A Process Model of Building Sustainable Competitive Advantage for Multinational Enterprises: An Empirical Case Study
Mengmeng Shan
School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444 (China)
Jianxin You
School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092 (China)
Yulu Wang
School of Business, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai 200433 (China)
Huchen Liu
huchenliu@foxmail.comSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092 (China)
Abstract
Multinational enterprises (MNEs) are the leading entities in the process of global economic integration, whose international expansion would be regulated and constrained by environmental issues. Drawing on theories of corporate social responsibility, corporate environmental behavior and legitimacy, this paper establishes a grounded process model that has both theoretical and practical significance. The model reveals that development of sustainable competitive advantage of MNEs is a gradual process that is dependent on the corporate environmental behavior and the legitimation of their behaviors. Via a real in-depth case study of Badische Anilin-Soda-Fabrik (BASF), one of the largest chemical companies in the world, the application and effectiveness of the proposed process model are demonstrated. Also, implications of this model and future directions for both research and practice are indicated.
Keywords:
multinational enterprises (MNEs), corporate social responsibility, corporate environmental behavior, corporate legitimacy, sustainable developmentReferences
ALDRICH H. E., FIOL C. M., 1994, Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 19, no 4, p. 645-670.
Google Scholar
ARAG N-CORREA J. A., 1998, Strategic Proactivity and Firm Approach to the Natural Environment, in: Academy of Management Journal, vol. 41, no 5, p. 556-567.
Google Scholar
ARAGON-CORREA J. A., SHARMA S., 2003, A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 28, no 1, p. 71-88.
Google Scholar
BANSAL P., 2005, Evolving Sustainably: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 26, no 3, p. 197-218.
Google Scholar
BANSAL P., CLELLAND I., 2004, Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment, in: Academy of Management Journal, vol. 47, no 1, p. 93-103.
Google Scholar
BANSAL P., HUNTER T., 2003, Strategic Explanations for the Early Adoption of ISO 14001, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 46, no 3, p. 289-299.
Google Scholar
BANSAL P., ROTH K., 2000, Why Companies Go Green, in: Academy of Management Journal, vol. 43, no 4, p. 717-747.
Google Scholar
BARNEY J., 1991, Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, in: Journal of Management, vol. 17, no 1, p. 99-120.
Google Scholar
BILKEY W. J., NES E., 1982, Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 13, no 1, p. 89-99.
Google Scholar
CANTWELL J., DUNNING J. H., LUNDAN S. M., 2010, An Evolutionary Approach to Understanding International Business Activity in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 41, no 4, p. 567-586.
Google Scholar
CHEN H.-C., CHUNG M.-F., 2014, How to Go Global with Differentiated Products, in: Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no 7, p. 3484-3490.
Google Scholar
CHRISTMANN P., 2004, Multinational Companies and the Natural Environment: Determinants of Global Environmental Policy, in: Academy of Management Journal, vol. 47, no 5, p. 747-760.
Google Scholar
CHRISTMANN P., TAYLOR G., 2001, Globalization and the Environment: Determinants of Firm Self-Regulation in China, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 32, no 3, p. 439-458.
Google Scholar
CLAVER E., L PEZ M. D., MOLINA J. F., TAR J. J., 2007, Environmental Management and Firm Performance, in: Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 84, no 4, p. 606-619.
Google Scholar
COSTA R., MENICHINI T., 2013, A Multidimensional Approach for CSR Assessment: The Importance of the Stakeholder Perception, in: Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no 1, p. 150-161.
Google Scholar
DELMAS M., 2001, Stakeholders and Competitive Advantage: The Case of ISO 14001, in: Production and Operations Management, vol. 10, no 3, p. 343-358.
Google Scholar
DELMAS M., RUSSO M. V., MONTES‐SANCHO M. J., 2007, Deregulation and Environmental Differentiation in the Electric Utility Industry, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, no 2, p. 189-209.
