Committee decisions impact on the World Heritage List: breaking the balance
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 17 (2023)
-
35 years of World Heritage in the UK – challenges and opportunities
Chris Blandford1-16
-
34 years and counting: the so far experience of World Heritage assets in Thessaloniki, Greece
Dimitrios Zygomalas17-33
-
UNESCO World Heritage Convention – mission and commitment in times of challenges: lessons learnt from World Heritage Cities in Northwest-Europe and North-America
Matthias Ripp, Elena Arndt, Monika Göttler35-53
-
The 50 years of the World Heritage Convention in Spain: implementation, effects, and challenges
Mónica Luengo, Celia Martínez, Xavier Casanovas, Maider Maraña, Jordi Tresserras, Cristina Lafuente55-65
-
Introduction of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention at institutional level and on legal terms. The Hungarian example
Melinda Harlov-Csortán67-82
-
World Heritage at 50: policy and practice – key achievements and major challenges
Mechtild Rössler83-95
-
Changing the game: the case of cultural landscapes
David Jacques97-104
-
World Heritage as a balancing act: experiences from a medium-sized World Heritage City in Bavaria
Patricia Alberth105-114
-
Committee decisions impact on the World Heritage List: breaking the balance
Iva Zunjic115-128
-
Application of experience gleaned from the WHL system in national heritage protection systems – opportunities and benefits
Bogusław Szmygin129-136
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This paper represents a part of my PhD study which aims to identify anomalies in the procedure of inscribing properties on the World Heritage List through a comparative study of the recommendations of the advisory bodies and of the final decisions taken by the World Heritage Committee between 2010 and 2019 and how they indirectly affect the credibility and the future of the 1972 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. How is the procedure evolving and what distortions can be identified between the stated principles and the inscriptions on the List? How does this influence the evolution of the World Heritage List and the concept of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV)?
Keywords:
References
Cameron Ch., Evolution of the application of “outstanding universal value” for cultural and natural heritage, UNESCO, WHC-05/29.COM/INF.9B. Paris, 15 June 2005.
Davallon J., Le don du patrimoine : une approche communicationnelle de la patrimonialisation, Paris, Hermès science publications Lavoisier, 2006.
UNESCO, Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, Adopted by the General Conference at its seventeenth session, Paris, 16 November 1972, UNESCO.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, WHC.21/01, 31 July 2021.
UNESCO, The Budapest Declaration on World Heritage, WHC-02/CONF.202/5, Paris, 6 May 2002.
UNESCO, WHC-10/34.COM/20, Paris 2010.
UNESCO, WHC-10/34.COM/INF.8B1, Paris 2010.
UNESCO, WHC-10/34.COM/INF.8B1.Add, Paris 2010.
UNESCO, WHC-10/34.COM/INF.8B2, Paris 2010.
UNESCO, WHC-11/35.COM/20, Paris 2011.
UNESCO, WHC-11/35.COM/INF.8B1, Paris 2011.
UNESCO, WHC-11/35.COM/INF.8B1.Add, Paris 2011.
UNESCO, WHC-11/35.COM/INF.8B2, Paris 2011.
UNESCO, WHC-12/36.COM/19, Paris 2012.
UNESCO, WHC-12/36.COM/INF.8B1, Paris 2012.
UNESCO, WHC-12/36.COM/INF.8B1.Add, Paris 2012.
UNESCO, WHC-12/36.COM/INF.8B2, Paris 2012.
UNESCO, WHC-13/37.COM/20, Paris 2013.
UNESCO, WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B1, Paris 2013.
UNESCO, WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B1.Add, Paris 2013.
UNESCO, WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B2, Paris 2013.
UNESCO, WHC-13/37.COM/INF.8B2.Add, Paris 2013.
UNESCO, WHC-14/38.COM/20, Paris 2014.
UNESCO, WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B1, Paris 2014.
UNESCO, WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B1.Add, Paris 2014.
UNESCO, WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B2, Paris 2014.
UNESCO, WHC-14/38.COM/INF.8B2.Add, Paris 2014.
UNESCO, WHC-15/39.COM/20, Paris 2015.
UNESCO, WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1, Paris 2015.
UNESCO, WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B1.Add, Paris 2015.
UNESCO, WHC-15/39.COM/INF.8B2, Paris 2015.
UNESCO, WHC-16/40.COM/20, Paris 2016.
UNESCO, WHC-16/40.COM/INF.8B1, Paris 2016.
UNESCO, WHC-16/40.COM/INF.8B1.Add, Paris 2016.
UNESCO, WHC-16/40.COM/INF.8B2, Paris 2016.
UNESCO, WHC-16/40.COM/INF.8B2.Add, Paris 2016.
UNESCO, WHC-17/41.COM/20, Paris 2017.
UNESCO, WHC-17/41.COM/INF.8B1, Paris 2017.
UNESCO, WHC-17/41.COM/INF.8B1.Add, Paris 2017.
UNESCO, WHC-17/41.COM/INF.8B1.Add2, Paris 2017.
UNESCO, WHC-17/41.COM/INF.8B2, Paris 2017.
UNESCO, WHC-17/41.COM/INF.8B2.Add, Paris 2017.
UNESCO, WHC-18/42.COM/20, Paris 2018.
UNESCO, WHC-18/42.COM/INF.8B1, Paris 2018.
UNESCO, WHC-18/42.COM/INF.8B1.Add, Paris 2018.
UNESCO, WHC-18/42.COM/INF.8B2, Paris 2018.
UNESCO, WHC-18/42.COM/INF.8B2.Add, Paris 2018.
UNESCO, WHC-19/43.COM/20, Paris 2019.
UNESCO, WHC-19/43.COM/INF.8B1, Paris 2019.
UNESCO, WHC-19/43.COM/INF.8B1.Add, Paris 2019.
UNESCO, WHC-19/43.COM/INF.8B2, Paris 2019.
UNESCO, WHC-19/43.COM/INF.8B2.Add, Paris 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/7f0cd077-en
Article Details
Abstract views: 196
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
