Towards Co-existence. Responsibility in the Anthropocene Debate

Jeremiasz Szyndler


University of Silesia, Doctoral School, Wojewódzka 50/3A, 40-026 Katowice, Poland (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5342-4427

Abstract

P. Crutzen and E. Stoermer’s concept that humanity has entered a new geological epoch – the Anthropocene, in which the human species has become the leading geological force, is the subject of multidisciplinary scientific research. The debate on the Age of Man reconnects the sphere of facts and the normative sphere, while still continuing the eco-developmental concept oriented towards the search for new socio-economic solutions. One of the assumptions of the naturalistic narrative of the Anthropocene is the conviction that human action has the greatest impact on the environment and we are responsible for its condition. Often compared in literature to other great revolutions in science – Copernicus‘ and Darwin‘s theory – the paradigm shift in thinking in the Anthropocene  forces us to rethink the key concepts of classical philosophy: human, nature, responsibility. The article presents an outline of the ethical debate on responsibility in the Anthropocene, considering its collective and individual aspects, and introduces a new concept of co-existence, which integrates ecosystems with the technosphere.


Keywords:

Antrophocene, human, nature, responsibility, ethics, technosphere

BIŃCZYK E., 2018, Epoka człowieka, PWN, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

BIŃCZYK E., 2013, Ocalić Gaję i zbawić zbiorowość. Ekoteologiczne sugestie Brunona Latour, Stan rzeczy, 2(5): 137-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.5.10   Google Scholar


  Google Scholar

BIŃCZYK E., 2018 Troska o postprzyrodę w epoce antropocenu, Etyka 57: 137-155.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14394/42   Google Scholar

BONNEUIL C., FRESSOZ J.B., 2017, Shock of The Anthropocene, Verso Books Press, Londyn.
  Google Scholar

CIANCONI P., BETRO S., JANIIRI L., 2020, The Impact of Climate Change on Mental Health: A Systematic Descriptive Review, Frotniers in Psychiatry, 11(74): 1-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074   Google Scholar

CIĄŻELA H., 2006, Etyka odpowiedzialności H. Jonasa, a ‘trwały i zrównoważony rozwój’ (Imperatywy i dylematy), Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 1(2): 107-114.
  Google Scholar

GARDINER S., 2004, Ethics and Global Climate Change, Ethics 114(3): 555-600.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/382247   Google Scholar

HAMILTON C., 2017, Defiant Earth, Allen & Unwin Press, Crow’s Nest.
  Google Scholar

HAYES K., BLASHKI G., BURKE S., REIFELS L., 2018, Climate change and mental health: risks, impacts and priority actions, International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 12(28): 1-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0210-6   Google Scholar

HOŁY-ŁUCZAJ M., BLOK V., 2019, How to Deal with Hybrids in the Anthropocene? Towards a Philosophy of Technology and Environmental, Philosophy 2.0, Environmental Values, 28: 325–345.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327119X15519764179818   Google Scholar

HORNBORG A., 2015, The Political Ecology of Technocene: uncovering ecologically unequal exchange in the world
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743424-5   Google Scholar

system, The Anthropocene and Global Environmental Crisis, Routledge, New York Studies, 44(3): 594-630.
  Google Scholar

JAMIESON D., 1992, Ethics, Public Policy and Global Warming, Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(2): 139-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700201   Google Scholar


  Google Scholar

JONAS H., 1984, The Imperative of Responsibility, in Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  Google Scholar

IPPC, Special report: Climate Change and Land, https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/ (20.05.2021).
  Google Scholar

KIPEAS A., Człowiek wobec dylematów filozofii techniki, Wydawnictwo Gnome, Katowice.
  Google Scholar

KEMPF H., 2008, How the Rich are Destroying the Earth, Green Books, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

LATOUR B., 2017, Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climate Regime, John Wiley & Sons, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

MARZEC A, 2018, ‘Jesteśmy połączonym z sobą światem’ – Timothy Morton i widmo innej wspólnoty, Teksty drugie 2: 88-101.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18318/td.2018.2.6   Google Scholar

MARZEC A, 2019, Czy warzywa pamiętają o swoich korzeniach? O nostalgii w społeczeństwie roślin i projekcie ekologii bez ‘Natury’, Poetyki ekocydu. Historia, natura, konflikt, eds. Ubertowska A., Korczyńska-Partyka D., Kuliś E., IBL, Warsaw: 69-83.
  Google Scholar

MCKIBBEN B., 2006, The End of Nature, Random House inc.
  Google Scholar

MOORE J., 2017, The Capitalocene Part I: On the Nature & Origins of Our Ecological Crisis, Journal of Peasant: 1-39.
  Google Scholar

MORTON T., 2016 Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence, Columbia University.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/mort17752   Google Scholar

NORGARD K., 2012, Climate Change, Emotions and Everyday Life, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

ORESKES N., Conway E., 2011, Merchants of Doubt, Bloomsbury Publishing, Londyn.
  Google Scholar

RENN J., 2020, The Evolution of Knowledge: rethinking Science for the Anthropocene, Princeton University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691185675   Google Scholar

RIPPLE J & 15 364 scientists from 184 countries, 2017, World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notic, BioScience, 67(12): 1026-1028.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125   Google Scholar

ROCKSTROM J., STEFFEN W., 2009, Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity, Ecology and Society, 14(2): 32-66.
  Google Scholar

STIEGLER B., 2018, Neganthropocene, Open Humanities Press.
  Google Scholar

TYBURSKI W., 2006, Powstanie i rozwój filozofii ekologicznej, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 1(1): 7-15.
  Google Scholar

UNEP, Global Environmental Outlook 6, https://www.unep.org/resources/global-environment-outlook-6 (20.05.2021).
  Google Scholar

VOGEL S., 2015, Thinking Like a Mall Environmental Philosophy After the End of Nature, MIT Press, Cambridge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262029100.001.0001   Google Scholar

WILISTON B., 2015, The Anthropocene Project: Virtue in the Age of Climate Change, University of Oxford Press, Oxford.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746713.001.0001   Google Scholar


Published
2022-07-03

Cited by

Szyndler, J. (2022). Towards Co-existence. Responsibility in the Anthropocene Debate. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 17(2), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.03

Authors

Jeremiasz Szyndler 

University of Silesia, Doctoral School, Wojewódzka 50/3A, 40-026 Katowice, Poland Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5342-4427

Statistics

Abstract views: 35
PDF downloads: 22