Model procesu budowania zrównoważonej przewagi konkurencyjnej dla przedsiębiorstw międzynarodowych: studium przypadku
Mengmeng Shan
School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444 (Chiny)
Jianxin You
School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092 (Chiny)
Yulu Wang
School of Business, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai 200433 (Chiny)
Huchen Liu
huchenliu@foxmail.comSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092 (Chiny)
Abstrakt
Przedsiębiorstwa międzynarodowe stanowią wiodące podmioty w procesie globalnej integracji gospodarczej, których ekspansja międzynarodowa powinna uwzględniać regulacje i ograniczenia związane z ochrona środowiska.
Niniejszy artykuł, opierając się na teorii społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu, jego wpływowi na środowisko i legalności działania, przedstawia model istotny zarówno z poziomu teorii, jak i praktyki. Model ten pokazuje, że budowanie zrównoważonej przewagi konkurencyjnej przedsiębiorstw międzynarodowych jest procesem stopniowym, zależnym od podejścia do środowiska. Zastosowanie i skuteczność proponowanego modelu wykazano na przykładzie jednego z największych zakładów chemicznych na świecie, którym jest Badische Anilin-Soda-Fabrik (BASF). Zaproponowano także przyszłe kierunki badań, tak w kontekście naukowym, jak i praktycznym.
Słowa kluczowe:
przedsiębiorstwa międzynarodowe, społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu, wpływ biznesu na środowisko, legalność biznesu, rozwój zrównoważonyBibliografia
ALDRICH H. E., FIOL C. M., 1994, Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 19, no 4, p. 645-670.
Google Scholar
ARAG N-CORREA J. A., 1998, Strategic Proactivity and Firm Approach to the Natural Environment, in: Academy of Management Journal, vol. 41, no 5, p. 556-567.
Google Scholar
ARAGON-CORREA J. A., SHARMA S., 2003, A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 28, no 1, p. 71-88.
Google Scholar
BANSAL P., 2005, Evolving Sustainably: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 26, no 3, p. 197-218.
Google Scholar
BANSAL P., CLELLAND I., 2004, Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment, in: Academy of Management Journal, vol. 47, no 1, p. 93-103.
Google Scholar
BANSAL P., HUNTER T., 2003, Strategic Explanations for the Early Adoption of ISO 14001, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 46, no 3, p. 289-299.
Google Scholar
BANSAL P., ROTH K., 2000, Why Companies Go Green, in: Academy of Management Journal, vol. 43, no 4, p. 717-747.
Google Scholar
BARNEY J., 1991, Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, in: Journal of Management, vol. 17, no 1, p. 99-120.
Google Scholar
BILKEY W. J., NES E., 1982, Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 13, no 1, p. 89-99.
Google Scholar
CANTWELL J., DUNNING J. H., LUNDAN S. M., 2010, An Evolutionary Approach to Understanding International Business Activity in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 41, no 4, p. 567-586.
Google Scholar
CHEN H.-C., CHUNG M.-F., 2014, How to Go Global with Differentiated Products, in: Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no 7, p. 3484-3490.
Google Scholar
CHRISTMANN P., 2004, Multinational Companies and the Natural Environment: Determinants of Global Environmental Policy, in: Academy of Management Journal, vol. 47, no 5, p. 747-760.
Google Scholar
CHRISTMANN P., TAYLOR G., 2001, Globalization and the Environment: Determinants of Firm Self-Regulation in China, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 32, no 3, p. 439-458.
Google Scholar
CLAVER E., L PEZ M. D., MOLINA J. F., TAR J. J., 2007, Environmental Management and Firm Performance, in: Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 84, no 4, p. 606-619.
Google Scholar
COSTA R., MENICHINI T., 2013, A Multidimensional Approach for CSR Assessment: The Importance of the Stakeholder Perception, in: Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no 1, p. 150-161.
Google Scholar
DELMAS M., 2001, Stakeholders and Competitive Advantage: The Case of ISO 14001, in: Production and Operations Management, vol. 10, no 3, p. 343-358.
