Criteria of livable public spaces quality. Case study analysis on the example of selected public spaces Lublin, Poland
Agnieszka Chęć-Małyszek
a.chec-malyszek@pollub.plDepartment of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lublin University of Technology (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-0635
Abstract
The aim of the research presented in this paper was to assess the attractiveness of selected public spaces located in the downtown of Lublin in a specific moment of time - after the experience of the Covid-19 pandemic. The research made it possible to determine the predisposition of studied spaces to be places providing peace, relaxation, tranquility in which people willingly spend their free time. At the same time, the results of the questionnaires were confronted with the surveys of spaces according to Jan Gehl's methodology of 12 Quality Criteria of Successful, Livable Space. The aim of the study was to check whether the popularization of the idea of creating a city for the people has a real impact on the realization of the newest public spaces which can be considered as new landmarks for Lublin. Selected public spaces of different kinds were analyzes according to fulfilling 12 Quality Criteria and with user’s perception survey (questionnaire).
Keywords:
Livable Public Space, Public Green Spaces, User’s perception, IdentityReferences
Year of Jan Gehl in Lublin. Available online: http://yearofjangehl.ulublin.eu/ (accessed on 20 07 2021).
Google Scholar
Göçer Ö., Göçer K., Başol A.M., Kıraç M.F., Özbil A., Bakovic M., Siddiqui F.P., Özcan B., Introduction of a spatio-temporal mapping based POE method for outdoor spaces: Suburban university campus as a case study, Building and Environment 2018, Volume 145, pp. 125−139.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.012
Google Scholar
Gehl People, Available online: https://gehlpeople.com/people/, The Public Life Diversity Toolkit 2.0 (accessed on 05 05 2021).
Google Scholar
Gehl J., Life between buildings: Using public space.; Island Press: London 1971.
Google Scholar
Gehl J., Gemzoe L., Kirknaes S., Søndergaard B.S., New City Life, The Danish Architectural Press, 2006, further developed: Gehl Architects – Urban Quality Consultants, 2009.
Google Scholar
Niebylski M., Raport z badań ankietowych, Lublin 2021, Available online: https://lublin.eu/gfx/lublin/userfiles/_public/aktualnosci/2020/2021/diagnoza_lublin_2030._raport_z_badan_ankietowych.pdf.
Google Scholar
Maleszyk P., Czego potrzebuje Lublin? Raport z badania, jakości życia w dzielnicach Lublina, Raport o stanie miasta za 2019, opracowanie Urząd Miasta Lublina.; UM Lublin 2018. Available online: https://depot.ceon.pl/bitstream/handle/123456789/16547/%5B2018%5D_Czego_potrzebuje_Lublin_%5Braport_dzielnicowy%5D-skompresowany.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 25 08 2018).
Google Scholar
Lorens P., Tematyzacja przestrzeni publicznej, jako wyraz dywersyfikacji struktury urbanistycznej miasta doby globalizacji, In Percepcja współczesnej przestrzeni miejskiej, Madurowicz M., Eds.: Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2007, pp. 83−92.
Google Scholar
Hładkiewicz W., Koncepcja przestrzeni publicznej w teorii krytycznej Jürgena Habermasa, In Sfera publiczna. Kondycja – przejawy – przemiany.; Hudzik J.P., Woźniak W. Eds., Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Poland 2006, pp. 143−148.
Google Scholar
Cegłowska A., Matykowski R., Przestrzenie publiczne i ich znaczenie w dużym mieście: przypadek Poznania, Studia Miejskie, 2, Poland 2010, pp. 243−256.
Google Scholar
Markowski T., Przestrzeń publiczna wobec procesu metropolizacji, Urbanista, 7 (51), 2007, pp. 10−15.
Google Scholar
Bierwiaczonek K., Nawrocki T., Teoretyczne spojrzenie na przestrzeń publiczną, In Rynki, małe i cmentarze. Przestrzeń publiczna miast śląskich w ujęciu socjologicznym, Bierwiaczonek K., Lewicka B., Nawrocki T. Eds., Nomos, Kraków 2018.
Google Scholar
Trojanowska M., Urban design and therapeutic landscapes. Evolving theme, Budownictwo i Architektura 2021, 20(1), pp. 117−140. DOI: 10.35784/bud-arch.1987.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.1987
Google Scholar
Carmona M., de Magalhães C., Hammond L. Eds.; Public space. The management dimension, Taylor and Francis Group: France, London-New York, Routledge 2008, pp. 240.
