Multi-criteria Evaluation of the Eco-innovation Level in the European Union Countries

Andrzej Kobryń

a.kobryn@pb.edu.pl
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology,ul. Wiejska 45E, 15-351 Bialystok (Poland)

Joanna Prystrom


Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Bialystok, ul. Warszawska 63, 15-062 Bialystok (Poland)


Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze and evaluate the level of eco-innovations in the European Union countries. For this purpose, a new method of multi-criteria analysis were used, i.e. PROTERRA method, which was developed by the authors of this article. Analysis concerns a data from the year 2015. There have been determined aggregate ratings, which characterized the eco-innovation level of particular European Union countries. Four classes of innovation level were defined: eco-innovation leaders, good eco-innovators, week eco-innovators and eco-innovation outsiders. Then, based on the calculated global ratings, European Union countries were assigned to the appropriate classes.


Keywords:

eco-innovation level, evaluation, multi-criteria analysis

ARUNDEL A., KEMP R., PARTO S., 2006, Indicators for environmental innovation: What and how to measure, in: The international handbook on environmental technology management, ed. Marinova D., Annandale D. and Phillimore J., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  Google Scholar

ASHFORD N.A., AYERS C., STONE, R.F., 1985, Using regulation to change the market for innovation, in: Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 9, p. 419-466.
  Google Scholar

BEHZADIAN M., KAZEMZADEH R.B., ALBADVI A., AGHDASI, M., 2010, PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, in: European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 200, p. 198-215.
  Google Scholar

BOSSINK B., 2013, Eco-Innovation and Sustainability Management. Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
  Google Scholar

BRANS J.P., MARESCHAL B., VINCKE PH., 1984, PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis, in: Operational Research’84, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  Google Scholar

BRANS J.P., MARESCHAL B., 2005, PROMETHEE methods, in: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, ed. Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M., Springer, New York.
  Google Scholar

DÍAZ-GARCÍA C., GONZÁLEZ-MORENO Á., SÁEZ-MARTÍNEZ F.J., 2015, Eco-innovation: insights from a literature review, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, vol.17, p. 6-23.
  Google Scholar

DIME.EU, http://www.dime-eu.org/files/active/0/Foxon_Speirs_Pearson_final.pdf, (09.12.2016).
  Google Scholar

DOUMPOS M., GRIGOROUDIS E. (eds.), 2013, Multicriteria decision aid and artificial intelligence. Links, theory and applications,. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester.
  Google Scholar

FIGUEIRA J., SALVATORE G., EHRGOTT M. (eds.), 2005, Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
  Google Scholar

FUKASAKU Y., 2005, The need for environmental innovation indicators and data from a policy perspective, in: Towards environmental innovation systems, ed. Weber M. and Hemmelskamp J., Springer, Berlin.
  Google Scholar

FUSSLER C., JAMES P., 1996, Driving eco-innovation: A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability. Pitman Publishing, London.
  Google Scholar

JAFFE A.B., NEWELL R.G., STAVINS R.N., 2002, Environmental policy and technological change, in: Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 22, p. 41-69.
  Google Scholar

JANASZ W., KOZIOŁ K., 2007, Determinanty działalności innowacyjnej przedsiębiorstw. PWE, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

KANERVA M., ARUNDEL A., KEMP R., 2009, Environmental innovation: Using qualitative models to identify indicators for policy. United Nations University – MERIT, Maastricht.
  Google Scholar

KEMP R., PEARSON P., 2008, Measuring eco-innovation (Final Report MEI project), UNU-MERIT, Maastricht.
  Google Scholar

KEMP R., PONTOGLIO S., 2008, The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments – A typical case of the blind men and the elephant. Paper for DIME WP 2.5 Workshop on Empirical Analyses of Environmental Innovations, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), 17-18 January, Karlsruhe.
  Google Scholar

KEMP R., 2011, Ten themes for eco-innovation policies in Europe. S.A.P.I.E.N.S., vol. 4, p. 1-20.
  Google Scholar

LEGLER H., SCHMOCH U., GEHRKE B., KRAWCZYK O., 2003, Innovationsindikatoren zur Umweltwirtschaft, Studien zum deutschen Innovationssytem, Nr. 2., NIW and Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institut, Hannover.
  Google Scholar

LEITNER A., WEHRMEYER W., FRANCE CH., 2010, The impact of regulation and policy on radical eco-innovation: The need for a new understanding, in: Management Research Review, vol. 33, p. 1022-1041.
  Google Scholar

MATEO J.R., 2012, Multi-criteria analysis in the renewable energy industry. Springer-Verlag, London.
  Google Scholar

OLTRA V., KEMP R., DE VRIES F., 2007, Patents as a measure for eco-innovation. Report for the MEI project. University of Bordeaux, UNU-MERIT and University of Stirling, Bordeaux.
  Google Scholar

RENNINGS K., 2000, Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 32, p. 319-332.
  Google Scholar

SARKAR A.N., 2013, Promoting eco-innovations to leverage sustainable development of eco-industry and green growth, in: European Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 2, p. 171-224.
  Google Scholar

SPEIRS J., PEARSON P., FOXON T., 2008, Adapting Innovation Systems Indicators to assess Eco-Innovation, in: DIME working paper, Brussels.
  Google Scholar

TZENG G.H., HUANG J.J., 2011, Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. CRC Press, Taylor&Francis Group, Boca Raton.
  Google Scholar

VAN DER VOET E., VAN OERS L., MOLL S., SCHUTZ H., BRINGEZU S., DE BRUYN S., SEVENSTER M., WARRINGA G., 2005, Policy review on decoupling: Development of indicators to assess decoupling of economic development and environmental pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 countries. Report commissioned by the European Commission, Leiden.
  Google Scholar

WIJEN F., ZOETEMAN K., PIETERS J., VAN SETERS P. (eds.), 2012, A Handbook of globalisation and environmental policy, Second edition. National government interventions in a global arena. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton.
  Google Scholar

ZOPOUNIDIS C., PARDALOS P.M. (eds.), 2010, Handbook of multicriteria analysis. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2017-07-03

Cited by

Kobryń, A., & Prystrom, J. (2017). Multi-criteria Evaluation of the Eco-innovation Level in the European Union Countries. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 12(2), 15–26. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/4975

Authors

Andrzej Kobryń 
a.kobryn@pb.edu.pl
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology,ul. Wiejska 45E, 15-351 Bialystok Poland

Authors

Joanna Prystrom 

Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Bialystok, ul. Warszawska 63, 15-062 Bialystok Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 14
PDF downloads: 9