Google Scholar
DELMAS M., RUSSO M. V., MONTES‐SANCHO M. J., 2007, Deregulation and Environmental Differentiation in the Electric Utility Industry, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, no 2, p. 189-209.
Google Scholar
DIMAGGIO P. J., POWELL W. W., 1983, The Iron Cage Revisited, in: American Sociological Review, vol. 48, no 2, p. 147-160.
Google Scholar
DOWLING J., PFEFFER J., 1975, Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior, in: Pacific Sociological Review, vol. 18, no 1, p. 122-136.
Google Scholar
DUNNING J. H., 1980, Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 11, no 1, p. 9-31.
Google Scholar
DUNNING J. H., 1988, The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 19, no 1, p. 1-31.
Google Scholar
DUNNING J. H., 2001, The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future, in: International Journal of the Economics of Business, vol. 8, no 2, p. 173-190.
Google Scholar
EISENHARDT K. M., MARTIN J. A., 2000, Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, no 10-11, p. 1105-1121.
Google Scholar
FAHY J., 2002, A Resource-Based Analysis of Sustainable Competitive Advantage in a Global Environment, in: International Business Review, vol. 11, no 1, p. 57-77.
Google Scholar
HAKSEVER C., CHAGANTI R., COOK R. G., 2004, A Model of Value Creation: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 49, no 3, p. 295-307.
Google Scholar
HUMPHREYS P., MCIVOR R., CHAN F., 2003, Using Case-Based Reasoning to Evaluate Supplier Environmental Management Performance, in: Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 25, no 2, p. 141-153.
Google Scholar
HUSTED B. W., ALLEN D. B., 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility in the Multinational Enterprise: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, no 6, p. 838-849.
Google Scholar
KAPLAN S. E., RULAND R. G., 1991, Positive Theory, Rationality and Accounting Regulation, in: Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 2, no 4, p. 361-374.
Google Scholar
KOLK A., PINKSE J., 2008, A Perspective on Multinational Enterprises and Climate Change: Learning from ‘An Inconvenient Truth’?, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 39, no 8, p. 1359-1378.
Google Scholar
KOLK A., VAN TULDER R., 2010, International Business, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustain. Develop., in: International Business Review, vol. 19, no 2, p. 119-125.
Google Scholar
LEE V.-H., OOI K.-B., CHONG A. Y.-L., SEOW C., 2014, Creating Technological Innovation Via Green Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Analysis, in: Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no 16, p. 6983-6994.
Google Scholar
LIU Y., 2009, Investigating External Environmental Pressure on Firms and Their Behavior in Yangtze River Delta of China, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 17, no 16, p. 1480-1486.
Google Scholar
LOGSDON J. M., WOOD D. J., 2005, Global Business Citizenship and Voluntary Codes of Ethical Conduct, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 59, no 1-2, p. 55-67.
Google Scholar
LOW P., YEATS A., 1992, Do ‘Dirty’ Industries Migrate? In: International Trade and the Environment, ed. Low P., WB, Washington.
Google Scholar
LUO Y., 2006, Political Behavior, Social Responsibility, and Perceived Corruption: A Structuration Perspective, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, no 6, p. 747-766.
Google Scholar
MEYER J. W., ROWAN B., 1977, Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony, in: American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83, no 2, p. 340-363.
Google Scholar
MONTEALEGRE R., 2002, A Process Model of Capability Development: Lessons from the Electronic Commerce Strategy at Bolsa De Valores De Guayaquil, in: Organization Science, vol. 13, no 5, p. 514-531.
Google Scholar
MOON S. g., 2008, Corporate Environmental Behaviors in Voluntary Programs: Does Timing Matter?, in: Social Science Quarterly, vol. 89, no 5, p. 1102-1120.
Google Scholar
OLIVER C., 1991, Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes, in: The Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no 1, p. 145-179.
Google Scholar
OLIVER C., 1997, Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Combining Institutional and Resource-Based Views, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no 9, p. 697-713.
Google Scholar
ORSATO R. J., 2006, Competitive Environmental Strategies: When Does It Pay to Be Green?, in: California Management Review, vol. 48, no 2, p. 127-143.
