Sustainable Development (1987-2005) – an Oxymoron Comes of Age
Michael R. Redclift
King’s College London, UK (United Kingdom)
Abstract
In the wake of the Brundtland report (1987) it was argued that ‘development’ ought to be able to accommodate ‘sustainability’. The discussion of ‘development’ needed to be enlarged and a ‘long view’ taken of society/nature relations. During the last two decades this formulation has increasingly been called into question: critics of ‘sustainable development’ have argued that it is an oxymoron, and that development cannot accommodate sustainability, and there has been criticism from the skeptical Right and the Deep Green Left. Others have argued that both the scientific evidence of global environmental change and increasing globalization (both economic and cultural) suggest that it is possible to “re-tune” development along lines that are less energy and material intensive. However, the political and social implications of employing the idea of ‘sustainability’ have rarely been thought through. There has little attention to the implications of re-thinking sustainability for governance, security or ideas of justice. During the 1970s and 1980s environmental policy and regulation identified external risks (wildlife, effluents etc) which could be contained and repaired. The risks were seen as controllable. There was strong modernist impulse at work in delineating human responsibilities for nature. Since 1992, however, this confident, regulatory modernist impulse has been undermined. Floods, storms, habitat loss and droughts can be seen as immanent to the system (especially the climate system). They are internal risks. These doubts about control extend to new areas, notably the new genetics.
This paper examines the direction of current thinking on sustainable development in the light of the intellectual inheritance prior to 1992, the date of the first Earth Summit, when ‘sustainability’ entered mainstream thinking about development.
Keywords:
sustainable development, modernity, global environmental changeReferences
BAUMANN Z., Globalisation, Polity Press, Cambridge 1988.
Google Scholar
BECKER E., JAHN T., Exploring Uncommon Ground: sustainability and the social sciences in: ed. Becker E., Jahn, T., Sustainability and
Google Scholar
the Social Sciences, Zed Press, London 1999.
Google Scholar
BROWDER J., 1995, Deforestation and the Environmental Crisis in Latin America, in: Latin American Research Review, 30 (3).
Google Scholar
BRUNDTLAND Commission, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987.
Google Scholar
CASTELLS M., 2000, Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society, in: British Journal of Sociology, 51 (1).
Google Scholar
DE ANGELIS, 2000, Globalisation, New Internationalism and the Zapatistas, in: Capital and Class, 70, Spring.
Google Scholar
DOBSON A., Justice and the Environment, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998.
Google Scholar
ESTEVA G., 1999, The Zapatista’s and People’s Power, in: Capital and Class, 68,.
Google Scholar
FINKLER K., Experiencing the New Genetics, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia 2000.
Google Scholar
HABERMAS J., Theory and Practice, New Left Books 1971.
Google Scholar
LEACH M., FAIRHEAD J., 2000, Forestry and discourse representation, in: Development and Change, 31 (1).
Google Scholar
LATOUR B., We Have Never Been Modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1993.
Google Scholar
LAW M. and BARNETT, C., 2000, After Globalisation, in: Environment and Planning D, 18 (1), February.
Google Scholar
LUKE T.W., Environmentality as Green Governmentality, in: ed. Darnier E., Habermas, J., What does socialism mean today? w: ed. R. Blackburn, After the Fall, Verso, London 1999.
Google Scholar
MEADOWS D.H., MEADOWS D.L., RANDERS J., BEHRENS W.W., The Limits to Growth, Pan Books, London 1972.
Google Scholar
McAFEE K., 1999, Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism, in: Environment and Planning, D. 17 (2).
Google Scholar
MILLER D., Social justice and environmental goods, in: ed. Dobson A., Fairness and Futurity, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998.
Google Scholar
PEARCE D., Blueprint 2: Greening the World Economy, Earthscan, London 1991.
Google Scholar
REDCLIFT M.R., Sustainable Development: exploring the contradictions, Routledge, London 1991.
Google Scholar
REDCLIFT M.R., Wasted: counting the costs of global consumption, Earthscan, London 1996.
Google Scholar
The Economist, June 10, 2000.
Google Scholar
VOGLER J., The Global Commons: environmental and technological governance, (second edition), John Wiley, Chichester 2000.
Google Scholar
WESTING A.H., 1999, Towards a universal recognition of environmental responsibilities, in: Environmental Conservation, 26 (3), September.
Google Scholar
Authors
Michael R. RedcliftKing’s College London, UK United Kingdom
Statistics
Abstract views: 6PDF downloads: 20
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
