Transformation of Historic Buildings – an Attempt at Codification
Abstract
Civilization development and the related changes in functional, technological, and aesthetic standards are connected with the transformations of the existing buildings, including architectural monuments. Non-conservationist needs and the scale of these transformations influence the reevaluation of the architectural heritage protection paradigm. An important manifestation of this, following the political transformation in Poland after 1989, is the interdependence between effective protection of historic buildings and their utilization. This entails the necessity of modernization and adaptation interventions, i.e. changes of internal divisions and the need to expand the usable area by extending the historic buildings or premises, or construction of new ones in their immediate vicinity. Therefore, the protection of historic monuments requires the integration of activities that preserve the documentary values of the historic fabric with the principles of its adaptation to the current utilitarian needs - as the condition of the monuments' survival. In systematizing the principles of transformation, it is necessary to organize the nomenclature of activities undertaken in relation to historical buildings, which is crucial for the understanding of the principles of protection and dialogue between the participants of conservation and modernization processes. The aim of this paper is: to outline the views on the interference in the monumental structures in the development of Polish conservator's thought as a starting point for the codification of the interference; to diagnose the important conditions which determine the transformation of monuments and the need for dialogue between the participants in the conservation and modernization projects; to try to define the types of transformations with their characteristics, and to formulate conclusions.
Keywords:
monuments, transformations, codificationReferences
Gruszecki A., Łysiak W. (1974), Propozycja nowej wersji Karty Weneckiej, Architektura nr 1-2, s. 3-21.
Google Scholar
Kurzątkowski M. (1993), Neohistoryzm konserwatorski, Ochrona Zabytków, nr 3, s. 225-226.
Google Scholar
Lubocka-Hoffmann M. (2001), W poszukiwaniu tożsamości Balijska. Retro-wersja miasta w oparciu o doświadczenia Elbląga, Tożsamość miasta odbudowanego; autentyzm – integralność – kontynuacja; Gdańsk, s. 66.
Google Scholar
Muczkowski J. (1914), Ochrona zabytków, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Müller S. (1974), Współczesna forma architektoniczna w ośrodkach zabytkowych w Polsce po 1956 roku, Architektura, nr 1 -2, s. 22–28.
Google Scholar
Szmygin B. (2000), Kształtowanie koncepcji zabytku i doktryny konserwatorskiej w Polsce w XX wieku, Lublin, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej, s. 223.
Google Scholar
Tajchman J., Arszyński M. (1972), Wybrane zagadnienia słownictwa konserwatorskiego w dziedzinie zabytków architektury – na tle analizy podstawowych pojęć, Kwartalnik Architektury i Urbanistyki, t. XVII, nr 3, s. 236–238.
Google Scholar
Tomaszewski A (2012), Konserwacja pomiędzy „estetyką” a autentyzmem w: Święcka E. red. Ku nowej filozofii dziedzictwa, Kraków, Międzynarodowe Centrum Kultury, s. 119-120.
Google Scholar
Authors
Piotr Molskipemol601@gmail.com
Faculty of Architecture, Warsaw University of Technology Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 189PDF downloads: 230
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.