Google Scholar
Leclercq E., Pojani D., van Bueren E., Is public space privatization always bad for the public? Mixed evidence from the United Kingdom, Cities 2020, Vol. 100.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102649
Google Scholar
Radović D., Boontharm D., Bruzzese A., Cairns S., Fikfak A., Klomp P., Kuma K., Cossio B.M., Medina A., Oguma E., Sim D., Sintusingha S., Verhoeven S., Urban Questions in the Times of Coronavirus. Responding to the Crisis of Public Space, The Journal of Public Space 2020, 5(2), pp. 233−248, DOI 10.32891/jps.v5i3.1362.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v5i3.1362
Google Scholar
Sepe M., Covid-19 pandemic and public spaces: improving quality and flexibility for healthier places, Urban Design International 2021, Volume 26, pp. 159−173, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-021-00153-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-021-00153-x
Google Scholar
Innocent T., Stevens Q., Urban Play as Catalyst for Social Wellbeing Post-Pandemic, 2021, Front. Comput. Sci. 3:634145. doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2021.634145.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.634145
Google Scholar
Aiswarya Raj S., Angella E.J., Pooja C., Impact of Covid-19 in shaping new resilient urban planning approach, Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2021, Volume 1114, 6th Biennial International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering Science and Technology (ICETEST 2020) 17th-19th December 2020, Kerala, India.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1114/1/012040
Google Scholar
Honey-Rosés J., Anguelovski I., Chireh V.K., Daher C., Konijnendijk van den Bosch C., Litt J.S., Mawani V., Michael K. McCall, Orellana A., Oscilowicz E., Sánchez U., Senbel M., Tan X., Villagomez E., Zapata O., & Nieuwenhuijsen M.J., The impact of COVID-19 on public space: an early review of the emerging questions – design, perceptions and inequities, Cities & Health 2020, pp. 1−20. DOI: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074
Google Scholar
Zandieh R., Nieuwenhuijsen M., Zandieh M., Adaptability of Public Spaces and Mental Health Inequalities during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Journal of Urban Design and Mental Health 2020, 6:5. https://www.urbandesignmentalhealth.com/journal-6-covid19-public-spaces.html.
Google Scholar
Cackowski J.M., Nasar J.L., The restorative effects of roadside vegetation implications for automobile driver anger and frustration, Environment and Behaviour 2003, 35(6), pp. 736−751.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503256267
Google Scholar
Mangone G., Exploring urban design strategies that maximize the benefits of urban nature for children’s well-being, Ecopsychology 2018, 10(4), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0054.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0054
Google Scholar
Jennings V., Bamkole O., The Relationship between Social Cohesion and Urban Green Space: An Avenue for Health Promotion. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019, 4;16(3), pp. 452. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030452. PMID: 30720732; PMCID: PMC6388234.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030452
Google Scholar
Kondo M.C., Fluehr J.M., McKeon T., Branas C.C., Urban Green Space and Its Impact on Human Health, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(3), pp. 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030445.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030445
Google Scholar
Bil J.S., Buława B., Świerzawski J., Mental Health and the City in the Post-COVID-19 Era, Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 7533. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147533.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147533
Google Scholar
Tzoulas K., Korpela K., Venn S., Yli-Pelkonen V., Kaźmierczak A., Niemela J., James P., Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review, Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, Volume 81, Issue 3, pp. 167−178. ISSN 0169 2046, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
Google Scholar
Shanahan D.F., Astell-Burt T., Barber E.A., Brymer E., Cox D.T.C., Dean J., Depledge M., Fuller R.A., Hartig T., Irvine K.N., Jones A., Kikillus H., Lovell R., Mitchell R., Niemelä J., Nieuwenhuijsen M., Pretty J., Townsend M., van Heezik Y., Warber S., Gaston K.J., Nature – Based Interventions for Improving Health and Wellbeing, The Purpose, the People and the Outcomes, Sports 2019, 7, pp. 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7060141.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7060141
Google Scholar
Van Gordon W., Shonin E., Richardson M., Mindfulness and Nature, Science+Business Media, LLC, Springer Mindfulness, 2018, pp. 1655−1658.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0883-6
Google Scholar