Google Scholar
DIMAGGIO P. J., POWELL W. W., 1983, The Iron Cage Revisited, in: American Sociological Review, vol. 48, no 2, p. 147-160.
Google Scholar
DOWLING J., PFEFFER J., 1975, Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior, in: Pacific Sociological Review, vol. 18, no 1, p. 122-136.
Google Scholar
DUNNING J. H., 1980, Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 11, no 1, p. 9-31.
Google Scholar
DUNNING J. H., 1988, The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 19, no 1, p. 1-31.
Google Scholar
DUNNING J. H., 2001, The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future, in: International Journal of the Economics of Business, vol. 8, no 2, p. 173-190.
Google Scholar
EISENHARDT K. M., MARTIN J. A., 2000, Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, no 10-11, p. 1105-1121.
Google Scholar
FAHY J., 2002, A Resource-Based Analysis of Sustainable Competitive Advantage in a Global Environment, in: International Business Review, vol. 11, no 1, p. 57-77.
Google Scholar
HAKSEVER C., CHAGANTI R., COOK R. G., 2004, A Model of Value Creation: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 49, no 3, p. 295-307.
Google Scholar
HUMPHREYS P., MCIVOR R., CHAN F., 2003, Using Case-Based Reasoning to Evaluate Supplier Environmental Management Performance, in: Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 25, no 2, p. 141-153.
Google Scholar
HUSTED B. W., ALLEN D. B., 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility in the Multinational Enterprise: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, no 6, p. 838-849.
Google Scholar
KAPLAN S. E., RULAND R. G., 1991, Positive Theory, Rationality and Accounting Regulation, in: Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 2, no 4, p. 361-374.
Google Scholar
KOLK A., PINKSE J., 2008, A Perspective on Multinational Enterprises and Climate Change: Learning from ‘An Inconvenient Truth’?, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 39, no 8, p. 1359-1378.
Google Scholar
KOLK A., VAN TULDER R., 2010, International Business, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustain. Develop., in: International Business Review, vol. 19, no 2, p. 119-125.
Google Scholar
LEE V.-H., OOI K.-B., CHONG A. Y.-L., SEOW C., 2014, Creating Technological Innovation Via Green Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Analysis, in: Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no 16, p. 6983-6994.
Google Scholar
LIU Y., 2009, Investigating External Environmental Pressure on Firms and Their Behavior in Yangtze River Delta of China, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 17, no 16, p. 1480-1486.
Google Scholar
LOGSDON J. M., WOOD D. J., 2005, Global Business Citizenship and Voluntary Codes of Ethical Conduct, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 59, no 1-2, p. 55-67.
Google Scholar
LOW P., YEATS A., 1992, Do ‘Dirty’ Industries Migrate? In: International Trade and the Environment, ed. Low P., WB, Washington.
Google Scholar
LUO Y., 2006, Political Behavior, Social Responsibility, and Perceived Corruption: A Structuration Perspective, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, no 6, p. 747-766.
Google Scholar
MEYER J. W., ROWAN B., 1977, Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony, in: American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83, no 2, p. 340-363.
Google Scholar
MONTEALEGRE R., 2002, A Process Model of Capability Development: Lessons from the Electronic Commerce Strategy at Bolsa De Valores De Guayaquil, in: Organization Science, vol. 13, no 5, p. 514-531.
Google Scholar
MOON S. g., 2008, Corporate Environmental Behaviors in Voluntary Programs: Does Timing Matter?, in: Social Science Quarterly, vol. 89, no 5, p. 1102-1120.
Google Scholar
OLIVER C., 1991, Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes, in: The Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no 1, p. 145-179.
Google Scholar
OLIVER C., 1997, Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Combining Institutional and Resource-Based Views, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no 9, p. 697-713.
Google Scholar
ORSATO R. J., 2006, Competitive Environmental Strategies: When Does It Pay to Be Green?, in: California Management Review, vol. 48, no 2, p. 127-143.
