Innovative Architectural Learning: A Case Study on Multidisciplinary and Experiential Teaching Methods
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024)
-
Research issues of church architecture on the eastern borderlands of Poland
Kostiantyn Pinkovskyi, Jan Wrana7-13
-
Children's painting as a tool for communicating needs and values in terms of spatial planning
Aleksandra Sztorc, Jagoda Wawszczak, Paweł Wiśniewski14-22
-
Innovative Architectural Learning: A Case Study on Multidisciplinary and Experiential Teaching Methods
Luis Moreira Pinto, Muhammet Emin Guner23-41
-
Pavilion of the Lusatian Culture Archaeological Reserve in Częstochowa-Raków – a Case Study
Emilia Malec-Zięba42-50
-
Seasonality in the Design of the Environment of a Hotel Facility on the Example of the Rest House for Employees of Lublin University of Technology in Kazimierz Dolny
Damian Hołownia, Dominika Lisiewska51-61
-
Optimal parking solutions in a limited space: analysis for the area around the Rest House for Employees of Lublin University of Technology in Kazimierz Dolny
Aleksandra Sztorc, Aleksandra Typek62-72
-
Dialogue between history and modernity in the preservation of historical ruins: The case of Helfštýn Castle
Katarzyna Drobek, Tetyana Kashchenko73-88
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 3
2024-12-27 7
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2024-12-27 7
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2024-12-27 8
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2023-12-29 11
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2023-12-19 13
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2022-12-30 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2022-12-27 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2022-12-27 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2022-12-27 4
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2021-12-30 11
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2021-12-30 9
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2021-12-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2021-12-30 8
-
Vol. 16 No. 4
2020-12-30 11
-
Vol. 16 No. 3
2020-09-30 10
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2020-06-30 11
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2020-03-31 10
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This study explores an innovative approach to architectural education, integrating multidisciplinary and experiential practices to enhance student creativity, spatial perception, and problem-solving skills. Traditional studio-based teaching methods are reimagined by incorporating diverse activities such as storytelling, sketching, filmmaking, and scenario development. These methods encourage students to develop multidimensional thinking and effectively communicate complex design ideas.
The research unfolds in two main phases: the transformation of a mundane urban space into a city attraction and the subsequent marketing of the design. Students engage in hands-on activities, including observational drawing, narrative construction, comic book creation, and short film production, fostering a deeper understanding of spatial dynamics and user engagement. Feedback sessions and peer evaluations ensure iterative learning and practical application.
A case study involving the redesign of a "boring" street demonstrates the efficacy of this methodology, revealing increased student motivation, creativity, and interdisciplinary collaboration. However, challenges such as balancing regulatory compliance with creative exploration and the limited integration of advanced digital tools like 3D modeling and virtual reality were identified. The study underscores the necessity of adapting architectural curricula to meet contemporary professional demands, emphasizing user-centered design and advanced technological integration.
This alternative pedagogical framework highlights the importance of fostering cultural exchange, peer learning, and professional preparedness. While the findings suggest a positive impact on student engagement and skill development, maintaining academic rigor within this gamified and interactive learning environment remains crucial. Ultimately, this approach not only prepares students for the complexities of modern architectural practice but also inspires innovative contributions to society.
Keywords:
References
Achten, Henri; Koszewski, Krzysztof; Martens, Bob. “What Happened after the ‘Hype’ on Virtual Design Studios? Some Considerations for a Roundtable Discussion.” In: University of Ljubljana (ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International eCAADe Conference, Ljubljana, 2011, s. 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2011.023
Akyıldız, E. C. (2020). The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, October 2020 Volume 10 Issue 4, p. 389-407. DOI: 10.7456/11004100/005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7456/11004100/005
Alburgawi, S.A. and Al-Gamdi, M.A. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on architecture design studio pedagogy in Saudi Arabia. Open House International. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OHI-12-2020-0178 /13.04.2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-12-2020-0178
Amidon, Edmund J. (1967). The Role of the Teacher in the Classroom: A manual for understanding and improving teachers’ classroom behavior. Association for Productive Teaching. New York.
Aydınlı, S. (2014). “Paralaks oda: ‘Öğrenmeyi öğrenme’ ortamı olarak stüdyo.” Semra Aydınlı ve Burçin Kürtüncü (der.), Paralaks Oda, İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi, s.10-31.
Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056
Çobanoğlu, Y. Ş. (2018). 6 mimar ve akademisyenin mimarlık eğitim modeli üzerine düşünceleri. Yapı Dergisi. https://yapidergisi.com/6-mimar-ve-akademisyenin-mimarlik-egitim-modeli-uzerine-dusunceleri/.
