A Three-dimensional Aproach in Education for Sustainable Future

Živilė Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė


Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio 11, Vilnius, 10223, Lithuania (Lithuania)

Viktorija Žilinskaitė-Vytienė


Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio 11, Vilnius, 10223, Lithuania (Lithuania)

Ilona Valantinaitė


Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio 11, Vilnius, 10223, Lithuania (Lithuania)


Abstract

The concept of sustainable development is used in a growing number of new contexts (ever-modernising technologies, developing science, environmental protection, politics) and levels (global, regional, national, institutional, personal). The concept differs depending on an area in which it is used. Business,  technologies and politics use typical, already existing approaches to sustainable development. The projection/transposition of sustainable development paradigm into the sphere of education, science, technologies, economy, environmental protection and politics acquire the specifics of a sphere, namely structure and terminology, and has different elements. A wide field of human activity and different levels of the implementation of the concept of sustainable development make the analysis of this development and its implementation in the education sector more difficult. Both scientific and practical educational discourse need common parameters, common dimensions which unify the different areas of  sustainable development and allow educators to accurately convey a full picture of this development. In this article, we will highlight educational approach towards a sustainability paradigm by analysing the common dimensions of sustainable development. We will talk about the levels of the implementation of sustainable development by concentrating on education at a personal level. Having applied the triangle of the dimensions of sustainable development (Place, Permanence, Persons), created by L. Seghezzo, to explain and analyse the concept of quality of life, in the article, we will present a three dimensional model of education for sustainable development.


Keywords:

sustainability, sustainable development, quality of life, education

ADKINS B., FOTH M., SUMMERVILLE J., HIGGS P., 2007, Ecologies of innovation – Symbolic aspects of cross-organizational linkages in the design sector in an Australian inner-city area, in: American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 50, no 7, p. 922-934.
  Google Scholar

COHEN-ROSENTHAL E., 2004, Making sense out of industrial ecology: a framework for analysis and action, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 12, no 8-10, p. 1111-1123.
  Google Scholar

COTTLE S., 2004, Producing nature(s): on the changing production ecology of natural history TV, in: Media Culture & Society, vol. 26, no 1, p. 81-101.
  Google Scholar

Darnaus vystymosi darbotvarkė iki 2030 metų, 2015, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (22.06.2016).
  Google Scholar

DIENER E., SUH E., 1997, Measuring quality of life: economic, social and subjective indicators, in: Social Indicators Research, vol. 40, p. 189-216.
  Google Scholar

FLORIDA R., 2002, The Rise of Creative Class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure, communitiy and everyday life, Basic, New York.
  Google Scholar

FROMM E., 1976, To Have or to Be? The nature of the psyche, Harper & Row, New York.
  Google Scholar

HUCLE J., 2012, Towards a greater realism in learning for sustainability, in: Learning for Sustainability, p. 35-48, http://john.huckle.org.uk/download/2958/LfSChapterOne2012.pdf (10.07.2016).
  Google Scholar

HUGHES M., 2006, Affect, Meaning and Quality of Life, in: Social Forces, vol. 85, no. 2, p. 611-629.
  Google Scholar

KAČERAUSKAS T., 2016, Discourses of Ecology and the Sketches of Creative Ecology in the Context of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol.11, no.1, p. 31-39.
  Google Scholar

KOHLBERG L., 1984, The Psychology of Moral Development. Nature and Validity of Moral Stages, Harper and Row, San Francisco.
  Google Scholar

MASLAW A.H., 1954. Motivation and personality, Harper & Bros., New York, in: Seghezzo, 2009.
  Google Scholar

O‘CONNOR J., 1998, Natural Causes. Essays in Ecological Marxism, Guilford, New York.
  Google Scholar

PACE P., 2010, Education for sustainable development: current fad or renewed commitment to action? In: Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 315-323.
  Google Scholar

PAWŁOWSKI A., 2009, How many dimensions does sustainable development have?, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 16 no 2, p. 81-90.
  Google Scholar

PAWŁOWSKI A., 2011, Sustainable Development as a Civilizational Revolution. Multidimensional Approach to the Challenges of the 21st century, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, A Balkema Book, Boca Raton, Londyn, Nowy Jork, Leiden.
  Google Scholar

SEGHEZZO L., 2009, The five dimensions of sustainability, in: Enironmental Politics, vol.18, no. 4, p. 539-556.
  Google Scholar

SPRINGETT D., 2016, Education and the Problems of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 11, no 1, p. 7-14.
  Google Scholar

Study Protocol for the World Health Organization Project to Develop a Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL) (1993). Quality of Life Research, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 153-159, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4034396 (21.08.2016).
  Google Scholar

The World Summit on Sustainable Development. People, planet, prosperity, 2002, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/wssd/documents/wssd_brochure.pdf (21.08.2016).
  Google Scholar

WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987, Our Common Future (Brundtland Report), Oxford University Press, New York.
  Google Scholar

ZOLLER U., 2015, Research-Based Transformative Science/ STEM/ STES/ STESEP Education for Sustainability Thinking. From: Teaching to ‘Know‘ to Learning to ‘Think‘, in: Sustainability, vol 7, no. 4, p. 4474-4491.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2017-01-02

Cited by

Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Živilė, Žilinskaitė-Vytienė, V., & Valantinaitė, I. (2017). A Three-dimensional Aproach in Education for Sustainable Future. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 12(1), 63–69. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/4998

Authors

Živilė Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė 

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio 11, Vilnius, 10223, Lithuania Lithuania

Authors

Viktorija Žilinskaitė-Vytienė 

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio 11, Vilnius, 10223, Lithuania Lithuania

Authors

Ilona Valantinaitė 

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio 11, Vilnius, 10223, Lithuania Lithuania

Statistics

Abstract views: 9
PDF downloads: 5