Google Scholar
PARSONS R., LACEY J., MOFFAT K., 2014, Maintaining Legitimacy of a Contested Practice: How the Minerals Industry Understands Its ‘Social Licence to Operate’, in: Resources Policy, vol. 41, p. 83-90.
Google Scholar
PENG G. Z., BEAMISH P. W., 2007, Evolving FDI Legitimacy and Strategic Choice of Japanese Subsidiaries in China, in: Management and Organization Review, vol. 3, no 3, p. 373-396.
Google Scholar
PENG M. W., WANG D. Y., JIANG Y., 2008, An Institution-Based View of International Business Strategy: A Focus on Emerging Economies, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 39, no 5, p. 920-936.
Google Scholar
PORTER M. E., VAN DER LINDE C., 1995, Green and Competitive, in: Harvard Business Review, vol. 73, no 5, p. 120-134.
Google Scholar
PRAHALAD C. K., HAMEL G., 1990, The Core Competence of the Corporation, in: Harvard Business Review, vol. 68, no 3, p. 79-91.
Google Scholar
RAMACHANDRAN J., PANT A., 2010, The Liabilities of Origin: An Emerging Economy Perspective on the Costs of Doing Business Abroad, in: Advances in International Management, vol. 23, no, p. 231-265.
Google Scholar
RUGMAN A. M., VERBEKE A., 1998a, Corporate Strategies and Environmental Regulations: An Organizing Framework, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19, no 4, p. 363-375.
Google Scholar
RUGMAN A. M., VERBEKE A., 1998b, Corporate Strategy and International Environmental Policy, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 29, no 4, p. 819-833.
Google Scholar
RYDZEWSKI P., 2013, The Implementation of Sustainable Development Vs. Environmental Attitudes in International Comparative Studies, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 8, no 1, p. 125-137.
Google Scholar
SARKAR R., 2008, Public Policy and Corporate Environmental Behaviour: A Broader View, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 15, no 5, p. 281-297.
Google Scholar
SHARFMAN M. P., SHAFT T. M., TIHANYI L., 2004, A Model of the Global and Institutional Antecedents of High-Level Corporate Environmental Performance, in: Business & Society, vol. 43, no 1, p. 6-36.
Google Scholar
SHARMA S., VREDENBURG H., 1998, Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19, no 8, p. 729-753.
Google Scholar
SHRIVASTAVA P., 1995a, Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 16, no, p. 183-200.
Google Scholar
SHRIVASTAVA P., 1995b, The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability, in: The Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no 4, p. 936-960.
Google Scholar
STEG L., VLEK C., 2009, Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 29, no 3, p. 309-317.
Google Scholar
STRIKE V. M., GAO J., BANSAL P., 2006, Being Good While Being Bad: Social Responsibility and the International Diversification of Us Firms, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, no 6, p. 850-862.
Google Scholar
SUCHMAN M. C., 1995, Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no 3, p. 571-610.
Google Scholar
TEECE D. J., 2007, Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, no 13, p. 1319-1350.
Google Scholar
TEECE D. J., PISANO G., SHUEN A., 1997, Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no 7, p. 509-533.
Google Scholar
TIAN X., 2007, Accounting for Sources of Fdi Technology Spillovers: Evidence from China, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 38, no 1, p. 147-159.
Google Scholar
WCED, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York.
Google Scholar
WEI Y., LIU X., 2006, Productivity Spillovers from R&D, Exports and Fdi in China's Manufacturing Sector, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, no 4, p. 544-557.
Google Scholar
WERNERFELT B., 1984, A Resource-Based View of the Firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no 2, p. 171-180.
Google Scholar
Authors
Mengmeng ShanSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444 China
Authors
Jianxin YouSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092 China
Authors
Yulu WangSchool of Business, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai 200433 China
Authors
Huchen Liuhuchenliu@foxmail.com
School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092 China
Statistics
Abstract views: 33PDF downloads: 6
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.