Re-evaluating the Alignment of Omnivorous Choice and Animal Farming with Sustainable Development: Insights from Care Ethics

Upamita Mukherjee

upamita.mukherjee@iitg.ac.in
Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guwahati (India)
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4571-7608

Prabhu Venkataraman


Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guwahati (India)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-0792

Abstract

C

Care ethics plays a significant role in the philosophical investigation of sustainable development. This paper is an attempt to comprehend the intricate relationship between care ethics and omnivorism, particularly in the context of economic sustainability, animal farming, and holistic well-being. Care ethics emphasizes empathy, relationships, and responsibility, basically applied to human interactions with other humans, animals, and the environment. Omnivorism denotes the consumption of both animal-based foods and plants. Inspecting all these concepts through the lens of economic sustainability involves considering the impact of consumption choices on agriculture, resources, and environmental costs. Self-care sustainability involves assessing personal choices regarding health, well-being, and the broader ecological system. By examining omnivorism and care ethics in the context of these two sustainability dimensions, this paper finally proposes to provide insights into the complex interplay between moral values, consumption habits, and the long-term well-being of individuals and the planet.

Supporting Agencies

None

Keywords:

Care Ethics, Omnivorism, Empathy, Holistic Well-being, Sustainability

ABBATE C., 2019, Save the meat for the cats: Why it is wrong to eat roadkill, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(1): 165-182.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09763-6   Google Scholar

BAINES S., POWERS J., BROWN W. J., 2007, How does the health and well-being of young Australian vegetarian and semi-vegetarian women compare with non-vegetarians?, Public Health Nutrition, 10 (5): 436-442.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980007217938   Google Scholar

CHAMANARA S., GOLDSTEIN B., NEWALL J P., 2021, Where’s the beef? Costco’s meat supply chain and environ-mental justice in California, J. Clean. Product, 278(3): 123744.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123744   Google Scholar

COFNAS N., 2019, Is vegetarianism healthy for children?, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 59 (13): 2052-2060.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1437024   Google Scholar

CRAIG W. J., 2010, Nutrition concerns and health effects of vegetarian diets, Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 25(6): 613-620.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533610385707   Google Scholar

DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND DAIRYING, 2023, Animal husbandry statistics INDIA, https://dahd.nic.in/schemes/programmes/animal-husbandry-statistics (6.07.2023).
  Google Scholar

DOBRESEK U., WY G., ADKINS J., ALTMEYER S., KROUT K., CARL J., ARCHER E., 2021, Meat and Mental Health: a systematic review of meat abstention and depression, anxiety, and related phenomena, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 61(4): 622-635.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1741505   Google Scholar

ERNSTOFF A., TU Q., FAIST M., DEL DUCE A., MANDELBAUM S., DETTLING J., 2019, Comparing the envi-ronmental impacts of meatless and meat-containing meals in the United States, Sustainability, 11(22): 6235.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226235   Google Scholar

FISCHER B., 2016, Bugging the strict vegan, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29 (2): 255-263.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9599-y   Google Scholar

GILLIGAN C., 1982, In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press.
  Google Scholar

GONZALES J., 2019, As pesticide approvals soar, Brazil’s tapirs, bees, and other wildlife suffer, Mongabay, https://news.mongabay.com/2019/12/as-pesticide-approvals-soar-brazils-tapirs-bees-other-wildlifesuffer/ (06.11.2022).
  Google Scholar

GULLONE E., 2017, Why Eating Animals Is Not Good for Us, Journal of Animal Ethics, 7(1): 31-62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/janimalethics.7.1.0031   Google Scholar

HIBBELN J. R., NORTHSTONE K., EVANS J., GOLDING J., 2018, Vegetarian diets and depressive symptoms among men, Journal of Affective Disorders, 225(1): 13-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.051   Google Scholar

HAMILTON C., 2010, Requiem for a species, Earthscan, New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774970   Google Scholar

HERRING J., 2019, Ethics of Care and the Public Good of Abortion, University of Oxford Human Rights Hub Journal, 1: 1-24.
  Google Scholar

IGUACEL I., MIGUEL-BERGES M L., GOMEZ-BRUTON A., MORENO L. A., JULIAN C., 2019, Veganism, vege-tarianism, bone mineral density, and fracture risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Nutrition Reviews, 77 (1): 1-18.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuy045   Google Scholar

KASSER T., RYAN R. M., COUCHMAN C E., SHELDON K. M., 2004, Materialistic values: their causes and conse-quences, Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world, American Psychological Association, Washington DC: 11-28.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10658-002   Google Scholar

LEROY F., SMITH N., ADESOGAN A T., BEAL T., IANNOTTI L., MOUGHAN P. J., MANN N., 2023, The role of meat in the human diet: evolutionary aspects and nutritional value, Animal Frontiers, 13(2): 11-18.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfac093   Google Scholar

PARK S., 2017, Vegetarianism vs. Moral Omnivorism, Human Affairs, 27 (3): 289-300.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2017-0024   Google Scholar

ROSENFELD D. L., 2018, The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions, Appetite, 131(1): 125-138.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.011   Google Scholar

TRONTO J., 1993, Moral Boundaries, Routledge, New York.
  Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS, 2017, The sustainable development goals report 2017, https://doi.org/10.29171/azu_acku_pamphlet_k3240_s878_2016/.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2024-01-08

Cited by

Mukherjee, U., & Venkataraman, P. (2024). Re-evaluating the Alignment of Omnivorous Choice and Animal Farming with Sustainable Development: Insights from Care Ethics . Problemy Ekorozwoju, 19(1), 325–329. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5324

Authors

Upamita Mukherjee 
upamita.mukherjee@iitg.ac.in
Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guwahati India
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4571-7608

Authors

Prabhu Venkataraman 

Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guwahati India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-0792

Statistics

Abstract views: 166
PDF downloads: 351


License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.