Pierre Nora’s "Sites of Memory" and the Social Aspect of Issues in Built Heritage Conservation
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 12 (2021)
-
Pierre Nora’s "Sites of Memory" and the Social Aspect of Issues in Built Heritage Conservation
Janusz Krawczyk, Małgorzata Balcer1-12
-
Learning from the Abode of Chaos : Institutions, Stakeholders and Contemporary Challenges of Conservation Doctrine
Claudine Houbart13-24
-
Archeological Monuments Protection System. Between Theory and Conservation Practice
Agnieszka Krawczewska25-34
-
Conservation Doctrines and the Pan-European Idea of the New European Bauhaus and the European Green Deal
Marcin Włodarczyk, Małgorzata Włodarczyk35-54
-
Alert in the 21st Century. Changes in Theory of Heritage Protection in Tangible, Intangible and Digital Signs
Iwona Szmelter55-70
-
Urban Conservation in International Charters
From the Athens Charter to the Historic Urban Landscape RecommendationRuxandra-Iulia Stoica71-78 -
The Climate Change Related Adaptation and Resilience of Traditional Tradicional Dwellings: the Case of Yucatan Penisula
Joel Audefroy, Bertha Nelly Cabrera Sanchez79-96
-
Conservation Practice and the Future of Doctrinal Texts
Nigel Walter97-112
-
The Congress of Athens of 1931: Methodological and Technical Contributions for the Conservation of Architectural and Environmental Heritage
Rosa Anna Genovese113-121
-
Reflections on Integral and Integrated Heritage Care at the Threshold of the Third Millennium
Marc Laenen123-138
-
World Heritage for Building Peace
Paolo Del Bianco141-147
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The following article addresses the usefulness of Noraʼs concept of a ʻsite of memoryʼ for the preservation and interpretation of those historic buildings and structures which already enjoy legal protection as monument. First, the denotations of Pierre Noraʼs notion of lieux de mémoire and Alois Rieglʼs concept of a Denkmal (or monument) are juxtaposed. Second, the paper presents the methodological problems involved in studying sites of memory, and offers guidelines inspired by Aleida and Jan Assmanʼs works on cultural memory. Third, these theoretical notions are then related to practical experience gathered while completing a project devoted to “Church of Peace in Jawor as a site of memory”; insights from the project lead to conclusions regarding the possibility of studying the social aspects of built heritage conservation. The conclusion of the paper identifies the characteristics and features of lieux de mémoire which may assist in the identification of places of memory from the perspective of heritage protection.
Keywords:
References
Allier-Montano, E. (2008). Lugar de memoria: ¿un concepto para el análisis de las luchas memoriales? El caso de Uruguay y su pasado reciente, Guadernos del CLAEH, 96-97 (1-2), 87-109.
Assmann, A. (1996). Im Zwischenraum zwischen Geschichte und Gedächtnis. Bemerkungen zu Pierre Noras “Lieux de mémoire”. In: Les lieux de mémoire/Erinnerungsorte. D’un modèle français à un projet allemande. (19-27): Berlin: Centre Marc Bloch.
Assmann, A. (2003). Speichergedächtnis und Funktionsgedächtnis in Geschichte und Gegenwart. In: Wir sind Erinnerung, Berner Universitätsschriften. (181-196): Bern: Haupt Verlag.
Assmann, J. (2008). Communicative and Cultural Memory, in: Cultural Memory Studies. As International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. (109-118): Berlin, New York, de Gruyter.
Balcer, M. (2017). The Protestant Church of Peace ‘of the Holy Spirit’ in Jawor: A lieu de mémoire for Germans and Poles. In: The Luther Effect in Eastern Europe: History, Culture, Memory. (295-303): Oldenbourg: De Gruyter.
François, E. & Schulze, H. (2008). Einleitung. In: Deutsche Erinnerungsorte. (9-24): Műnchen: Beck.
Jokilehto, J. (2008). The idea of conservation. An overiew. In: Conservation and Preservation. Interactions between Theory and Practice. In memoriam Alois Riegl (1858-1905). (21-35): Firenze: Polistampa.
Krawczyk, J. (2018). Places of memory as a subject of theoretical reflection in heritage conservation. Protection of Cultural Heritage, (5), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.861
Krawczyk, J. (2020). Nazwać, żeby ocalić. Klasycy myśli konserwatorskiej wobec reliktów przeszłości. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Nora, P. (1978). Mémoire collective. In: La nouvelle histoire. (398-401): Paris: Retz.
Nora, P. (1986). Comment écrire l’histoire de France. In: Les lieux de mémoire. (Vol. II, 2226-2230): Paris: Gallimard.
Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire, Representations 26, 7-24.
Nora, P. (1996). From lieux de mémoire to realms of memory. In: Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past. (Vol. 1, XV-XXIV): New York, Chichester: Columbia University Press.
Nora, P. (2002, April 19). The Reasons for the Current Upsurge in Memory, Transit 22. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from https://www.eurozine.com/reasons-for-the-current-upsurge-in-memory/
Pomian, K. (2006). Historia, nauka wobec pamięci. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej.
Riegl, A. (1903). Der Moderne Denkmalkultus, sein Wesen, seine Entstehung, Vien, Lepzig: Braumüller.
Schaaf, U. (2019). Die Baugeschichte der Friedenskirche Jauer im Spiegel des bautechnischen Befundes sowie der schriftlichen und bildlichen Quellen: ein Beitrag zur Entwicklung einer arteigenen Methode der bauhistorischen Erforschung von Fachwerkbauten, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika,.
Traba, R. & Hahn H.-H. & Kończal K. & Górny M. (Eds.) (2012-15). Polsko-niemieckie miejsca pamięci, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Article Details
Abstract views: 496
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