Pritchard A., Richardson M., Sheffield D., McEwan K., The Relationship Between Nature Connectedness and Eudaimonic Well-Being: A Meta-analysis, Journal of Happiness Studies 2020, Volume 21, pp. 1145−1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6
Google Scholar
Hewitt C.N., Ashworth K., MacKenzie A.R., Using green infrastructure to improve urban air quality (GI4AQ), Ambio A Journal of Environment and Societ 2020; 49, pp. 62−73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01164-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01164-3
Google Scholar
Hostetler Allen W., Meurk C., Conserving urban biodiversity? Creating green infrastructure is only the first step, Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, Volume 100, Issue 4, pp. 369−371. ISSN 0169-2046, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.011
Google Scholar
Cudny W., Appelblad H., Monuments and their functions in urban public space, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 2019, 73:5, pp.273−289. DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2019.1694976.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1694976
Google Scholar
Grodach C., Art spaces, public space, and the link to community development, Community Development Journal 2010, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp. 474−493, https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsp018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsp018
Google Scholar
Sequeira Á., Ephemeral Art in Impermanent Spaces: The Effects of Street Art in the Social Construction of Public Space, In Urban Interventions: Street Art and Public Space, Costa, P.; Neves, P.,S.; Guerra, P.; Eds.;, Lisboa: 2016, pp. 65−74. urbancreativity.org.
Google Scholar
Jażdżewska I., Murals as a Tourist Attraction in a Post-Industrial City: A Case Study of Łódź (Poland), Tourism 2018, 27(2); pp. 45−56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tour-2017-0012
Google Scholar
Honghao He, Wu M., Gyergyak J., Intervention and renewal − Interpretation of installation art in urban public space, Pollack Periodica, An International Journal for Engineering and Information Sciences, AKJ Journals, DOI: 10.1556/606.2021.00362.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2021.00362
Google Scholar
Szostak A.J., Methodology of visual art localization in public spaces, on example of Poznan City, Town Planning and Architecture 2007, XXXI(1), pp. 29−38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/13921630.2007.10697086
Google Scholar
Szostak A.J., The role of public visual art in urban space recognition, In Cognitive Maps, Perusich, K., Edt.; Croatia: INTECH, 2010, pp. 75−100.
Google Scholar
Dziadzia B., Głyda-Żydek B., Piskorek-Oczko S., Eds., Artystyczne wymiary wytwarzania kapitału społecznego i kulturowego, red. Fundacja Animacji Społeczno-Kulturalnej Bielsko-Biała, Cieszyn 2015.
Google Scholar
Rzymełka-Frąckiewicz A., Wilk T., Sztuka w przestrzeni społecznej – wymiar artystyczny i edukacyjny „Chowanna”, 2019. pp. 369−382.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31261/CHOWANNA.2019.S.20
Google Scholar
Zebracki M., Public art as conversation piece: scaling art, public space and audience, Belgeo, 2014, 3, Online since 19 December 2014, connection on 20 April 2019, http://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/13381; DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.13381.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.13381
Google Scholar
Przesmycka N., Boguszewska K., Landscaping of green areas in the urban layout of midtown Lublin, TEKA, 2020, Vol. 4, Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych, Oddział Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Lublinie, pp. 70−85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.2426
Google Scholar
Pietrzyk B., Wielokulturowy Lublin: komunikacja przestrzeni fizycznej i społecznej. Pogranicze, Polish Borderlands Studies 2016, t. 4, nr 2, pp. 281−297.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/ppbs409
Google Scholar
Trzaskowska R., Adamiec P., Diagnoza stanu i walorów parków miejskich Lublina oraz wytyczne do ich kształtowania, Teka Kom. Arch. Urb. Stud. Krajobr. – OL PAN, 2012, VIII/1, pp. 7−18. https://journals.pan.pl/Content/94317/mainfile.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.2489
Google Scholar
Whyte W.H., The social life of small urban spaces, Project for Public Spaces, New York, 2001.
Google Scholar
Project for Public Spaces. What makes a successful place? 2018, Available from: http://www.pps.org/topics/gps/gr_place_feat. (accessed on 20 05 2021).
Google Scholar
Authors
Agnieszka Chęć-Małyszeka.chec-malyszek@pollub.pl
Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lublin University of Technology Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-0635
Statistics
Abstract views: 380PDF downloads: 335
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.