on economic growth and financial development: evidence on selected countries, Geothermal Energy 10(1): 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-022-00230-6

10. DUMAS P., 2019, Policy and regulatory aspects of geothermal energy: A European perspective, Geothermal Energy and Society, eds Manzella A., Allansdottir A., Pellizzone P., Springer: 19-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78286-7_2

11. EUROPEAN GEOTHERMAL ENERGY COUNCIL, 2020, The geothermal energy market grows exponentially, but needs the right market conditions to thrive, https://www.egec.org/the-geothermal-energy-market-grows-exponentially-but-needs-the-right-market-conditions-to-thrive/.

12. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 2023, Geothermal energy in the EU, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/754566/EPRS_BRI(2023)754566_EN.pdf.

13. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 2024, European Parliament adopts own-initiative report on geothermal, https://eurogeologists.eu/european-parliament-adopts-own-initiative-report-on-geothermal/.

14. GEOENVI, 2024, GEOENVI project, https://www.geoenvi.eu/.

15. GIAMBASTIANI B. M. S., TINTIF., MENDRINOS D., MASTROCICCO M., 2014, Energy performance strategies for the large scale introduction of geothermal energy in residential and industrial buildings: The GEO. POWER project, Energy Policy 65: 315-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.008

16. HACKSTEIN F. V., MADLENER R., 2021, Sustainable operation of geothermal power plants: why economics matters, Geothermal Energy 9: 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-021-00183-2

17. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY, 2010, Renewable energy essentials: Geothermal, https://www.iea.org/reports/renewable-energy-essentials-geothermal.

18. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY, 2021, Germany’s Renewables Energy Act (EEG), https://www.iea.org/policies/12392-germanys-renewables-energy-act.

19. INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY AGENCY (IRENA), 2017, Geothermal power: Technology brief, https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2017/Aug/IRENA_Geothermal_Power_2017.pdf.

20. JÓNSSON, Ö. D., KARLSSON, B. F., & SAEMUNDSSON, R. J., 2019, Taming the elements – The use of geothermal energy in Iceland, Geothermal Energy and Society, eds Manzella A., Allansdottir A., Pellizzone P., Springer: 145-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78286-7_10

21. KARLSDOTTIR M. R., HEINONEN J., PALSSON H., PALSSON O. P., 2020, High-temperature geothermal utiliza-tion in the context of european energy policy – implications and limitations, Energies 13(12): 3187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123187

22. LIAO Z., 2023, Assessing Sustainable Impacts of Green Energy Projects for the Development of Renewable Energy Technologies: A Triple Bottom Line Approach, Processes, 11(8): 2228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11082228

23. LISE W., UYAR T. S., 2022, Towards more geothermal energy in Turkey, Renewable Energy Based Solutions, eds.Uyar T.S., Iawani N., Springer International Publishing, Cham: 363-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05125-8_15

24. MEIRBEKOVA R., BONCIANI D., OLAFSSON D. I., KORUCAN A., DERIN-GÜRE P., HARCOUËT-MENOU V., BERO W., 2024, Opportunities and Challenges of Geothermal Energy: A Comparative Analysis of Three European Cases – Belgium, Iceland, and Italy, Energies 17(16): 4134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164134

25. NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY (NREL), 2024, Geothermal electricity production basics, https://www.nrel.gov/research/re-geo-elec-production.html.

26. OZCELIK M., 2022, Environmental and social impacts of the increasing number of geothermal power plants (Büyük Menderes Graben – Turkey), Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29(11): 15526-15538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16941-5

27. OZER B., KIZILAY S., 2021, A research on sustainability of a geothermal energy resource in Kırklareli City, Internation-al Journal of Advanced Engineering and Pure Science 33(1): 11-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.671234

28. PROCESI M., CANTUCCI B., BUTTINELLI M., ARMEZZANI G., QUATTROCCHI F., BOSCHI E., 2013, Strategic use of the underground in an energy mix plan: Synergies among CO2, CH4 geological storage and geothermal energy. Lati-um Region case study (Central Italy), Applied Energy 110: 104-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.071

29. RENOTH R., BUCHNER E., SCHMIEDER M., KEIM M., PLECHATY M., DREWS M., 2023, Social acceptance of geothermal technology on a global view: a systematic review, Energy, Sustainability and Society 13(1): 49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00432-1

30. SCHÜTZ F., HUENGES E., SPALEK A., BRUHN D., PÉREZ P., DE GREGORIO M., 2013, Geothermal Electricity: Potential for CO2 Mitigation, GEOELEC Project D, http://www.geoelec.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/D4.6.pdf

31. SHORTALL R., DAVIDSDOTTIR B., AXELSSON G., 2015, Geothermal energy for sustainable development: A re-view of sustainability impacts and assessment frameworks, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 44: 391-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.020

32. SITZENFREI R., MÖDERL M., HELLBACH C., FLEISCHHACKER E., RAUCH W., 2011, Geothermal Energy in a Central European Perspective – Challenges and Opportunities, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011: Bearing Knowledge for Sustainability, eds Beighley E., Killgore M.W., American Society of Civil Engineers: 876-885, https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784411735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/41173(414)90

33. SOLTANI M., KASHKOOLI F. M., SOURI M., RAFIEI B., JABARIFAR M., GHARALI K., NATHWANI J. S., 2021, Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Re-views 140: 110750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110750

34. STEFANSSON V., 2002, Investment cost for geothermal power plants, Geothermics 31(2): 263-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6505(01)00018-9

35. THINK GEO ENERGY, 2021, Geothermal energy in France – What is needed for tapping its potential?, https://www.thinkgeoenergy.com/geothermal-energy-in-france-what-is-needed-for-tapping-its-potential/.

36. THINK GEO ENERGY, 2024, European Commission approves Italy aid scheme for geothermal, renewables, https://www.thinkgeoenergy.com/european-commission-approves-italy-aid-scheme-for-geothermal-renewables/.

37. TOMAROV G. V., SHIPKOV A. A., 2017, Modern geothermal power: Binary cycle geothermal power plants, Thermal Engineering 64(4): 243-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601517040097

38. TOTH A. N., FENERTY D. K., SZTERMEN O. L., 2024, Can Eastern Europe use new EU funding and legislation to help Europe achieve zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050?, https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/GeoConf/papers/SGW/2024/Toth.pdf.

39. WANG X., ALSALEH M., 2023, Determinants of geothermal power sustainability development: Do global competitive-ness markets matter?, Sustainability 15(4): 3747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043747

40. WORLD BANK., 2021, Geothermal energy in Turkey, World Bank Open Knowledge Repository, https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/22e105c7-550f-531d-8e2c-4011098ecf54/full.

41. WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, 2021, Earth’s energy will power Microsoft’s new sustainable campus, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/09/geothermal-energy-microsoft-sustainable-campus/.

42. YANG X., LIU Y., THRÄN D., BEZAMA A., WANG M., 2021, Effects of the German Renewable Energy Sources Act and environmental, social and economic factors on biogas plant adoption and agricultural land use change, Energy, Sus-tainability and Society 11: 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00282-9

Mikalauskas, I., & Stanislovaitytė, G. (2025). Sustainable Development through Geothermal Energy: Findings from Germany, Italy, Turkey, Iceland and France . Problemy Ekorozwoju, 20(1), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6615

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Sustainable Development through Geothermal Energy: Findings from Germany, Italy, Turkey, Iceland and France

Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)

Archives

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

License

Downloads

Article Sidebar

Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)

Archives

Main Article Content

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

Article Details

License

Downloads