Deldjoo, Y.; Elahi, M.; Cremonesi, P.; Garzotto, F.; Piazzolla, P. (2016). Recommending Movies Based on Mise-en-Scene Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ‘16), New York, NY, USA, 7–12 May 2016; pp. 1540–1547. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.289255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892551
Dutton, T. A. (Ed.). (1991). Voices in architectural education: Cultural politics and pedagogy. Bergin & Garvey. https://doi.org/10.2307/1425098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1991.11102671
Evans, R. (1997). Translations from Drawing to Building and Other Essays. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
Gagné, R. and Briggs, L.J. (1974). Principles of Instructional Design. Holton, Rinehart & Winston, New York Press.
Jansen, S.; Boumeester, H.; Coolen, H.; Goetgeluk, R.; Molin, E. (2011). The effect of presentation: What you see is what you value. J. Archit. Plan. Res., 28, 181–193. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43030940.
Kim, J. J.-Y. (2024, February 28). Rethinking architecture education: Learning from practice. DesignIntelligence. https://www.di.net/di-media/articles/2024-quarterly/09-rethinking-architecture-education-learning-from-practice-julie-kim/.
Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Architectural Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080454979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080454979
Malec-Zięba, E. (2023). Habitat – structure and form, design experience in teaching interior design. Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki I Studiów Krajobrazowych, 19(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.5627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.5627
Park, Eun Joo, and Mi Jeong Kim. (2021). Visual Communication for Students’ Creative Thinking in the Design Studio: Translating Filmic Spaces into Spatial Design. Buildings, 11(3): 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030091
Park, J.; Jin, Y.; Ahn, S.; Lee, S. (2019). The Impact of Design Representation on Visual Perception: Comparing Eye-Tracking Data of Architectural Scenes Between Photography and Line Drawing. Arch. Des. Res., 32, 5–29. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2019.02.32.1.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2019.02.32.1.5
Rajagopalan, I. (2019). Concept of Teaching. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(2), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i2.329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i2.329
Runco, M. (2008). Commentary: Divergent Thinking Is Not Synonymous With Creativity. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts, 2, 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93
Saghafi, R. M., Mozaffar, F., Moosavi, S. M., Fathi, N. (2015). Teaching Methods in Architectural Design Basics. Ciência e Natura, 37(6-1), 378–387. http://doi.org/105902/2179460X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20868
Pinto, L.M., Rodrigues, T.(2022). The importance of art and architecture regarding the idea that we have about a city. AIP Conf. Proc. 15 November 2022; 2574 (1): 030001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0117647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0117647
Şekerci, Y., Danacı, M. H., Kaynakçı, Z. K. E. (2021). Uzaktan eğitimin uygulamalı derslerde sürdürülebilirliği: mimarlık bölümleri örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.29048/makufebed.874055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29048/makufebed.874055
Swarooprani, K. (2022). An Study of Research Methodology. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2293175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2293175
Şuta, O. (2022). Covid-19 Pandemisi ile Değişen Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminin Öğrenci Üzerindeki Etkileri: Trakya Üniversitesi Mimarlık Bölümü Örneği. Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 15(4), 1549. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1129614%20x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1129614
Yılmaz, D. R., Polat, S. (2020). Mimarlık ve Yaşam Dergisi Cilt: 5, No: 2, Published at Architecture and Life, 2020 (443). DOI: 10.26835/my.746719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26835/my.746719
Article Details
Abstract views: 241
Luis Moreira Pinto, CIAUD-UBI, Beira Interior University (UBI), Civil Engeneering and Architecture Department (DECA), Covilhã, Portugal
Luis Moreira Pinto is an academic and professional in architecture, with a career marked by innovation, interdisciplinarity, and international engagement. Currently serving as a Professor at the University of Beira Interior, Drawing 2 coordinator and ERASMUS coordinator, he has been an integral part of the institution since 2004. His academic qualifications include two doctoral degrees: one in Architecture (2021), focusing on the urban identity of Lisbon's Baixa Pombalina, and another in History (2008), exploring perception in architectural processes, also have a Master degree (pre-Bolonha) in Theory of Architecture, 1997.
His contributions span education, research, and practice. He has taught at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, specializing in design and project coordination, and played a pivotal role in transitioning his department’s programs to meet Bolonha standards, including the Integrated Master's model. Beyond teaching, he has mentored numerous master's and doctoral candidates and spearheaded international collaborations through ERASMUS and other exchange programs, cementing his department’s global outreach.
His research interests revolve around urban design, perception, and the emotional impact of architectural elements such as color and form. These themes converge in projects like "LikePlace," a mobile app evaluating urban atmospheres, showcasing his commitment to blending technology with spatial design. As a prolific scholar, he has published over 60 scientific papers in high-impact journals, contributed to books, and participated in numerous international conferences as a speaker and panelist.
Muhammet Emin Guner , Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Architecture, Isparta, Turkey
He is a Master student with experience in Virtual reality programs. Also made Internship at Universidade da Beira Interior in 2024.

