Innovative Architectural Learning: A Case Study on Multidisciplinary and Experiential Teaching Methods
Luis Moreira Pinto
lmoreirapinto.arq@gmail.comCIAUD-UBI, Beira Interior University (UBI), Civil Engeneering and Architecture Department (DECA), Covilhã, Portugal (Portugal)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-0294
Muhammet Emin Guner
Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Architecture, Isparta, Turkey (Turkey)
Abstract
This study explores an innovative approach to architectural education, integrating multidisciplinary and experiential practices to enhance student creativity, spatial perception, and problem-solving skills. Traditional studio-based teaching methods are reimagined by incorporating diverse activities such as storytelling, sketching, filmmaking, and scenario development. These methods encourage students to develop multidimensional thinking and effectively communicate complex design ideas.
The research unfolds in two main phases: the transformation of a mundane urban space into a city attraction and the subsequent marketing of the design. Students engage in hands-on activities, including observational drawing, narrative construction, comic book creation, and short film production, fostering a deeper understanding of spatial dynamics and user engagement. Feedback sessions and peer evaluations ensure iterative learning and practical application.
A case study involving the redesign of a "boring" street demonstrates the efficacy of this methodology, revealing increased student motivation, creativity, and interdisciplinary collaboration. However, challenges such as balancing regulatory compliance with creative exploration and the limited integration of advanced digital tools like 3D modeling and virtual reality were identified. The study underscores the necessity of adapting architectural curricula to meet contemporary professional demands, emphasizing user-centered design and advanced technological integration.
This alternative pedagogical framework highlights the importance of fostering cultural exchange, peer learning, and professional preparedness. While the findings suggest a positive impact on student engagement and skill development, maintaining academic rigor within this gamified and interactive learning environment remains crucial. Ultimately, this approach not only prepares students for the complexities of modern architectural practice but also inspires innovative contributions to society.
Keywords:
Architectural Education, Multidisciplinary Learning, Creative Pedagogy, Spatial Perception, Design Thinking, Experiential LearningReferences
Achten, Henri; Koszewski, Krzysztof; Martens, Bob. “What Happened after the ‘Hype’ on Virtual Design Studios? Some Considerations for a Roundtable Discussion.” In: University of Ljubljana (ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International eCAADe Conference, Ljubljana, 2011, s. 24.
Google Scholar
Akyıldız, E. C. (2020). The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, October 2020 Volume 10 Issue 4, p. 389-407. DOI: 10.7456/11004100/005.
Google Scholar
Alburgawi, S.A. and Al-Gamdi, M.A. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on architecture design studio pedagogy in Saudi Arabia. Open House International. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OHI-12-2020-0178 /13.04.2021.
Google Scholar
Amidon, Edmund J. (1967). The Role of the Teacher in the Classroom: A manual for understanding and improving teachers’ classroom behavior. Association for Productive Teaching. New York.
Google Scholar
Aydınlı, S. (2014). “Paralaks oda: ‘Öğrenmeyi öğrenme’ ortamı olarak stüdyo.” Semra Aydınlı ve Burçin Kürtüncü (der.), Paralaks Oda, İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi, s.10-31.
Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056.
Google Scholar
Çobanoğlu, Y. Ş. (2018). 6 mimar ve akademisyenin mimarlık eğitim modeli üzerine düşünceleri. Yapı Dergisi. https://yapidergisi.com/6-mimar-ve-akademisyenin-mimarlik-egitim-modeli-uzerine-dusunceleri/.
Google Scholar
Deldjoo, Y.; Elahi, M.; Cremonesi, P.; Garzotto, F.; Piazzolla, P. (2016). Recommending Movies Based on Mise-en-Scene Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ‘16), New York, NY, USA, 7–12 May 2016; pp. 1540–1547. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.289255.
Google Scholar
Dutton, T. A. (Ed.). (1991). Voices in architectural education: Cultural politics and pedagogy. Bergin & Garvey. https://doi.org/10.2307/1425098.
Google Scholar
Evans, R. (1997). Translations from Drawing to Building and Other Essays. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
Google Scholar
Gagné, R. and Briggs, L.J. (1974). Principles of Instructional Design. Holton, Rinehart & Winston, New York Press.
Google Scholar
Jansen, S.; Boumeester, H.; Coolen, H.; Goetgeluk, R.; Molin, E. (2011). The effect of presentation: What you see is what you value. J. Archit. Plan. Res., 28, 181–193. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43030940.
