Wielokryterialna ocena poziomu ekoinnowacji w krajach Unii Europejskiej
Andrzej Kobryń
a.kobryn@pb.edu.plFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology,ul. Wiejska 45E, 15-351 Bialystok (Polska)
Joanna Prystrom
Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Bialystok, ul. Warszawska 63, 15-062 Bialystok (Polska)
Abstrakt
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza i ocena poziomu ekoinnowacji w krajach Unii Europejskiej. W tym celu została użyta nowa metoda analizy wielokryterialnej, tzn. metoda PROTERRA, która została opracowana przez autorów tego artykułu. Analiza obejmuje dane z roku 2015. Zostały wyznaczone oceny zagregowane, które charakteryzują poziom ekoinnowacji w poszczególnych krajach Unii Europejskiej. Zostały zdefiniowane cztery klasy ekoinnowacji: liderzy ekoinnowacji, dobrzy ekoinnowatorzy, słabi ekoinnowatorzy oraz outsiderzy ekoinnowacji. W rezultacie, na podstawie obliczonych ocen globalnych, kraje Unii Europejskiej zostały przyporządkowane do odpowiednich klas.
Słowa kluczowe:
poziom ekoinnowacji, ocena, analiza wielokryterialnaBibliografia
ARUNDEL A., KEMP R., PARTO S., 2006, Indicators for environmental innovation: What and how to measure, in: The international handbook on environmental technology management, ed. Marinova D., Annandale D. and Phillimore J., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Google Scholar
ASHFORD N.A., AYERS C., STONE, R.F., 1985, Using regulation to change the market for innovation, in: Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 9, p. 419-466.
Google Scholar
BEHZADIAN M., KAZEMZADEH R.B., ALBADVI A., AGHDASI, M., 2010, PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, in: European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 200, p. 198-215.
Google Scholar
BOSSINK B., 2013, Eco-Innovation and Sustainability Management. Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
Google Scholar
BRANS J.P., MARESCHAL B., VINCKE PH., 1984, PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis, in: Operational Research’84, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Google Scholar
BRANS J.P., MARESCHAL B., 2005, PROMETHEE methods, in: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, ed. Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M., Springer, New York.
Google Scholar
DÍAZ-GARCÍA C., GONZÁLEZ-MORENO Á., SÁEZ-MARTÍNEZ F.J., 2015, Eco-innovation: insights from a literature review, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, vol.17, p. 6-23.
Google Scholar
DIME.EU, http://www.dime-eu.org/files/active/0/Foxon_Speirs_Pearson_final.pdf, (09.12.2016).
Google Scholar
DOUMPOS M., GRIGOROUDIS E. (eds.), 2013, Multicriteria decision aid and artificial intelligence. Links, theory and applications,. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester.
Google Scholar
FIGUEIRA J., SALVATORE G., EHRGOTT M. (eds.), 2005, Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
Google Scholar
FUKASAKU Y., 2005, The need for environmental innovation indicators and data from a policy perspective, in: Towards environmental innovation systems, ed. Weber M. and Hemmelskamp J., Springer, Berlin.
Google Scholar
FUSSLER C., JAMES P., 1996, Driving eco-innovation: A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability. Pitman Publishing, London.
Google Scholar
JAFFE A.B., NEWELL R.G., STAVINS R.N., 2002, Environmental policy and technological change, in: Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 22, p. 41-69.
Google Scholar
JANASZ W., KOZIOŁ K., 2007, Determinanty działalności innowacyjnej przedsiębiorstw. PWE, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
KANERVA M., ARUNDEL A., KEMP R., 2009, Environmental innovation: Using qualitative models to identify indicators for policy. United Nations University – MERIT, Maastricht.
Google Scholar
KEMP R., PEARSON P., 2008, Measuring eco-innovation (Final Report MEI project), UNU-MERIT, Maastricht.
Google Scholar
KEMP R., PONTOGLIO S., 2008, The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments – A typical case of the blind men and the elephant. Paper for DIME WP 2.5 Workshop on Empirical Analyses of Environmental Innovations, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), 17-18 January, Karlsruhe.
Google Scholar
KEMP R., 2011, Ten themes for eco-innovation policies in Europe. S.A.P.I.E.N.S., vol. 4, p. 1-20.
Google Scholar
LEGLER H., SCHMOCH U., GEHRKE B., KRAWCZYK O., 2003, Innovationsindikatoren zur Umweltwirtschaft, Studien zum deutschen Innovationssytem, Nr. 2., NIW and Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institut, Hannover.
Google Scholar
LEITNER A., WEHRMEYER W., FRANCE CH., 2010, The impact of regulation and policy on radical eco-innovation: The need for a new understanding, in: Management Research Review, vol. 33, p. 1022-1041.
Google Scholar
MATEO J.R., 2012, Multi-criteria analysis in the renewable energy industry. Springer-Verlag, London.
Google Scholar
OLTRA V., KEMP R., DE VRIES F., 2007, Patents as a measure for eco-innovation. Report for the MEI project. University of Bordeaux, UNU-MERIT and University of Stirling, Bordeaux.
Google Scholar
RENNINGS K., 2000, Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 32, p. 319-332.
Google Scholar
SARKAR A.N., 2013, Promoting eco-innovations to leverage sustainable development of eco-industry and green growth, in: European Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 2, p. 171-224.
Google Scholar
SPEIRS J., PEARSON P., FOXON T., 2008, Adapting Innovation Systems Indicators to assess Eco-Innovation, in: DIME working paper, Brussels.
Google Scholar
TZENG G.H., HUANG J.J., 2011, Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. CRC Press, Taylor&Francis Group, Boca Raton.
Google Scholar
VAN DER VOET E., VAN OERS L., MOLL S., SCHUTZ H., BRINGEZU S., DE BRUYN S., SEVENSTER M., WARRINGA G., 2005, Policy review on decoupling: Development of indicators to assess decoupling of economic development and environmental pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 countries. Report commissioned by the European Commission, Leiden.
Google Scholar
WIJEN F., ZOETEMAN K., PIETERS J., VAN SETERS P. (eds.), 2012, A Handbook of globalisation and environmental policy, Second edition. National government interventions in a global arena. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton.
Google Scholar
ZOPOUNIDIS C., PARDALOS P.M. (eds.), 2010, Handbook of multicriteria analysis. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Andrzej Kobryńa.kobryn@pb.edu.pl
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology,ul. Wiejska 45E, 15-351 Bialystok Polska
Autorzy
Joanna PrystromFaculty of Economics and Management, University of Bialystok, ul. Warszawska 63, 15-062 Bialystok Polska
Statystyki
Abstract views: 14PDF downloads: 9
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.