Google Scholar
PARSONS R., LACEY J., MOFFAT K., 2014, Maintaining Legitimacy of a Contested Practice: How the Minerals Industry Understands Its ‘Social Licence to Operate’, in: Resources Policy, vol. 41, p. 83-90.
Google Scholar
PENG G. Z., BEAMISH P. W., 2007, Evolving FDI Legitimacy and Strategic Choice of Japanese Subsidiaries in China, in: Management and Organization Review, vol. 3, no 3, p. 373-396.
Google Scholar
PENG M. W., WANG D. Y., JIANG Y., 2008, An Institution-Based View of International Business Strategy: A Focus on Emerging Economies, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 39, no 5, p. 920-936.
Google Scholar
PORTER M. E., VAN DER LINDE C., 1995, Green and Competitive, in: Harvard Business Review, vol. 73, no 5, p. 120-134.
Google Scholar
PRAHALAD C. K., HAMEL G., 1990, The Core Competence of the Corporation, in: Harvard Business Review, vol. 68, no 3, p. 79-91.
Google Scholar
RAMACHANDRAN J., PANT A., 2010, The Liabilities of Origin: An Emerging Economy Perspective on the Costs of Doing Business Abroad, in: Advances in International Management, vol. 23, no, p. 231-265.
Google Scholar
RUGMAN A. M., VERBEKE A., 1998a, Corporate Strategies and Environmental Regulations: An Organizing Framework, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19, no 4, p. 363-375.
Google Scholar
RUGMAN A. M., VERBEKE A., 1998b, Corporate Strategy and International Environmental Policy, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 29, no 4, p. 819-833.
Google Scholar
RYDZEWSKI P., 2013, The Implementation of Sustainable Development Vs. Environmental Attitudes in International Comparative Studies, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 8, no 1, p. 125-137.
Google Scholar
SARKAR R., 2008, Public Policy and Corporate Environmental Behaviour: A Broader View, in: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 15, no 5, p. 281-297.
Google Scholar
SHARFMAN M. P., SHAFT T. M., TIHANYI L., 2004, A Model of the Global and Institutional Antecedents of High-Level Corporate Environmental Performance, in: Business & Society, vol. 43, no 1, p. 6-36.
Google Scholar
SHARMA S., VREDENBURG H., 1998, Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19, no 8, p. 729-753.
Google Scholar
SHRIVASTAVA P., 1995a, Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 16, no, p. 183-200.
Google Scholar
SHRIVASTAVA P., 1995b, The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability, in: The Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no 4, p. 936-960.
Google Scholar
STEG L., VLEK C., 2009, Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 29, no 3, p. 309-317.
Google Scholar
STRIKE V. M., GAO J., BANSAL P., 2006, Being Good While Being Bad: Social Responsibility and the International Diversification of Us Firms, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, no 6, p. 850-862.
Google Scholar
SUCHMAN M. C., 1995, Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no 3, p. 571-610.
Google Scholar
TEECE D. J., 2007, Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, no 13, p. 1319-1350.
Google Scholar
TEECE D. J., PISANO G., SHUEN A., 1997, Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no 7, p. 509-533.
Google Scholar
TIAN X., 2007, Accounting for Sources of Fdi Technology Spillovers: Evidence from China, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 38, no 1, p. 147-159.
Google Scholar
WCED, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York.
Google Scholar
WEI Y., LIU X., 2006, Productivity Spillovers from R&D, Exports and Fdi in China's Manufacturing Sector, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 37, no 4, p. 544-557.
Google Scholar
WERNERFELT B., 1984, A Resource-Based View of the Firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no 2, p. 171-180.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Mengmeng ShanSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444 Chiny
Autorzy
Jianxin YouSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092 Chiny
Autorzy
Yulu WangSchool of Business, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai 200433 Chiny
Autorzy
Huchen Liuhuchenliu@foxmail.com
School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092 Chiny
Statystyki
Abstract views: 33PDF downloads: 6
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.