Google Scholar
Kim, J. J.-Y. (2024, February 28). Rethinking architecture education: Learning from practice. DesignIntelligence. https://www.di.net/di-media/articles/2024-quarterly/09-rethinking-architecture-education-learning-from-practice-julie-kim/.
Google Scholar
Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Architectural Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080454979.
Google Scholar
Malec-Zięba, E. (2023). Habitat – structure and form, design experience in teaching interior design. Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki I Studiów Krajobrazowych, 19(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.5627.
Google Scholar
Park, Eun Joo, and Mi Jeong Kim. (2021). Visual Communication for Students’ Creative Thinking in the Design Studio: Translating Filmic Spaces into Spatial Design. Buildings, 11(3): 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030091.
Google Scholar
Park, J.; Jin, Y.; Ahn, S.; Lee, S. (2019). The Impact of Design Representation on Visual Perception: Comparing Eye-Tracking Data of Architectural Scenes Between Photography and Line Drawing. Arch. Des. Res., 32, 5–29. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2019.02.32.1.5.
Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, I. (2019). Concept of Teaching. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(2), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i2.329.
Google Scholar
Runco, M. (2008). Commentary: Divergent Thinking Is Not Synonymous With Creativity. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts, 2, 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93.
Google Scholar
Saghafi, R. M., Mozaffar, F., Moosavi, S. M., Fathi, N. (2015). Teaching Methods in Architectural Design Basics. Ciência e Natura, 37(6-1), 378–387. http://doi.org/105902/2179460X.
Google Scholar
Pinto, L.M., Rodrigues, T.(2022). The importance of art and architecture regarding the idea that we have about a city. AIP Conf. Proc. 15 November 2022; 2574 (1): 030001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0117647.
Google Scholar
Şekerci, Y., Danacı, M. H., Kaynakçı, Z. K. E. (2021). Uzaktan eğitimin uygulamalı derslerde sürdürülebilirliği: mimarlık bölümleri örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.29048/makufebed.874055.
Google Scholar
Swarooprani, K. (2022). An Study of Research Methodology. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2293175.
Google Scholar
Şuta, O. (2022). Covid-19 Pandemisi ile Değişen Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminin Öğrenci Üzerindeki Etkileri: Trakya Üniversitesi Mimarlık Bölümü Örneği. Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 15(4), 1549. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1129614%20x.
Google Scholar
Yılmaz, D. R., Polat, S. (2020). Mimarlık ve Yaşam Dergisi Cilt: 5, No: 2, Published at Architecture and Life, 2020 (443). DOI: 10.26835/my.746719.
Google Scholar
Authors
Luis Moreira Pintolmoreirapinto.arq@gmail.com
CIAUD-UBI, Beira Interior University (UBI), Civil Engeneering and Architecture Department (DECA), Covilhã, Portugal Portugal
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-0294
Luis Moreira Pinto is an academic and professional in architecture, with a career marked by innovation, interdisciplinarity, and international engagement. Currently serving as a Professor at the University of Beira Interior, Drawing 2 coordinator and ERASMUS coordinator, he has been an integral part of the institution since 2004. His academic qualifications include two doctoral degrees: one in Architecture (2021), focusing on the urban identity of Lisbon's Baixa Pombalina, and another in History (2008), exploring perception in architectural processes, also have a Master degree (pre-Bolonha) in Theory of Architecture, 1997.
His contributions span education, research, and practice. He has taught at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, specializing in design and project coordination, and played a pivotal role in transitioning his department’s programs to meet Bolonha standards, including the Integrated Master's model. Beyond teaching, he has mentored numerous master's and doctoral candidates and spearheaded international collaborations through ERASMUS and other exchange programs, cementing his department’s global outreach.
His research interests revolve around urban design, perception, and the emotional impact of architectural elements such as color and form. These themes converge in projects like "LikePlace," a mobile app evaluating urban atmospheres, showcasing his commitment to blending technology with spatial design. As a prolific scholar, he has published over 60 scientific papers in high-impact journals, contributed to books, and participated in numerous international conferences as a speaker and panelist.
Authors
Muhammet Emin GunerSuleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Architecture, Isparta, Turkey Turkey
He is a Master student with experience in Virtual reality programs. Also made Internship at Universidade da Beira Interior in 2024.
Statistics
Abstract views: 2PDF downloads: 28
